From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 570E2C433ED for ; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 23:07:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DB486135F for ; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 23:07:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229718AbhDSXI0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Apr 2021 19:08:26 -0400 Received: from relay5-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.197]:34929 "EHLO relay5-d.mail.gandi.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229681AbhDSXI0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Apr 2021 19:08:26 -0400 X-Originating-IP: 50.39.163.217 Received: from localhost (unknown [50.39.163.217]) (Authenticated sender: josh@joshtriplett.org) by relay5-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E335E1C0002; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 23:07:52 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2021 16:07:49 -0700 From: Josh Triplett To: Nick Desaulniers Cc: Miguel Ojeda , rust-for-linux Subject: Re: Poll for call Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 02:20:11PM -0700, Nick Desaulniers wrote: > On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 1:43 PM Josh Triplett wrote: > > > > Either day works for me, and I'd love to join. > > > > Linux Plumbers Conference and Kernel Summit are coming up. I'd like to > > propose a "What Does the Kernel Need from Rust?" session, with my lang > > and libs hats on. > > > > I'd also love to talk about the recent LKML thread, and the plans for a > > custom alloc crate vs reusing the Rust alloc crate. > > I have a microconf proposal for "Toolchains and Kernel MC" (similar to > last year) that I'm waiting to hear back on. It would be nice if you > could hold that proposal for that MC, rather than the general > "Refereed-track." I'd actually like to propose it for Kernel Summit. I'd also be happy to participate in an LPC session similar to last year.