From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-qv1-f54.google.com (mail-qv1-f54.google.com [209.85.219.54]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C386E2206B5; Fri, 20 Dec 2024 23:48:24 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.219.54 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1734738506; cv=none; b=rq6pqcxV9KW2Tg3nBCBZRubU1nE9tLrra/pHnJ1EKiUSoorHKz+VZ96FQE7T28oejgdoVa/Fc1HNmHm4zoyj+SSIJ+M8gnfOy76XXJ2jiZ1+161//8Y5/GBBH0uh6J5R9AxkntTosJtLXhO+ZyZi88vdWzcRAfbwez3n/RUW8sY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1734738506; c=relaxed/simple; bh=iK0W2ulreLsubtQkVYatr8jdNJgT6mjwG5rWATQwCNY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=KlnJoUMlBo26PWhZ2MUgrdKsrCPpLliCRGz40k0nHPXAiwhIhyTs4X/JQK9hpZAQo4bEFHNNbgctGTsVa74LJ8WMqjv+UdrHgsqK9Wpj35njHrvARjUUsjOev/PJKOCkIQGLgYgP4/Xxy+VG1GzCyOFoSforiJm+ObWa5m/mFp4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=fnShxg0z; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.219.54 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="fnShxg0z" Received: by mail-qv1-f54.google.com with SMTP id 6a1803df08f44-6dcf62a3768so21653286d6.0; Fri, 20 Dec 2024 15:48:24 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1734738503; x=1735343303; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date :feedback-id:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=YEiaM9yukp34ZRihZk30CfDKFo5YawGYmi3+/ljP5U0=; b=fnShxg0zALpbUhOUcCejVBqRFo66Z5yMdLD+k0Y7LqLdQ212DhMDLK6FwWt7wlX+FV omFxhcgL9obR/xzbh2r/Z27TQkHyiefeO+jjrCrbYZ7nutzOseKmTfc8mPTDxxOetcN0 juvB3VUo7Te//0MmsqKGmWxhsgEsk67vyRuhMpYE5Td6LQ1MbnK77Jzf2YxkXOKlq8ve DsL1Gc5y8dCTPcX5uTVebPRaIO63pmY9wGfjpwKrdubkbFjoxocExr0w/fJ3JLJRSh/i ygjuj9qhOw5GzlAbd+LDFejvSsVgxeGP8I6Au28Uiqyv2kURc+XGlloXkKZyhYKfEO2s cw6A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1734738503; x=1735343303; h=in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date :feedback-id:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=YEiaM9yukp34ZRihZk30CfDKFo5YawGYmi3+/ljP5U0=; b=LHe50eI3+TKtb5t18kmW419Ng5307oJDtgbfb6O+XhuvZPqaDbRbQ/tlEsIGXNIEet gXvbDp+sTYVX8/5PX2ljd9E+E+idEMogJ9sEx0UYSwbC0lrrBhMAM64aH8kp0SG/tPU2 gxfpi0jZsBDh+PLHS6GPS3Iaat+T6IgOYiSulFSC6NM90fFBrmjqn0Mx1fyN3jCVPmO/ l2RdUg4NIyIpRXUbkNx71wjrRW2MHLvfpUqOAhhaIDeXRtGjD5vIPRVO3p/15aNX8r2Q 4u3yocpp++SEaU2CtwymJAchtiEAOH621PKCoVJk39CnZeawEJgE6WBszwSUdRsrDdwQ CGkQ== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCUEn0nm9TYcQAAdfeTGjSYtzFDzaLhd03gGehxVemM14LfKCPN6RekbHSWX1LGE4xWwaukkbhD3w39aDKEtM7Y=@vger.kernel.org, AJvYcCUyVTs8xEAbA9NEnOvnCk65/92IyuetA/aZ44ZF+L8MNijzj42Pt5mXhCRBmZvl8NKsSMuQ68z282PRt2U=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxjoobTzk8t2xHOXlteC+/XeElTR3ZV6dM3kpx9EbPAjzH7GHz9 MdQGhBshqmyq7MhhMvBmqfF+DUjBLuK6uNl3mWCUjpoyW4/0IPZT X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncsYFYT3Q2p8XJ/RTQKWNZN+a62L7nn9yqQCnPh/rZ6iyDNojq2rHqjLK6ugItz MzBfKASjsN718Zr4RoMe65Np0p6Fbi5iVuGa3Un1jHMrfINNgojtxoAVoJ1DjjEPv2GUMiQdk4K mpwAD/XrxSUBQYtTIIEWmYUMuIz7uvIhVW8F9ng3MG1atY3Sm2eTC0H0BnYvF7CRhKMQw/CmxwP Mjr/ZnZmpiruo7M/g5EMXGqVzrjfpkGQsZ8NgFYZmfTLpIc8gBNn9Fy4WX/7R42AN+PbDTo/zp8 DpxjNF/JYgdgXZ4lUiFgOBYIyFl/5AWYvZAv10twodZiV+0= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHrXvSr3QYs/+sf6DmS2WCOhZK4jPZopA5o4SJrQMlZfTY68+HlaJN90Urn15wVKiAXbj513Q== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:f0a:b0:6d8:a1b4:b591 with SMTP id 6a1803df08f44-6dd2334d8d7mr82432636d6.23.1734738503605; Fri, 20 Dec 2024 15:48:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from fauth-a1-smtp.messagingengine.com (fauth-a1-smtp.messagingengine.com. [103.168.172.200]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 6a1803df08f44-6dd181bfe54sm21561776d6.88.2024.12.20.15.48.22 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 20 Dec 2024 15:48:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from phl-compute-05.internal (phl-compute-05.phl.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailfauth.phl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9543F1200043; Fri, 20 Dec 2024 18:48:22 -0500 (EST) Received: from phl-mailfrontend-02 ([10.202.2.163]) by phl-compute-05.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 20 Dec 2024 18:48:22 -0500 X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeefuddruddtfedgudegucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdggtfgfnhhsuhgsshgtrhhisggvpdfu rfetoffkrfgpnffqhgenuceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnh htshculddquddttddmnecujfgurhepfffhvfevuffkfhggtggugfgjsehtkeertddttdej necuhfhrohhmpeeuohhquhhnucfhvghnghcuoegsohhquhhnrdhfvghnghesghhmrghilh drtghomheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepvefghfeuveekudetgfevudeuudejfeeltdfh gfehgeekkeeigfdukefhgfegleefnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrg hmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepsghoqhhunhdomhgvshhmthhprghuthhhphgvrhhsohhnrghl ihhthidqieelvdeghedtieegqddujeejkeehheehvddqsghoqhhunhdrfhgvnhhgpeepgh hmrghilhdrtghomhesfhhigihmvgdrnhgrmhgvpdhnsggprhgtphhtthhopedukedpmhho uggvpehsmhhtphhouhhtpdhrtghpthhtohepmhhighhuvghlrdhojhgvuggrrdhsrghnug honhhishesghhmrghilhdrtghomhdprhgtphhtthhopehlhihuuggvsehrvgguhhgrthdr tghomhdprhgtphhtthhopehmihhnghhosehrvgguhhgrthdrtghomhdprhgtphhtthhope hpvghtvghriiesihhnfhhrrgguvggrugdrohhrghdprhgtphhtthhopehojhgvuggrsehk vghrnhgvlhdrohhrghdprhgtphhtthhopeifihhllheskhgvrhhnvghlrdhorhhgpdhrtg hpthhtoheplhhonhhgmhgrnhesrhgvughhrghtrdgtohhmpdhrtghpthhtoheprghlvgig rdhgrgihnhhorhesghhmrghilhdrtghomhdprhgtphhtthhopehgrghrhiesghgrrhihgh huohdrnhgvth X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: iad51458e:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Fri, 20 Dec 2024 18:48:21 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2024 15:48:20 -0800 From: Boqun Feng To: Miguel Ojeda Cc: Lyude Paul , Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , Miguel Ojeda , Will Deacon , Waiman Long , Alex Gaynor , Gary Guo , =?iso-8859-1?Q?Bj=F6rn?= Roy Baron , Benno Lossin , Andreas Hindborg , Alice Ryhl , Trevor Gross , rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Filipe Xavier Subject: Re: [RFC 1/5] locking: MAINTAINERS: Start watching Rust locking primitives Message-ID: References: <20241128054022.19586-1-boqun.feng@gmail.com> <20241128054022.19586-2-boqun.feng@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: On Thu, Dec 05, 2024 at 12:39:44PM +0100, Miguel Ojeda wrote: > On Wed, Dec 4, 2024 at 10:04 PM Boqun Feng wrote: > > > > Thanks! Yes, it'll be great to have more people watching this. And thank > > you for the review and contribution so far, nice job! > > Indeed -- thanks Lyude! > > > I'm currently waiting for both lock maintainers and Rust maintainers > > opinions on the particular changes on the MAINTAINERS file (for example, > > maybe they want something similar to "RUST [ALLOC]" entry, i.e. a > > standalone entry). My plan is to send the PR after everyone is on the > > same page. And you're welcome to send a patch adding yourself in the > > entry afterwards. > > Up to you! :) > > I guess it depends on whether the rest of the locking maintainers want > to see every patch related to that (which would be great) or not, > whether you want to have finer-grained control on who gets pinged, > potentially different "M:" level and so on. For instance, it would > allow you to have an explicit "L:" for the Rust for Linux list. > > By the way, as a third alternative, you could also consider a > sub-entry in locking, too, i.e. "LOCKING PRIMITIVES [RUST]" as a > middle ground, which would allow you to keep routing patches through > locking but have the benefits of a sub-entry if you need them. > I will keep it as it is because I do want more reviews on Rust locking parts from the current locking maintainers ;-). We can always change this in the future. > Whatever you decide: > > Acked-by: Miguel Ojeda > Thanks! Regards, Boqun > Thanks! > > Cheers, > Miguel