From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1C8F9202C3A; Wed, 12 Feb 2025 20:58:29 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1739393910; cv=none; b=cuY/nv9rmWfeqjUJOKJl8X79DD4OoURgvRX1DaXFRWTxXI78zDjy7A0niZuqeuuI0RgjWHzGUuh48lI6Zo/rCoEQP5kMijLSbRryLhKn2djf6zmNJWoYPqzxjsP4OYDKvJ2cfVwvsFYf3jZXsxpWIMVmUe+Cdb3ce55kKy/xfUE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1739393910; c=relaxed/simple; bh=lGuZTURnocyqzlCsBc0qRo7e7wpIAl09SxCgBnfjR5s=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=CobHZVhE9XbPGnybcMdAF2+FApUc/1snh/RVJR5zYCh+o5qNcjBx/qK67AVSXr4AzWnR6p6/lBaIgBOhL1XRgIElNveFJIAt2s9LlMHRsuVHjhDIOYPl7HyZjHsKmLJofs2owOP/9fJzeF48g6h0y4F5Bb5sK2XlgYkyRKljt64= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=LNsMoTo0; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="LNsMoTo0" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5187FC4CEDF; Wed, 12 Feb 2025 20:58:26 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1739393909; bh=lGuZTURnocyqzlCsBc0qRo7e7wpIAl09SxCgBnfjR5s=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=LNsMoTo0pV3yRcqaQjmOywu8dBYL3qwHsJGOunv8GZIykN15CPIlMFiQAEc0RbgL1 8INPEtX44kSJtuP7V0edzDgoQF6frKRDRutXW5FJwN4E4PpXSyfff4naMHgcF0fxIr JZGEf7HI1zgGgq7WUT7NdyKUP37VezUpppBNs04hF/ouh9W57qRg9Qdrqths7bMI1U v7oDq/1DX1BDbCESO7kZyRlt1gF/OsZX2Obsxf/a1S/F5G9/vGxX+K9R7Ykf8AaVOo nnnU0qRGzoUtywDitFGHtTGKjd0QZXZlHaUmLxz6X2eq4jQi3IpBUV/nSqczblLQ5N CzYKXsJpTvgIQ== Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2025 21:58:23 +0100 From: Danilo Krummrich To: Tamir Duberstein Cc: Gary Guo , Miguel Ojeda , DJ Delorie , Eric Blake , Paul Eggert , Alex Gaynor , Boqun Feng , =?iso-8859-1?Q?Bj=F6rn?= Roy Baron , Benno Lossin , Andreas Hindborg , Alice Ryhl , Trevor Gross , rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org, linux-man@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] rust: alloc: satisfy POSIX alignment requirement Message-ID: References: <20250212-aligned-alloc-v5-1-c51e0b17dee9@gmail.com> <20250212163848.22e8dcff@eugeo> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 03:47:11PM -0500, Tamir Duberstein wrote: > Looks like I wasn't the only one to fall into the trap (rust/kernel/io.rs): > > #[inline] > const fn io_addr_assert(&self, offset: usize) -> usize { > build_assert!(Self::offset_valid::(offset, SIZE)); > > self.addr() + offset > } > > since offset isn't known at compile time, this can easily be misused? Well, that's intentional. iomem.readb(0x0) // succeeds if SIZE >=1 iomem.readb(foo) // fails if foo is not known at compile time iomem.try_readb(foo) // succeeds if self.maxsize() >= 1