From: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: "Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>,
"Will Deacon" <will@kernel.org>,
"Waiman Long" <longman@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Miguel Ojeda" <ojeda@kernel.org>,
"Alex Gaynor" <alex.gaynor@gmail.com>,
"Gary Guo" <gary@garyguo.net>,
"Björn Roy Baron" <bjorn3_gh@protonmail.com>,
"Benno Lossin" <benno.lossin@proton.me>,
"Andreas Hindborg" <a.hindborg@kernel.org>,
"Alice Ryhl" <aliceryhl@google.com>,
"Trevor Gross" <tmgross@umich.edu>,
"open list:RUST:Keyword:b(?i:rust)b"
<rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH locking 00/11] LOCKDEP and Rust locking changes for v6.15
Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2025 16:11:30 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z8uLMtcrWNMPqFrc@boqun-archlinux> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Z8uLOFLbq-EqAUfJ@gmail.com>
On Sat, Mar 08, 2025 at 01:11:36AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
[...]
> > > I've applied these 3 patches to the tip:locking/urgent tree:
> > >
> > > locking/semaphore: Use wake_q to wake up processes outside lock critical section
> > > locking/rtmutex: Use the 'struct' keyword in kernel-doc comment
> > > rust: lockdep: Remove support for dynamically allocated LockClassKeys
> > >
> > > As a general rule, if a patch is marked Cc: stable, it must also be
> > > applied to current upstream.
> > >
> >
> > Do you prefer a separate pull request for the future? I can send one for
> > urgent and one for locking/core.
>
> One tree is fine - maybe indicate which ones are urgent material and
> keep them at the head of the tree?
>
Sounds good to me, will do.
Regards,
Boqun
> Thanks,
>
> Ingo
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-08 0:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-26 4:12 [GIT PULL] LOCKDEP and Rust locking changes for v6.15 Boqun Feng
2025-02-28 18:57 ` Boqun Feng
2025-03-03 16:52 ` Waiman Long
2025-03-03 18:42 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-03-07 23:26 ` [PATCH locking 00/11] " Boqun Feng
2025-03-07 23:26 ` [PATCH locking 07/11] rust: sync: Add accessor for the lock behind a given guard Boqun Feng
2025-03-07 23:26 ` [PATCH locking 08/11] rust: sync: lock: Add an example for Guard::lock_ref() Boqun Feng
2025-03-07 23:26 ` [PATCH locking 09/11] rust: sync: condvar: Add wait_interruptible_freezable() Boqun Feng
2025-03-07 23:27 ` [PATCH locking 10/11] rust: lockdep: Remove support for dynamically allocated LockClassKeys Boqun Feng
2025-03-07 23:27 ` [PATCH locking 11/11] rust: lockdep: Use Pin for all LockClassKey usages Boqun Feng
2025-03-08 0:01 ` [PATCH locking 00/11] LOCKDEP and Rust locking changes for v6.15 Ingo Molnar
2025-03-08 0:04 ` Boqun Feng
2025-03-08 0:11 ` Ingo Molnar
2025-03-08 0:11 ` Boqun Feng [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z8uLMtcrWNMPqFrc@boqun-archlinux \
--to=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=a.hindborg@kernel.org \
--cc=alex.gaynor@gmail.com \
--cc=aliceryhl@google.com \
--cc=benno.lossin@proton.me \
--cc=bjorn3_gh@protonmail.com \
--cc=gary@garyguo.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=ojeda@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tmgross@umich.edu \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).