Re: [PATCH v1 0/7] Bindings for the workqueue

[Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>]

Hello, Alice.

On Wed, May 17, 2023 at 08:31:12PM +0000, Alice Ryhl wrote:
> This patchset contains bindings for the kernel workqueue.
> 
> One of the primary goals behind the design used in this patch is that we
> must support embedding the `work_struct` as a field in user-provided
> types, because this allows you to submit things to the workqueue without
> having to allocate, making the submission infallible. If we didn't have
> to support this, then the patch would be much simpler. One of the main
> things that make it complicated is that we must ensure that the function
> pointer in the `work_struct` is compatible with the struct it is
> contained within.
> 
> This patch could be significantly simplified if we already had the field
> projection bindings. However, we have decided to upstream the current
> version that does not depend on field projection first - the PR that
> introduces field projections will then include a commit that simplifies
> the workqueue implementation. (In particular, it would simplify the 5th
> patch in this series.)
> 
> The first version of the workqueue bindings was written by Wedson, but
> I have rewritten much of it so that it uses the pin-init infrastructure
> and can be used with containers other than `Arc`.

I tried to read the patches but am too dumb to understand much. Any chance
you can provide some examples so that I can at least imagine how workqueue
would be used from rust side?

Thanks.

-- 
tejun