From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5364717C1 for ; Sun, 22 Oct 2023 10:49:01 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=none Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 019E6C433C7; Sun, 22 Oct 2023 10:48:58 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2023 11:48:56 +0100 From: Catalin Marinas To: Miguel Ojeda Cc: Jamie Cunliffe , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org, Miguel Ojeda , Will Deacon , steve.capper@arm.com, Asahi Lina , boqun.feng@gmail.com, andrew@lunn.ch Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] arm64: rust: Enable Rust support for AArch64 Message-ID: References: <20231020155056.3495121-1-Jamie.Cunliffe@arm.com> <20231020155056.3495121-3-Jamie.Cunliffe@arm.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: On Sat, Oct 21, 2023 at 03:40:21PM +0200, Miguel Ojeda wrote: > On Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at 6:46 PM Catalin Marinas wrote: > > Miguel, Will acked this already so I think it's good to go. Do you plan > > to pick both patches via the Rust tree? > > Thanks for taking a look! > > As you prefer -- ideally the changes for each architecture would go > through their own trees (we are trying to get maintainers of the > different parts of the kernel involved with Rust for their own bits > and pieces), but if you think there is a reason to avoid that, I can > also take them as fallback for the time being. The main reason I asked was that the first patch touches x86 and none of the x86 maintainers have been cc'ed or acked the patch. I thought there's some deal that Rust-related changes go via you tree. > > Acked-by: Catalin Marinas > > If you decide to take them: > > Acked-by: Miguel Ojeda > > I have boot tested it in aarch64 QEMU and saw the KUnit Rust tests > passing and checked that the x86 side still works fine. Thanks. I'll reply to the first patch and cc some x86 maintainers. I assume your ack applies to the first patch as well. -- Catalin