From: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: cl@linux.com, penberg@kernel.org, rientjes@google.com,
iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
roman.gushchin@linux.dev, 42.hyeyoo@gmail.com, urezki@gmail.com,
hch@infradead.org, kees@kernel.org, ojeda@kernel.org,
wedsonaf@gmail.com, mhocko@kernel.org, mpe@ellerman.id.au,
chandan.babu@oracle.com, christian.koenig@amd.com,
maz@kernel.org, oliver.upton@linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] mm: vmalloc: implement vrealloc()
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2024 03:35:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZqhDXkFNaN_Cx11e@cassiopeiae> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZqfomPVr7PadY8Et@cassiopeiae>
On Mon, Jul 29, 2024 at 09:08:16PM +0200, Danilo Krummrich wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 26, 2024 at 10:05:47PM +0200, Danilo Krummrich wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 26, 2024 at 04:37:43PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> > > On 7/22/24 6:29 PM, Danilo Krummrich wrote:
> > > > Implement vrealloc() analogous to krealloc().
> > > >
> > > > Currently, krealloc() requires the caller to pass the size of the
> > > > previous memory allocation, which, instead, should be self-contained.
> > > >
> > > > We attempt to fix this in a subsequent patch which, in order to do so,
> > > > requires vrealloc().
> > > >
> > > > Besides that, we need realloc() functions for kernel allocators in Rust
> > > > too. With `Vec` or `KVec` respectively, potentially growing (and
> > > > shrinking) data structures are rather common.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org>
> > >
> > > Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
> > >
> > > > --- a/mm/vmalloc.c
> > > > +++ b/mm/vmalloc.c
> > > > @@ -4037,6 +4037,65 @@ void *vzalloc_node_noprof(unsigned long size, int node)
> > > > }
> > > > EXPORT_SYMBOL(vzalloc_node_noprof);
> > > >
> > > > +/**
> > > > + * vrealloc - reallocate virtually contiguous memory; contents remain unchanged
> > > > + * @p: object to reallocate memory for
> > > > + * @size: the size to reallocate
> > > > + * @flags: the flags for the page level allocator
> > > > + *
> > > > + * The contents of the object pointed to are preserved up to the lesser of the
> > > > + * new and old size (__GFP_ZERO flag is effectively ignored).
> > >
> > > Well, technically not correct as we don't shrink. Get 8 pages, kvrealloc to
> > > 4 pages, kvrealloc back to 8 and the last 4 are not zeroed. But it's not
> > > new, kvrealloc() did the same before patch 2/2.
> >
> > Taking it (too) literal, it's not wrong. The contents of the object pointed to
> > are indeed preserved up to the lesser of the new and old size. It's just that
> > the rest may be "preserved" as well.
> >
> > I work on implementing shrink and grow for vrealloc(). In the meantime I think
> > we could probably just memset() spare memory to zero.
>
> Probably, this was a bad idea. Even with shrinking implemented we'd need to
> memset() potential spare memory of the last page to zero, when new_size <
> old_size.
>
> Analogously, the same would be true for krealloc() buckets. That's probably not
> worth it.
>
> I think we should indeed just document that __GFP_ZERO doesn't work for
> re-allocating memory and start to warn about it. As already mentioned, I think
> we should at least gurantee that *realloc(NULL, size, flags | __GFP_ZERO) is
> valid, i.e. WARN_ON(p && flags & __GFP_ZERO).
Maybe I spoke a bit to soon with this last paragraph. I think continuously
gowing something with __GFP_ZERO is a legitimate use case. I just did a quick
grep for users of krealloc() with __GFP_ZERO and found 18 matches.
So, I think, at least for now, we should instead document that __GFP_ZERO is
only fully honored when the buffer is grown continuously (without intermediate
shrinking) and __GFP_ZERO is supplied in every iteration.
In case I miss something here, and not even this case is safe, it looks like
we have 18 broken users of krealloc().
>
> >
> > nommu would still uses krealloc() though...
> >
> > >
> > > But it's also fundamentally not true for krealloc(), or kvrealloc()
> > > switching from a kmalloc to valloc. ksize() returns the size of the kmalloc
> > > bucket, we don't know what was the exact prior allocation size.
> >
> > Probably a stupid question, but can't we just zero the full bucket initially and
> > make sure to memset() spare memory in the bucket to zero when krealloc() is
> > called with new_size < ksize()?
> >
> > > Worse, we
> > > started poisoning the padding in debug configurations, so even a
> > > kmalloc(__GFP_ZERO) followed by krealloc(__GFP_ZERO) can give you unexpected
> > > poison now...
> >
> > As in writing magics directly to the spare memory in the bucket? Which would
> > then also be copied over to a new buffer in __do_krealloc()?
> >
> > >
> > > I guess we should just document __GFP_ZERO is not honored at all for
> > > realloc, and maybe start even warning :/ Hopefully nobody relies on that.
> >
> > I think it'd be great to make __GFP_ZERO work in all cases. However, if that's
> > really not possible, I'd prefer if we could at least gurantee that
> > *realloc(NULL, size, flags | __GFP_ZERO) is a valid call, i.e.
> > WARN_ON(p && flags & __GFP_ZERO).
> >
> > >
> > > > + *
> > > > + * If @p is %NULL, vrealloc() behaves exactly like vmalloc(). If @size is 0 and
> > > > + * @p is not a %NULL pointer, the object pointed to is freed.
> > > > + *
> > > > + * Return: pointer to the allocated memory; %NULL if @size is zero or in case of
> > > > + * failure
> > > > + */
> > > > +void *vrealloc_noprof(const void *p, size_t size, gfp_t flags)
> > > > +{
> > > > + size_t old_size = 0;
> > > > + void *n;
> > > > +
> > > > + if (!size) {
> > > > + vfree(p);
> > > > + return NULL;
> > > > + }
> > > > +
> > > > + if (p) {
> > > > + struct vm_struct *vm;
> > > > +
> > > > + vm = find_vm_area(p);
> > > > + if (unlikely(!vm)) {
> > > > + WARN(1, "Trying to vrealloc() nonexistent vm area (%p)\n", p);
> > > > + return NULL;
> > > > + }
> > > > +
> > > > + old_size = get_vm_area_size(vm);
> > > > + }
> > > > +
> > > > + if (size <= old_size) {
> > > > + /*
> > > > + * TODO: Shrink the vm_area, i.e. unmap and free unused pages.
> > > > + * What would be a good heuristic for when to shrink the
> > > > + * vm_area?
> > > > + */
> > > > + return (void *)p;
> > > > + }
> > > > +
> > > > + /* TODO: Grow the vm_area, i.e. allocate and map additional pages. */
> > > > + n = __vmalloc_noprof(size, flags);
> > > > + if (!n)
> > > > + return NULL;
> > > > +
> > > > + if (p) {
> > > > + memcpy(n, p, old_size);
> > > > + vfree(p);
> > > > + }
> > > > +
> > > > + return n;
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > #if defined(CONFIG_64BIT) && defined(CONFIG_ZONE_DMA32)
> > > > #define GFP_VMALLOC32 (GFP_DMA32 | GFP_KERNEL)
> > > > #elif defined(CONFIG_64BIT) && defined(CONFIG_ZONE_DMA)
> > >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-30 1:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-22 16:29 [PATCH v2 0/2] Align kvrealloc() with krealloc() Danilo Krummrich
2024-07-22 16:29 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] mm: vmalloc: implement vrealloc() Danilo Krummrich
2024-07-26 14:37 ` Vlastimil Babka
2024-07-26 20:05 ` Danilo Krummrich
2024-07-29 19:08 ` Danilo Krummrich
2024-07-30 1:35 ` Danilo Krummrich [this message]
2024-07-30 12:15 ` Vlastimil Babka
2024-07-30 13:14 ` Danilo Krummrich
2024-07-30 13:58 ` Vlastimil Babka
2024-07-30 14:32 ` Danilo Krummrich
2024-09-02 1:36 ` Feng Tang
2024-09-02 7:04 ` Feng Tang
2024-09-02 8:56 ` Vlastimil Babka
2024-09-03 3:18 ` Feng Tang
2024-09-06 7:35 ` Feng Tang
2024-07-22 16:29 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] mm: kvmalloc: align kvrealloc() with krealloc() Danilo Krummrich
2024-07-23 1:43 ` Andrew Morton
2024-07-23 14:05 ` Danilo Krummrich
2024-07-23 7:50 ` Michal Hocko
2024-07-23 10:42 ` Danilo Krummrich
2024-07-23 10:55 ` Michal Hocko
2024-07-23 11:55 ` Danilo Krummrich
2024-07-23 12:12 ` Michal Hocko
2024-07-23 13:33 ` Danilo Krummrich
2024-07-23 18:53 ` Michal Hocko
2024-07-26 14:38 ` Vlastimil Babka
2024-07-23 18:54 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] Align " Michal Hocko
2024-07-23 18:56 ` Danilo Krummrich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZqhDXkFNaN_Cx11e@cassiopeiae \
--to=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=42.hyeyoo@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=chandan.babu@oracle.com \
--cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=ojeda@kernel.org \
--cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=urezki@gmail.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=wedsonaf@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).