From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5BC4A16BE14; Wed, 14 Aug 2024 17:15:08 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1723655708; cv=none; b=k1nYUce+bApEQR6HzydkYHCnzu/zGDjILZZ+xO57MTtODA0yRrhN+wPxrBIQyU7U0fViI5Ohm/DnZisD95+wd/RRztkFwmvkI7hqf5X8bZ+ECcFbNwzCVzQxlyrwyVh++uX/5NyHpViBHiwHv0vrELJZSZ2YBg8Z/Ay0bEwePis= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1723655708; c=relaxed/simple; bh=LZNl/0dMNUwtsIJ7Bs4q3NpAqp++UT74bj432Awj02Y=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=HSf1GOia9Ns6zGrZBn+mJRzkGyd82HvYeFXQnL0ZI4gYSJrFqMOTJAZuMIAleGKf3R+n0ZIt83MGYZnv2dT8D0uPBxeTXRzl4nFN0iQtpSJIn3X8gQULu/7OeD6ZiG0La+6OpLxxR+QMKF0fWl4qQ9li7QuOjH5kezi0BsvXk2w= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=TsMhsC1b; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="TsMhsC1b" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 29ECAC116B1; Wed, 14 Aug 2024 17:15:02 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1723655707; bh=LZNl/0dMNUwtsIJ7Bs4q3NpAqp++UT74bj432Awj02Y=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=TsMhsC1bTlMV+1CFcJDzm9Q9JN8DPtirmVnULKyLMmGs+c922ngMXJJlmR7aWRzv/ pSVoZ3DF9GPZKGLCjHKkJ5FSfzfmqgpxNU6C8mvGXpmBLBSN+Bukg/YfB4ukHmw5CW O4c7dhpOT5SrvHwq9dFrM+vl3j3RpE48cxYkU1VaqBswn3me2mmHwKvViFaDVNeURo qy/tQouX9m82sbdFKufG9BjiBK6GJbypq4TjrSiIs3lqQmcalnl2acDIUD2gQQRABI YbQgDsXmcfdAztqXjU1z2GgkXTNubeoz+ez0yPmnLWg+6AOjx9A5A9TJbCyWnhRFRm NI71ngU277img== Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2024 19:15:00 +0200 From: Danilo Krummrich To: Benno Lossin Cc: ojeda@kernel.org, alex.gaynor@gmail.com, wedsonaf@gmail.com, boqun.feng@gmail.com, gary@garyguo.net, bjorn3_gh@protonmail.com, a.hindborg@samsung.com, aliceryhl@google.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, daniel.almeida@collabora.com, faith.ekstrand@collabora.com, boris.brezillon@collabora.com, lina@asahilina.net, mcanal@igalia.com, zhiw@nvidia.com, cjia@nvidia.com, jhubbard@nvidia.com, airlied@redhat.com, ajanulgu@redhat.com, lyude@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 04/26] rust: alloc: implement `Allocator` for `Kmalloc` Message-ID: References: <20240812182355.11641-1-dakr@kernel.org> <20240812182355.11641-5-dakr@kernel.org> <17bcfe21-1af3-4247-98d1-480944be400e@proton.me> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <17bcfe21-1af3-4247-98d1-480944be400e@proton.me> On Wed, Aug 14, 2024 at 05:02:53PM +0000, Benno Lossin wrote: > On 14.08.24 18:59, Danilo Krummrich wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 14, 2024 at 04:21:38PM +0000, Benno Lossin wrote: > >> On 12.08.24 20:22, Danilo Krummrich wrote: > >>> + unsafe fn call( > >>> + &self, > >>> + ptr: Option>, > >>> + layout: Layout, > >>> + flags: Flags, > >>> + ) -> Result, AllocError> { > >>> + let size = aligned_size(layout); > >>> + let ptr = match ptr { > >>> + Some(ptr) => ptr.as_ptr(), > >>> + None => ptr::null(), > >>> + }; > >>> + > >>> + // SAFETY: `ptr` is either NULL or valid by the safety requirements of this function. > >>> + let raw_ptr = unsafe { > >>> + // If `size == 0` and `ptr != NULL` the memory behind the pointer is freed. > >>> + self.0(ptr.cast(), size, flags.0).cast() > >>> + }; > >>> + > >>> + let ptr = if size == 0 { > >> > >> Why do you do this check *after* calling `self.0`? > > > > Because I need `raw_ptr` in the else case below. > > But you can just return early above? I would prefer the check be done > before `self.0` is called. No, we can't return early, we need `self.0` to be called, because if `size == 0` we free the given allocation, if any. > > --- > Cheers, > Benno >