From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 901C01AD270; Tue, 3 Sep 2024 12:03:18 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1725364998; cv=none; b=icgKc2FwRHFfjSxelUYPoTi/vfAb+1t+2slqJID067Yf2bii3H6W7rgXkxCiDAGoASmrMRON+MVt0kmlxAgFf/zDvcQL95DWc38ZSYJMsBhcnlMcf05Z+POnSsFRNAA0DjgFNHGgIDg8mzCH2jFPNYXKAkiClR7+lkhS67uQPms= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1725364998; c=relaxed/simple; bh=YPy+r4zg7f1az0PYCHCW/JeLrJV/ZbE3/iouVRE6qRY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=V6wupsvQvZO5wh6xyYo6xQrab9g7VmRn9nqkRU+fu6s8x41H06Abo6q182uAp2QMxpHpTAX/PA4R7lB/cArrC62sTNbqRom0f9zDbY59cA4B4r6J37Qshm36ZnsfdIYyl4joBoZAYpcNjWd3B0noqS7VANS5Z8QVDRQlEf9nmv4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=C73WGUft; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="C73WGUft" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6AEAEC4CEC4; Tue, 3 Sep 2024 12:03:13 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1725364998; bh=YPy+r4zg7f1az0PYCHCW/JeLrJV/ZbE3/iouVRE6qRY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=C73WGUftiJpFzJsxwyW/z1QaAF6j4KZ4bmGrxlkYK09w3jde19Z+QSMUSjEX25IQI QAfFvcWJbIhrU9K3cY0oHWhslkDOsGYx9O6Xur9hYfzkeEyfV+/IDdlNpsVdM74mDz ds6H5kkGSSb0KwenCskfcm8lMoOnes/Bbvi1z3a9NwpBudWb2BtCg0JfMCOtjUT7t5 +cgzAZKIfezcQ5203MXGGSGGmSJL1745AuY0S7l0HrCfFZsKsUL7VlORib4m/YjFMH yZvK7R0l3kEOyCgNVOAAZkC18T2CNaMkQyiA8Rp9ZKEnkvtVgW3QxkF7mrri4+wiG3 IvntVr4i37KXw== Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2024 14:03:09 +0200 From: Danilo Krummrich To: Gary Guo Cc: ojeda@kernel.org, alex.gaynor@gmail.com, wedsonaf@gmail.com, boqun.feng@gmail.com, bjorn3_gh@protonmail.com, benno.lossin@proton.me, a.hindborg@samsung.com, aliceryhl@google.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, daniel.almeida@collabora.com, faith.ekstrand@collabora.com, boris.brezillon@collabora.com, lina@asahilina.net, mcanal@igalia.com, zhiw@nvidia.com, cjia@nvidia.com, jhubbard@nvidia.com, airlied@redhat.com, ajanulgu@redhat.com, lyude@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 26/26] MAINTAINERS: add entry for the Rust `alloc` module Message-ID: References: <20240816001216.26575-1-dakr@kernel.org> <20240816001216.26575-27-dakr@kernel.org> <20240831135712.0d7366b6.gary@garyguo.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240831135712.0d7366b6.gary@garyguo.net> On Sat, Aug 31, 2024 at 01:57:12PM +0100, Gary Guo wrote: > On Fri, 16 Aug 2024 02:11:08 +0200 > Danilo Krummrich wrote: > > > Add maintainers entry for the Rust `alloc` module. > > > > Currently, this includes the `Allocator` API itself, `Allocator` > > implementations, such as `Kmalloc` or `Vmalloc`, as well as the kernel's > > implementation of the primary memory allocation data structures, `Box` > > and `Vec`. > > > > Signed-off-by: Danilo Krummrich > > --- > > MAINTAINERS | 7 +++++++ > > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS > > index 42decde38320..560516b3aaf4 100644 > > --- a/MAINTAINERS > > +++ b/MAINTAINERS > > @@ -19925,6 +19925,13 @@ F: scripts/*rust* > > F: tools/testing/selftests/rust/ > > K: \b(?i:rust)\b > > > > +RUST [ALLOC] > > +M: Danilo Krummrich > > +L: rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org > > +S: Maintained > > +F: rust/kernel/alloc.rs > > +F: rust/kernel/alloc/ > > It feels like we should use `mod.rs`. The same would be true for: - rust/kernel/sync.rs - rust/kernel/net.rs - rust/kernel/init.rs - rust/kernel/fs.rs - ... Do you propose to change it for all of them? > > > + > > RXRPC SOCKETS (AF_RXRPC) > > M: David Howells > > M: Marc Dionne >