From: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: "Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>,
"Dirk Behme" <dirk.behme@gmail.com>,
"Lyude Paul" <lyude@redhat.com>,
rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org,
"Danilo Krummrich" <dakr@redhat.com>,
airlied@redhat.com, "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>,
will@kernel.org, "Waiman Long" <longman@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Miguel Ojeda" <ojeda@kernel.org>,
"Alex Gaynor" <alex.gaynor@gmail.com>,
wedsonaf@gmail.com, "Gary Guo" <gary@garyguo.net>,
"Björn Roy Baron" <bjorn3_gh@protonmail.com>,
"Benno Lossin" <benno.lossin@proton.me>,
"Andreas Hindborg" <a.hindborg@samsung.com>,
aliceryhl@google.com, "Trevor Gross" <tmgross@umich.edu>
Subject: Re: [POC 1/6] irq & spin_lock: Add counted interrupt disabling/enabling
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2024 14:57:02 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZxrCrlg1XvaTtJ1I@boqun-archlinux> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87bjz95sc4.ffs@tglx>
On Thu, Oct 24, 2024 at 07:22:19PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 24 2024 at 12:05, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 23, 2024 at 10:38:38PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> >> But if we want to support insanity then we make preempt count 64 bit and
> >> be done with it. But no, I don't think that encouraging insanity is a
> >> good thing.
> >
> > The problem is that in most release builds the overflow will be silent
> > and cause spurious weirdness that is a pain in the arse to debug :/
> >
> > That is my only concern -- making insane code crash hard is good, making
> > it silently mostly work but cause random weirdness is not.
>
> I wish we could come up with a lightweight check for that.
>
Since the preempt part takes exactly one byte in the preempt counter,
maybe we could use a "incb + jo"?
For example as below, note that since I used OF here, so it will try the
byte as s8 therefore overflow at 128, so 127 is the max level of
nesting.
Would this be a relatively lightweight check?
Regards,
Boqun
--------------------------->8
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/current.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/current.h
index bf5953883ec3..c233b7703194 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/current.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/current.h
@@ -16,7 +16,10 @@ struct pcpu_hot {
union {
struct {
struct task_struct *current_task;
- int preempt_count;
+ union {
+ int preempt_count;
+ u8 preempt_bytes[4];
+ };
int cpu_number;
#ifdef CONFIG_MITIGATION_CALL_DEPTH_TRACKING
u64 call_depth;
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/percpu.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/percpu.h
index c55a79d5feae..8d3725f8f2c7 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/percpu.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/percpu.h
@@ -251,6 +251,17 @@ do { \
percpu_binary_op(size, qual, "add", var, val); \
} while (0)
+#define percpu_check_inc(size, qual, _var) \
+({ \
+ bool overflow; \
+ \
+ asm qual (__pcpu_op1_##size("inc", __percpu_arg([var])) \
+ CC_SET(o) \
+ : CC_OUT(o) (overflow), [var] "+m" (__my_cpu_var(_var))); \
+ \
+ overflow; \
+})
+
/*
* Add return operation
*/
@@ -488,6 +499,7 @@ do { \
#define this_cpu_read_stable_4(pcp) __raw_cpu_read_stable(4, pcp)
#define raw_cpu_add_1(pcp, val) percpu_add_op(1, , (pcp), val)
+#define raw_cpu_check_inc_1(pcp) percpu_check_inc(1, , (pcp))
#define raw_cpu_add_2(pcp, val) percpu_add_op(2, , (pcp), val)
#define raw_cpu_add_4(pcp, val) percpu_add_op(4, , (pcp), val)
#define raw_cpu_and_1(pcp, val) percpu_binary_op(1, , "and", (pcp), val)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/preempt.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/preempt.h
index 919909d8cb77..a39cf8c0fc8b 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/preempt.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/preempt.h
@@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
#ifndef __ASM_PREEMPT_H
#define __ASM_PREEMPT_H
+#include <asm/bug.h>
#include <asm/rmwcc.h>
#include <asm/percpu.h>
#include <asm/current.h>
@@ -76,7 +77,12 @@ static __always_inline bool test_preempt_need_resched(void)
static __always_inline void __preempt_count_add(int val)
{
- raw_cpu_add_4(pcpu_hot.preempt_count, val);
+ if (__builtin_constant_p(val) && val == 1) {
+ /* Panic if overflow */
+ BUG_ON(raw_cpu_check_inc_1(pcpu_hot.preempt_bytes[0]));
+ } else {
+ raw_cpu_add_4(pcpu_hot.preempt_count, val);
+ }
}
static __always_inline void __preempt_count_sub(int val)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-24 21:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 75+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-16 21:28 [PATCH v6 0/3] rust: Add irq abstraction, SpinLockIrq Lyude Paul
2024-09-16 21:28 ` [PATCH v6 1/3] rust: Introduce irq module Lyude Paul
2024-09-29 20:36 ` Trevor Gross
2024-09-29 23:45 ` Boqun Feng
2024-10-02 20:20 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-10-04 8:58 ` Benno Lossin
2024-10-04 17:18 ` Lyude Paul
2024-10-17 18:51 ` Lyude Paul
2024-10-04 17:02 ` Lyude Paul
2024-10-10 21:00 ` Daniel Almeida
2024-09-16 21:28 ` [PATCH v6 2/3] rust: sync: Introduce lock::Backend::Context Lyude Paul
2024-09-29 20:40 ` Trevor Gross
2024-09-29 23:52 ` Boqun Feng
2024-09-16 21:28 ` [PATCH v6 3/3] rust: sync: Add SpinLockIrq Lyude Paul
2024-09-29 20:50 ` Trevor Gross
2024-09-29 23:59 ` Boqun Feng
2024-10-02 20:53 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-10-03 12:51 ` Boqun Feng
2024-10-04 18:48 ` Lyude Paul
2024-10-05 18:19 ` Lyude Paul
2024-10-07 12:42 ` Boqun Feng
2024-10-07 18:13 ` Lyude Paul
2024-10-15 12:57 ` Andreas Hindborg
2024-10-15 20:17 ` Boqun Feng
2024-10-15 20:21 ` Boqun Feng
2024-10-16 20:57 ` Lyude Paul
2024-10-17 13:34 ` Andreas Hindborg
2024-10-07 12:01 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-10-07 18:30 ` Lyude Paul
2024-10-08 15:21 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-10-12 8:01 ` Boqun Feng
2024-10-10 16:39 ` [PATCH v6 0/3] rust: Add irq abstraction, SpinLockIrq Daniel Almeida
2024-10-12 5:29 ` Dirk Behme
2024-10-13 19:06 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-10-13 21:43 ` Boqun Feng
2024-10-16 21:00 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-10-16 21:31 ` Boqun Feng
2024-10-17 20:49 ` Lyude Paul
2024-10-17 22:27 ` Boqun Feng
2024-10-18 5:51 ` [POC 0/6] Allow SpinLockIrq to use a normal Guard interface Boqun Feng
2024-10-18 5:51 ` [POC 1/6] irq & spin_lock: Add counted interrupt disabling/enabling Boqun Feng
2024-10-21 7:04 ` kernel test robot
2024-10-21 7:35 ` kernel test robot
2024-10-21 20:44 ` Lyude Paul
2024-10-24 16:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-10-23 19:34 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-10-23 19:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-10-23 20:38 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-10-24 10:05 ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-10-24 17:22 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-10-24 21:57 ` Boqun Feng [this message]
2024-10-25 15:04 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-10-25 18:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-10-24 19:12 ` Lyude Paul
2025-07-24 20:36 ` w/r/t "irq & spin_lock: Add counted interrupt disabling/enabling": holes in pcpu_hot? Lyude Paul
2025-07-24 21:59 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-10-24 5:05 ` [POC 1/6] irq & spin_lock: Add counted interrupt disabling/enabling Boqun Feng
2024-10-24 8:17 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-10-24 16:20 ` Boqun Feng
2024-10-18 5:51 ` [POC 2/6] rust: Introduce interrupt module Boqun Feng
2024-10-31 20:45 ` Lyude Paul
2024-10-31 20:47 ` Lyude Paul
2024-10-18 5:51 ` [POC 3/6] rust: helper: Add spin_{un,}lock_irq_{enable,disable}() helpers Boqun Feng
2024-10-18 5:51 ` [POC 4/6] rust: sync: Add SpinLockIrq Boqun Feng
2024-10-18 19:23 ` Lyude Paul
2024-10-18 20:22 ` Boqun Feng
2024-10-18 5:51 ` [POC 5/6] rust: sync: Introduce lock::Backend::Context Boqun Feng
2024-10-31 20:54 ` Lyude Paul
2024-10-18 5:51 ` [POC 6/6] rust: sync: lock: Add `Backend::BackendInContext` Boqun Feng
2024-10-18 10:22 ` [POC 0/6] Allow SpinLockIrq to use a normal Guard interface Andreas Hindborg
2024-10-18 12:42 ` Boqun Feng
2024-10-18 11:16 ` Andreas Hindborg
2024-10-18 16:05 ` Dirk Behme
2024-10-31 20:56 ` Lyude Paul
2024-10-17 20:42 ` [PATCH v6 0/3] rust: Add irq abstraction, SpinLockIrq Lyude Paul
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZxrCrlg1XvaTtJ1I@boqun-archlinux \
--to=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=a.hindborg@samsung.com \
--cc=airlied@redhat.com \
--cc=alex.gaynor@gmail.com \
--cc=aliceryhl@google.com \
--cc=benno.lossin@proton.me \
--cc=bjorn3_gh@protonmail.com \
--cc=dakr@redhat.com \
--cc=dirk.behme@gmail.com \
--cc=gary@garyguo.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=lyude@redhat.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=ojeda@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tmgross@umich.edu \
--cc=wedsonaf@gmail.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox