From: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org>
To: Igor Korotin <igor.korotin.linux@gmail.com>
Cc: "Greg KH" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
"Len Brown" <lenb@kernel.org>, "Miguel Ojeda" <ojeda@kernel.org>,
"Alex Gaynor" <alex.gaynor@gmail.com>,
"Boqun Feng" <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
"Gary Guo" <gary@garyguo.net>,
"Björn Roy Baron" <bjorn3_gh@protonmail.com>,
"Benno Lossin" <benno.lossin@proton.me>,
"Andreas Hindborg" <a.hindborg@kernel.org>,
"Alice Ryhl" <aliceryhl@google.com>,
"Trevor Gross" <tmgross@umich.edu>,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rust: acpi: add `acpi::DeviceId` abstraction
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2025 15:23:38 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aD73Won8t4jlYYs_@cassiopeiae> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAG7QV936MPp7RLH_D6+K8mRcgPdpNsGFWF_D10b1C8op7YRtqA@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Jun 03, 2025 at 01:55:47PM +0100, Igor Korotin wrote:
> > Alternatively, if you want to upstream this dependency already you can send the
> > following patches:
> >
> > - this acpi::DeviceId abstraction
> > - the glue code for the generic adapter trait in rust/kernel/driver.rs
> > - use this glue code in the platform abstraction
> > - add acpi support to the platform sample driver
> >
> > This way we can already validate that the code works correctly. All this is
> > required anyways if the I2C device you write a driver for is on the platform
> > bus.
>
> A few questions if I may:
> 1. I committed to 4 different files: `acpi.rs`, `driver.rs`,
> `platform.rs`, platform rust sample driver.
> Should I commit all of this as one commit or split each part to a
> separate commit and send it as a patch sequence?
Every entry of my list above should be a separate commit. It might happen that
writing the glue code for the generic adapter trait in rust/kernel/driver.rs
breaks the build in the platform abstraction, then you have to fix it up in the
same commit, i.e. we never break the build. Please also see [1].
> 2. From author's point of view, as Danilo noticed, `acpi table`
> abstraction code is in general just copy-paste from `of table`
> abstraction code. How should I explicitly mark that fact?
You don't need to do anything specific here. You authored the commit, even
though it's based on existing code.
If you want you can add a note in the commit message that your case is based on
the OF table abstraction. But AFAIC, you don't have to.
[1] https://docs.kernel.org/process/submitting-patches.html#separate-your-changes
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-03 13:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-30 12:38 [PATCH] rust: acpi: add `acpi::DeviceId` abstraction Igor Korotin
2025-05-30 13:44 ` Greg KH
2025-05-30 14:43 ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-05-30 16:11 ` Igor Korotin
2025-05-31 5:49 ` Greg KH
2025-05-31 10:12 ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-06-03 12:55 ` Igor Korotin
2025-06-03 13:23 ` Danilo Krummrich [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aD73Won8t4jlYYs_@cassiopeiae \
--to=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=a.hindborg@kernel.org \
--cc=alex.gaynor@gmail.com \
--cc=aliceryhl@google.com \
--cc=benno.lossin@proton.me \
--cc=bjorn3_gh@protonmail.com \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=gary@garyguo.net \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=igor.korotin.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ojeda@kernel.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tmgross@umich.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).