From: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
To: Pekka Ristola <pekkarr@protonmail.com>
Cc: "Burak Emir" <bqe@google.com>,
"Yury Norov" <yury.norov@gmail.com>,
"Kees Cook" <kees@kernel.org>,
"Rasmus Villemoes" <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>,
"Viresh Kumar" <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
"Miguel Ojeda" <ojeda@kernel.org>,
"Alex Gaynor" <alex.gaynor@gmail.com>,
"Gary Guo" <gary@garyguo.net>,
"Björn Roy Baron" <bjorn3_gh@protonmail.com>,
"Benno Lossin" <benno.lossin@proton.me>,
"Andreas Hindborg" <a.hindborg@kernel.org>,
"Alice Ryhl" <aliceryhl@google.com>,
"Trevor Gross" <tmgross@umich.edu>,
"Gustavo A . R . Silva" <gustavoars@kernel.org>,
rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 3/5] rust: add bitmap API.
Date: Thu, 29 May 2025 13:07:21 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aDi-edjArUXl7Mq6@Mac.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250529193850.22210-1-pekkarr@protonmail.com>
On Thu, May 29, 2025 at 07:42:09PM +0000, Pekka Ristola wrote:
[...]
> > + }
> > +
> > + /// Copy `src` into this [`Bitmap`] and set any remaining bits to zero.
> > + ///
> > + /// # Examples
> > + ///
> > + /// ```
> > + /// use kernel::alloc::{AllocError, flags::GFP_KERNEL};
> > + /// use kernel::bitmap::Bitmap;
> > + ///
> > + /// let mut long_bitmap = Bitmap::new(256, GFP_KERNEL)?;
> > + //
> > + /// assert_eq!(None, long_bitmap.last_bit());
> > + //
> > + /// let mut short_bitmap = Bitmap::new(16, GFP_KERNEL)?;
> > + //
> > + /// short_bitmap.set_bit(7);
> > + /// long_bitmap.copy_and_extend(&short_bitmap);
> > + /// assert_eq!(Some(7), long_bitmap.last_bit());
> > + ///
> > + /// # Ok::<(), AllocError>(())
> > + /// ```
> > + #[inline]
> > + pub fn copy_and_extend(&mut self, src: &Bitmap) {
> > + let len = core::cmp::min(src.nbits, self.len());
> > + // SAFETY: access to `self` and `src` is within bounds.
> > + unsafe {
> > + bindings::bitmap_copy_and_extend(
> > + self.as_mut_ptr(),
> > + src.as_ptr(),
> > + len as u32,
> > + self.len() as u32,
> > + )
>
> Would this cause a data race if `src` is concurrently (atomically)
> modified? The C function seems to use a plain `memcpy` which is not atomic.
>
We need some better documentation on the effect of kernel C's
`memcpy()`-like functions regarding data races, but in general a kernel
C's `memcpy` can be treated as a volatile one (or per-byte atomic), so
it won't cause data race.
> > + };
> > + }
> > +
> > + /// Finds last set bit.
> > + ///
> > + /// # Examples
> > + ///
> > + /// ```
> > + /// use kernel::alloc::{AllocError, flags::GFP_KERNEL};
> > + /// use kernel::bitmap::Bitmap;
> > + ///
> > + /// let bitmap = Bitmap::new(64, GFP_KERNEL)?;
> > + ///
> > + /// match bitmap.last_bit() {
> > + /// Some(idx) => {
> > + /// pr_info!("The last bit has index {idx}.\n");
> > + /// }
> > + /// None => {
> > + /// pr_info!("All bits in this bitmap are 0.\n");
> > + /// }
> > + /// }
> > + /// # Ok::<(), AllocError>(())
> > + /// ```
> > + #[inline]
> > + pub fn last_bit(&self) -> Option<usize> {
> > + // SAFETY: `_find_next_bit` access is within bounds due to invariant.
> > + let index = unsafe { bindings::_find_last_bit(self.as_ptr(), self.len()) };
>
> The C function uses non-atomic reads, so this might cause data races too.
>
Similar here.
Regards,
Boqun
> > + if index >= self.len() {
> > + None
> > + } else {
> > + Some(index)
> > + }
> > + }
>
> Pekka
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-29 20:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-29 19:42 [PATCH v9 3/5] rust: add bitmap API Pekka Ristola
2025-05-29 20:07 ` Boqun Feng [this message]
2025-05-29 20:15 ` Pekka Ristola
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-05-26 15:01 [PATCH v9 0/5] rust: adds Bitmap API, ID pool and bindings Burak Emir
2025-05-26 15:01 ` [PATCH v9 3/5] rust: add bitmap API Burak Emir
2025-05-27 16:35 ` Boqun Feng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aDi-edjArUXl7Mq6@Mac.home \
--to=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=a.hindborg@kernel.org \
--cc=alex.gaynor@gmail.com \
--cc=aliceryhl@google.com \
--cc=benno.lossin@proton.me \
--cc=bjorn3_gh@protonmail.com \
--cc=bqe@google.com \
--cc=gary@garyguo.net \
--cc=gustavoars@kernel.org \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk \
--cc=ojeda@kernel.org \
--cc=pekkarr@protonmail.com \
--cc=rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tmgross@umich.edu \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
--cc=yury.norov@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).