From: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org>
To: Remo Senekowitsch <remo@buenzli.dev>
Cc: "Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
"Saravana Kannan" <saravanak@google.com>,
"Miguel Ojeda" <ojeda@kernel.org>,
"Alex Gaynor" <alex.gaynor@gmail.com>,
"Boqun Feng" <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
"Gary Guo" <gary@garyguo.net>,
"Björn Roy Baron" <bjorn3_gh@protonmail.com>,
"Benno Lossin" <lossin@kernel.org>,
"Andreas Hindborg" <a.hindborg@kernel.org>,
"Alice Ryhl" <aliceryhl@google.com>,
"Trevor Gross" <tmgross@umich.edu>,
"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
"Dirk Behme" <dirk.behme@de.bosch.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 0/9] More Rust bindings for device property reads
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2025 14:06:38 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aElxTuk4Nz1qGNpX@cassiopeiae> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250611102908.212514-1-remo@buenzli.dev>
Hi Remo,
On Wed, Jun 11, 2025 at 12:28:59PM +0200, Remo Senekowitsch wrote:
I went through the single patches and found the following issues.
> Remo Senekowitsch (9):
> rust: device: Create FwNode abstraction for accessing device
> properties
This patch creates a warning for FwNode::from_raw() to be unused, and needs this
fix:
diff --git a/rust/kernel/device/property.rs b/rust/kernel/device/property.rs
index 03850b7bb808..82ef54b54f18 100644
--- a/rust/kernel/device/property.rs
+++ b/rust/kernel/device/property.rs
@@ -37,6 +37,7 @@ impl FwNode {
/// - They relinquish that increment. That is, if there is only one
/// increment, callers must not use the underlying object anymore -- it is
/// only safe to do so via the newly created `ARef<FwNode>`.
+ #[expect(dead_code)]
unsafe fn from_raw(raw: *mut bindings::fwnode_handle) -> ARef<Self> {
// SAFETY: As per the safety requirements of this function:
// - `NonNull::new_unchecked`:
> rust: device: Enable accessing the FwNode of a Device
> rust: device: Move property_present() to FwNode
> rust: device: Enable printing fwnode name and path
This patch starts using FwNode::from_raw() and hence needs:
diff --git a/rust/kernel/device/property.rs b/rust/kernel/device/property.rs
index a5ebadd878d6..4cac335bad78 100644
--- a/rust/kernel/device/property.rs
+++ b/rust/kernel/device/property.rs
@@ -38,7 +38,6 @@ impl FwNode {
/// - They relinquish that increment. That is, if there is only one
/// increment, callers must not use the underlying object anymore -- it is
/// only safe to do so via the newly created `ARef<FwNode>`.
- #[expect(dead_code)]
unsafe fn from_raw(raw: *mut bindings::fwnode_handle) -> ARef<Self> {
// SAFETY: As per the safety requirements of this function:
// - `NonNull::new_unchecked`:
> rust: device: Introduce PropertyGuard
This patch fails to compile (print macros are not included) and needs the
following change.
diff --git a/rust/kernel/device/property.rs b/rust/kernel/device/property.rs
index a10033d310e6..1286669a9a40 100644
--- a/rust/kernel/device/property.rs
+++ b/rust/kernel/device/property.rs
@@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
use crate::{
bindings,
+ prelude::*,
str::CStr,
types::{ARef, Opaque},
};
> rust: device: Implement accessors for firmware properties
This patch also fails to compile, throws a warning about transmute() and hence
needs the following change.
diff --git a/rust/kernel/device/property.rs b/rust/kernel/device/property.rs
index 75621abe8117..fe0c5469a278 100644
--- a/rust/kernel/device/property.rs
+++ b/rust/kernel/device/property.rs
@@ -6,12 +6,12 @@
use core::{mem::MaybeUninit, ptr};
+use super::private::Sealed;
use crate::{
alloc::KVec,
bindings,
error::{to_result, Result},
prelude::*,
- private::Sealed,
str::{CStr, CString},
types::{ARef, Opaque},
};
@@ -303,7 +303,7 @@ fn read_array_from_fwnode_property<'a>(
// `&'a mut [Self]` is sound, because the previous call to a
// `fwnode_property_read_*_array` function (which didn't fail)
// fully initialized the slice.
- Ok(unsafe { core::mem::transmute(out) })
+ Ok(unsafe { core::mem::transmute::<&mut [MaybeUninit<Self>], &mut [Self]>(out) })
}
fn read_array_len_from_fwnode_property(fwnode: &FwNode, name: &CStr) -> Result<usize> {
> rust: device: Add child accessor and iterator
> rust: device: Add property_get_reference_args
> samples: rust: platform: Add property read examples
In general, please make sure to compile test every patch of a series
individually, not only the entire series.
Otherwise the series looks good. Given that the required fixes are minor, there
is no need for you to send a new version, I can apply those changes why I apply
the patch series.
- Danilo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-11 12:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-11 10:28 [PATCH v8 0/9] More Rust bindings for device property reads Remo Senekowitsch
2025-06-11 10:29 ` [PATCH v8 1/9] rust: device: Create FwNode abstraction for accessing device properties Remo Senekowitsch
2025-06-11 10:29 ` [PATCH v8 2/9] rust: device: Enable accessing the FwNode of a Device Remo Senekowitsch
2025-06-11 10:29 ` [PATCH v8 3/9] rust: device: Move property_present() to FwNode Remo Senekowitsch
2025-06-11 12:08 ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-06-12 3:13 ` Viresh Kumar
2025-06-11 10:29 ` [PATCH v8 4/9] rust: device: Enable printing fwnode name and path Remo Senekowitsch
2025-06-11 10:29 ` [PATCH v8 5/9] rust: device: Introduce PropertyGuard Remo Senekowitsch
2025-06-11 10:29 ` [PATCH v8 6/9] rust: device: Implement accessors for firmware properties Remo Senekowitsch
2025-06-11 10:29 ` [PATCH v8 7/9] rust: device: Add child accessor and iterator Remo Senekowitsch
2025-06-11 10:29 ` [PATCH v8 8/9] rust: device: Add property_get_reference_args Remo Senekowitsch
2025-06-11 10:29 ` [PATCH v8 9/9] samples: rust: platform: Add property read examples Remo Senekowitsch
2025-06-11 12:06 ` Danilo Krummrich [this message]
2025-06-12 23:31 ` [PATCH v8 0/9] More Rust bindings for device property reads Danilo Krummrich
2025-06-13 7:45 ` Remo Senekowitsch
2025-06-13 8:50 ` Danilo Krummrich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aElxTuk4Nz1qGNpX@cassiopeiae \
--to=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=a.hindborg@kernel.org \
--cc=alex.gaynor@gmail.com \
--cc=aliceryhl@google.com \
--cc=bjorn3_gh@protonmail.com \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dirk.behme@de.bosch.com \
--cc=gary@garyguo.net \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lossin@kernel.org \
--cc=ojeda@kernel.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=remo@buenzli.dev \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=saravanak@google.com \
--cc=tmgross@umich.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).