From: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
To: Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org,
lkmm@lists.linux.dev, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
"Miguel Ojeda" <ojeda@kernel.org>,
"Alex Gaynor" <alex.gaynor@gmail.com>,
"Gary Guo" <gary@garyguo.net>,
"Björn Roy Baron" <bjorn3_gh@protonmail.com>,
"Benno Lossin" <lossin@kernel.org>,
"Alice Ryhl" <aliceryhl@google.com>,
"Trevor Gross" <tmgross@umich.edu>,
"Danilo Krummrich" <dakr@kernel.org>,
"Will Deacon" <will@kernel.org>,
"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>,
"Mark Rutland" <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
"Wedson Almeida Filho" <wedsonaf@gmail.com>,
"Viresh Kumar" <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
"Lyude Paul" <lyude@redhat.com>, "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@kernel.org>,
"Mitchell Levy" <levymitchell0@gmail.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 02/10] rust: sync: Add basic atomic operation mapping framework
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2025 07:30:13 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aF6q9e4sQ-U1O3mS@Mac.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <878qle24et.fsf@kernel.org>
On Thu, Jun 26, 2025 at 12:17:14PM +0200, Andreas Hindborg wrote:
> "Boqun Feng" <boqun.feng@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > Preparation for generic atomic implementation. To unify the
> > implementation of a generic method over `i32` and `i64`, the C side
> > atomic methods need to be grouped so that in a generic method, they can
> > be referred as <type>::<method>, otherwise their parameters and return
> > value are different between `i32` and `i64`, which would require using
> > `transmute()` to unify the type into a `T`.
>
> I can't follow this, could you expand a bit?
>
So let's say I want to implement a generic `Atomic::load()`, without the
unification, what I can use are:
pub fn atomic_read(ptr: *mut i32) -> i32
and
pub fn atomic64_read(ptr: *mut i64) -> i64
and the implementation of `Atomic::load()` would be:
impl<T:...> Atomic<T> {
pub fn load(&self) -> T {
if size_of::<T> == 4 {
unsafe { transmute(atomic_read(self.0.get())) }
} else {
unsafe { transmute(atomic64_read(self.0.get())) }
}
}
}
because although load() is function of a generic struct, "if ... else
..." expression requires each branch has the same return type, so the
`transmute()` would be needed. What I meant was a trait method was
provided to `i32` and `i64`:
impl AtomicImpl for i32 {
fn atomic_read(ptr: *mut Self) -> Self;
}
impl AtomicImpl for i64 {
fn atomic_read(ptr: *mut Self) -> Self;
}
so that I could do:
impl<T:...> Atomic<T> {
pub fn load(&self) -> T {
T::atomic_read(self.0.get())
}
}
> >
> > Introduce `AtomicImpl` to represent a basic type in Rust that has the
> > direct mapping to an atomic implementation from C. This trait is sealed,
> > and currently only `i32` and `i64` impl this.
> >
> > Further, different methods are put into different `*Ops` trait groups,
> > and this is for the future when smaller types like `i8`/`i16` are
> > supported but only with a limited set of API (e.g. only set(), load(),
> > xchg() and cmpxchg(), no add() or sub() etc).
> >
> > While the atomic mod is introduced, documentation is also added for
> > memory models and data races.
> >
> > Also bump my role to the maintainer of ATOMIC INFRASTRUCTURE to reflect
> > my responsiblity on the Rust atomic mod.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
> > ---
> > MAINTAINERS | 4 +-
> > rust/kernel/sync.rs | 1 +
> > rust/kernel/sync/atomic.rs | 19 ++++
> > rust/kernel/sync/atomic/ops.rs | 199 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 4 files changed, 222 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > create mode 100644 rust/kernel/sync/atomic.rs
> > create mode 100644 rust/kernel/sync/atomic/ops.rs
> >
> > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> > index 0c1d245bf7b8..5eef524975ca 100644
> > --- a/MAINTAINERS
> > +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> > @@ -3894,7 +3894,7 @@ F: drivers/input/touchscreen/atmel_mxt_ts.c
> > ATOMIC INFRASTRUCTURE
> > M: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
> > M: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> > -R: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
> > +M: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
> > R: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> > L: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> > S: Maintained
> > @@ -3903,6 +3903,8 @@ F: arch/*/include/asm/atomic*.h
> > F: include/*/atomic*.h
> > F: include/linux/refcount.h
> > F: scripts/atomic/
> > +F: rust/kernel/sync/atomic.rs
> > +F: rust/kernel/sync/atomic/
> >
> > ATTO EXPRESSSAS SAS/SATA RAID SCSI DRIVER
> > M: Bradley Grove <linuxdrivers@attotech.com>
> > diff --git a/rust/kernel/sync.rs b/rust/kernel/sync.rs
> > index 36a719015583..b620027e0641 100644
> > --- a/rust/kernel/sync.rs
> > +++ b/rust/kernel/sync.rs
> > @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
> > use pin_init;
> >
> > mod arc;
> > +pub mod atomic;
> > mod condvar;
> > pub mod lock;
> > mod locked_by;
> > diff --git a/rust/kernel/sync/atomic.rs b/rust/kernel/sync/atomic.rs
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..65e41dba97b7
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/rust/kernel/sync/atomic.rs
> > @@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
> > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> > +
> > +//! Atomic primitives.
> > +//!
> > +//! These primitives have the same semantics as their C counterparts: and the precise definitions of
> > +//! semantics can be found at [`LKMM`]. Note that Linux Kernel Memory (Consistency) Model is the
> > +//! only model for Rust code in kernel, and Rust's own atomics should be avoided.
> > +//!
> > +//! # Data races
> > +//!
> > +//! [`LKMM`] atomics have different rules regarding data races:
> > +//!
> > +//! - A normal write from C side is treated as an atomic write if
> > +//! CONFIG_KCSAN_ASSUME_PLAIN_WRITES_ATOMIC=y.
> > +//! - Mixed-size atomic accesses don't cause data races.
> > +//!
> > +//! [`LKMM`]: srctree/tools/memory-mode/
> > +
> > +pub mod ops;
> > diff --git a/rust/kernel/sync/atomic/ops.rs b/rust/kernel/sync/atomic/ops.rs
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..f8825f7c84f0
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/rust/kernel/sync/atomic/ops.rs
> > @@ -0,0 +1,199 @@
> > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> > +
> > +//! Atomic implementations.
> > +//!
> > +//! Provides 1:1 mapping of atomic implementations.
> > +
> > +use crate::bindings::*;
> > +use crate::macros::paste;
> > +
> > +mod private {
> > + /// Sealed trait marker to disable customized impls on atomic implementation traits.
> > + pub trait Sealed {}
> > +}
> > +
> > +// `i32` and `i64` are only supported atomic implementations.
> > +impl private::Sealed for i32 {}
> > +impl private::Sealed for i64 {}
> > +
> > +/// A marker trait for types that implement atomic operations with C side primitives.
> > +///
> > +/// This trait is sealed, and only types that have directly mapping to the C side atomics should
> > +/// impl this:
> > +///
> > +/// - `i32` maps to `atomic_t`.
> > +/// - `i64` maps to `atomic64_t`.
> > +pub trait AtomicImpl: Sized + Send + Copy + private::Sealed {}
> > +
> > +// `atomic_t` implements atomic operations on `i32`.
> > +impl AtomicImpl for i32 {}
> > +
> > +// `atomic64_t` implements atomic operations on `i64`.
> > +impl AtomicImpl for i64 {}
> > +
> > +// This macro generates the function signature with given argument list and return type.
>
> Perhaps could we add an example expansion to make the macro easier for
> people to parse the first time:
>
That might be a good idea, I will see what I can. However, note that
these macros are only for internal usage (i.e. not an export macro)
similar to impl_item_type!() in configfs.rs, so you can just expand the
file to see the result.
Actually, I could use scripts (similar to patch #1) to generate these,
but was suggested to use macros instead.
The current hesitation from me is because I need to change these macros
and I would probably look into adding expansion examples when things are
stable (i.e. I don't need to change) again. So maybe not the next
version.
> declare_atomic_method!(
> read[acquire](ptr: *mut Self) -> Self
> );
>
> ->
>
> #[doc = "Atomic read_acquire"]
> ..
> unsafe fn atomic_read_acquire(ptr: *mut Self) -> Self;
>
> #[doc = "Atomic read"]
> ..
> unsafe fn atomic_read(ptr: *mut Self) -> Self;
>
>
[..]
>
> Lastly, perhaps we should do `ptr.cast()` rather than `as *mut _` ?
>
Sure, that makes sense. I missed that because clippy cannot work on
macro'd code?
Regards,
Boqun
>
> Best regards,
> Andreas Hindborg
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-27 14:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 82+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-18 16:49 [PATCH v5 00/10] LKMM generic atomics in Rust Boqun Feng
2025-06-18 16:49 ` [PATCH v5 01/10] rust: Introduce atomic API helpers Boqun Feng
2025-06-26 8:44 ` Andreas Hindborg
2025-06-27 14:00 ` Boqun Feng
2025-06-18 16:49 ` [PATCH v5 02/10] rust: sync: Add basic atomic operation mapping framework Boqun Feng
2025-06-26 8:50 ` Andreas Hindborg
2025-06-26 10:17 ` Andreas Hindborg
2025-06-27 14:30 ` Boqun Feng [this message]
2025-06-18 16:49 ` [PATCH v5 03/10] rust: sync: atomic: Add ordering annotation types Boqun Feng
2025-06-19 10:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-19 12:19 ` Alice Ryhl
2025-06-19 13:29 ` Boqun Feng
2025-06-19 14:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-19 15:00 ` Boqun Feng
2025-06-19 15:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-19 15:15 ` Boqun Feng
2025-06-19 18:04 ` Alan Stern
2025-06-21 11:18 ` Gary Guo
2025-06-23 2:48 ` Boqun Feng
2025-06-26 12:36 ` Andreas Hindborg
2025-06-27 14:34 ` Boqun Feng
2025-06-27 14:44 ` Boqun Feng
2025-06-18 16:49 ` [PATCH v5 04/10] rust: sync: atomic: Add generic atomics Boqun Feng
2025-06-21 11:32 ` Gary Guo
2025-06-23 5:19 ` Boqun Feng
2025-06-23 11:54 ` Benno Lossin
2025-06-23 12:58 ` Boqun Feng
2025-06-23 18:30 ` Gary Guo
2025-06-23 19:09 ` Boqun Feng
2025-06-23 23:27 ` Benno Lossin
2025-06-24 16:35 ` Boqun Feng
2025-06-26 13:54 ` Benno Lossin
2025-07-04 21:22 ` Boqun Feng
2025-07-04 22:05 ` Benno Lossin
2025-07-04 22:30 ` Boqun Feng
2025-07-04 22:49 ` Benno Lossin
2025-07-04 23:21 ` Boqun Feng
2025-07-04 20:25 ` Boqun Feng
2025-07-04 20:45 ` Benno Lossin
2025-07-04 21:17 ` Boqun Feng
2025-07-04 22:38 ` Benno Lossin
2025-07-04 23:21 ` Boqun Feng
2025-07-05 8:04 ` Benno Lossin
2025-07-05 15:38 ` Boqun Feng
2025-07-05 21:43 ` Benno Lossin
2025-06-26 12:15 ` Andreas Hindborg
2025-06-27 15:01 ` Boqun Feng
2025-06-30 9:52 ` Andreas Hindborg
2025-06-30 14:44 ` Alan Stern
2025-07-01 8:54 ` Andreas Hindborg
2025-07-01 14:50 ` Boqun Feng
2025-07-02 8:33 ` Andreas Hindborg
2025-06-18 16:49 ` [PATCH v5 05/10] rust: sync: atomic: Add atomic {cmp,}xchg operations Boqun Feng
2025-06-21 11:37 ` Gary Guo
2025-06-23 5:23 ` Boqun Feng
2025-06-26 13:12 ` Andreas Hindborg
2025-06-28 3:03 ` Boqun Feng
2025-06-30 10:16 ` Andreas Hindborg
2025-06-30 14:51 ` Alan Stern
2025-06-30 15:12 ` Boqun Feng
2025-06-27 8:58 ` Benno Lossin
2025-06-27 13:53 ` Boqun Feng
2025-06-28 6:12 ` Benno Lossin
2025-06-28 7:31 ` Boqun Feng
2025-06-28 8:00 ` Benno Lossin
2025-06-30 15:24 ` Boqun Feng
2025-06-30 15:27 ` Boqun Feng
2025-06-30 15:50 ` Benno Lossin
2025-06-18 16:49 ` [PATCH v5 06/10] rust: sync: atomic: Add the framework of arithmetic operations Boqun Feng
2025-06-21 11:41 ` Gary Guo
2025-06-26 12:39 ` Andreas Hindborg
2025-06-28 3:04 ` Boqun Feng
2025-06-18 16:49 ` [PATCH v5 07/10] rust: sync: atomic: Add Atomic<u{32,64}> Boqun Feng
2025-06-26 12:47 ` Andreas Hindborg
2025-06-18 16:49 ` [PATCH v5 08/10] rust: sync: atomic: Add Atomic<{usize,isize}> Boqun Feng
2025-06-26 12:49 ` Andreas Hindborg
2025-06-18 16:49 ` [PATCH v5 09/10] rust: sync: atomic: Add Atomic<*mut T> Boqun Feng
2025-06-18 16:49 ` [PATCH v5 10/10] rust: sync: Add memory barriers Boqun Feng
2025-06-26 13:36 ` Andreas Hindborg
2025-06-28 3:42 ` Boqun Feng
2025-06-30 9:54 ` Andreas Hindborg
2025-06-18 20:22 ` [PATCH v5 00/10] LKMM generic atomics in Rust Alice Ryhl
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aF6q9e4sQ-U1O3mS@Mac.home \
--to=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=a.hindborg@kernel.org \
--cc=alex.gaynor@gmail.com \
--cc=aliceryhl@google.com \
--cc=bjorn3_gh@protonmail.com \
--cc=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=gary@garyguo.net \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=levymitchell0@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkmm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=lossin@kernel.org \
--cc=lyude@redhat.com \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=ojeda@kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tmgross@umich.edu \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
--cc=wedsonaf@gmail.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).