Re: [PATCH 2/4] rust: devres: replace Devres::new_foreign_owned()

[Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org>]

On Sun, Jun 22, 2025 at 09:42:03AM +0200, Benno Lossin wrote:
> On Sat Jun 21, 2025 at 11:45 PM CEST, Danilo Krummrich wrote:
> > I feel like the name pretty much nails it: it's a new instance that is not
> > owned, by the Rust side, but by the C devres implementation (i.e. foreign
> > owned), which automatically drops it when the device is unbound.
> 
> Yeah, but `foreign` is so unspecific... With `ForeignOwnable`, it makes
> sense, since it could be anything.
> 
> > Maybe Registration::new_devres_owned() instead?
> 
> I like that one better, let's go with that.

SGTM, but please note that this is unrelated to this patch; will create an issue
for renaming those.

> > Hm, I think attach_data() doesn't quite hit the point. Maybe just
> > devres::register_owned() instead. I agree that 'boxed' is an unnecessary
> > implementation detail.
> 
> I like `register_owned` better, but I'm not 100% convinced by the
> `owned` part... The regular devres creation is called `Devres::new`,
> right? How about we just call this `register`?

In general, devres::register() is fine for me too. But note that it looses a bit
the indicator that the ownership of the object is entirely transferred to
devres, in contrast to the Devres container type.