From: Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com>
To: Mitchell Levy <levymitchell0@gmail.com>
Cc: "Miguel Ojeda" <ojeda@kernel.org>,
"Alex Gaynor" <alex.gaynor@gmail.com>,
"Boqun Feng" <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
"Gary Guo" <gary@garyguo.net>,
"Björn Roy Baron" <bjorn3_gh@protonmail.com>,
"Andreas Hindborg" <a.hindborg@kernel.org>,
"Alice Ryhl" <aliceryhl@google.com>,
"Trevor Gross" <tmgross@umich.edu>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Dennis Zhou" <dennis@kernel.org>, "Tejun Heo" <tj@kernel.org>,
"Christoph Lameter" <cl@linux.com>,
"Danilo Krummrich" <dakr@kernel.org>,
"Benno Lossin" <lossin@kernel.org>,
"Viresh Kumar" <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
"Tyler Hicks" <code@tyhicks.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/7] rust: percpu: Support non-zeroable types for DynamicPerCpu
Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2025 18:19:25 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aLi-7W21N45fBGJk@yury> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250828-rust-percpu-v3-5-4dd92e1e7904@gmail.com>
On Thu, Aug 28, 2025 at 12:00:12PM -0700, Mitchell Levy wrote:
> Add functionality to `PerCpuPtr` to compute pointers to per-CPU variable
> slots on other CPUs. Use this facility to initialize per-CPU variables
> on all possible CPUs when a dynamic per-CPU variable is created with a
> non-zeroable type. Since `RefCell` and other `Cell`-like types fall into
> this category, `impl CheckedPerCpu` on `DynamicPerCpu` for these
> `InteriorMutable` types since they can now be used. Add examples of
> these usages to `samples/rust/rust_percpu.rs`.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mitchell Levy <levymitchell0@gmail.com>
> ---
> rust/helpers/percpu.c | 5 +++
> rust/kernel/percpu.rs | 15 +++++++
> rust/kernel/percpu/dynamic.rs | 40 +++++++++++++++++
> samples/rust/rust_percpu.rs | 99 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> 4 files changed, 152 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/rust/helpers/percpu.c b/rust/helpers/percpu.c
> index 8cc01d094752..8d83b6b86106 100644
> --- a/rust/helpers/percpu.c
> +++ b/rust/helpers/percpu.c
> @@ -8,6 +8,11 @@ void __percpu *rust_helper_alloc_percpu(size_t sz, size_t align)
> return __alloc_percpu(sz, align);
> }
>
> +void *rust_helper_per_cpu_ptr(void __percpu *ptr, unsigned int cpu)
> +{
> + return per_cpu_ptr(ptr, cpu);
> +}
> +
> void rust_helper_on_each_cpu(smp_call_func_t func, void *info, int wait)
> {
> on_each_cpu(func, info, wait);
> diff --git a/rust/kernel/percpu.rs b/rust/kernel/percpu.rs
> index 35afcdba3ccd..c68c7520b67f 100644
> --- a/rust/kernel/percpu.rs
> +++ b/rust/kernel/percpu.rs
> @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
> use bindings::{alloc_percpu, free_percpu};
>
> use crate::alloc::Flags;
> +use crate::cpu::CpuId;
> use crate::percpu::cpu_guard::CpuGuard;
> use crate::prelude::*;
> use crate::sync::Arc;
> @@ -115,6 +116,20 @@ pub fn get_ptr(&self) -> *mut MaybeUninit<T> {
> // the invariant that self.0 is a valid offset into the per-CPU area.
> (this_cpu_area).wrapping_add(self.0 as usize).cast()
> }
> +
> + /// Get a `*mut MaybeUninit<T>` to the per-CPU variable on the CPU represented by `cpu`. Note
> + /// that without some kind of synchronization, use of the returned pointer may cause a data
> + /// race. It is the caller's responsibility to use the returned pointer in a reasonable way.
> + ///
> + /// # Safety
> + /// - The returned pointer is valid only if `self` is (that is, it points to a live allocation
> + /// correctly sized and aligned to hold a `T`)
> + /// - The returned pointer is valid only if the bit corresponding to `cpu` is set in
> + /// `Cpumask::possible()`.
Instead of explaining those rules in comments, can you just enforce
them in code? Not sure about the 1st rule, but the 2nd one looks like
a trivial check.
> + pub unsafe fn get_remote_ptr(&self, cpu: CpuId) -> *mut MaybeUninit<T> {
> + // SAFETY: The requirements of this function ensure this call is safe.
> + unsafe { bindings::per_cpu_ptr(self.0.cast(), cpu.as_u32()) }.cast()
> + }
> }
>
> // SAFETY: Sending a `PerCpuPtr<T>` to another thread is safe because as soon as it's sent, the
> diff --git a/rust/kernel/percpu/dynamic.rs b/rust/kernel/percpu/dynamic.rs
> index ce95e420f943..64f04cef3705 100644
> --- a/rust/kernel/percpu/dynamic.rs
> +++ b/rust/kernel/percpu/dynamic.rs
> @@ -3,6 +3,8 @@
>
> use super::*;
>
> +use crate::cpumask::Cpumask;
> +
> /// Represents a dynamic allocation of a per-CPU variable via alloc_percpu. Calls free_percpu when
> /// dropped.
> pub struct PerCpuAllocation<T>(PerCpuPtr<T>);
> @@ -74,6 +76,36 @@ pub fn new_zero(flags: Flags) -> Option<Self> {
> }
> }
>
> +impl<T: Clone> DynamicPerCpu<T> {
> + /// Allocates a new per-CPU variable
> + ///
> + /// # Arguments
> + /// * `val` - The initial value of the per-CPU variable on all CPUs.
> + /// * `flags` - Flags used to allocate an `Arc` that keeps track of the underlying
> + /// `PerCpuAllocation`.
> + pub fn new_with(val: T, flags: Flags) -> Option<Self> {
> + let alloc: PerCpuAllocation<T> = PerCpuAllocation::new_uninit()?;
> + let ptr = alloc.0;
> +
> + for cpu in Cpumask::possible().iter() {
In C we've got the 'for_each_possible_cpu()'. Is there any way to
preserve that semantics in rust? I really believe that similar
semantics on higher level on both sides will help _a_lot_ for those
transitioning into the rust world (like me).
Thanks,
Yury
> + // SAFETY: `ptr` is a valid allocation, and `cpu` appears in `Cpumask::possible()`
> + let remote_ptr = unsafe { ptr.get_remote_ptr(cpu) };
> + // SAFETY: Each CPU's slot corresponding to `ptr` is currently uninitialized, and no
> + // one else has a reference to it. Therefore, we can freely write to it without
> + // worrying about the need to drop what was there or whether we're racing with someone
> + // else. `PerCpuPtr::get_remote_ptr` guarantees that the pointer is valid since we
> + // derived it from a valid allocation and `cpu`.
> + unsafe {
> + (*remote_ptr).write(val.clone());
> + }
> + }
> +
> + let arc = Arc::new(alloc, flags).ok()?;
> +
> + Some(Self { alloc: arc })
> + }
> +}
> +
> impl<T> PerCpu<T> for DynamicPerCpu<T> {
> unsafe fn get_mut(&mut self, guard: CpuGuard) -> PerCpuToken<'_, T> {
> // SAFETY: The requirements of `PerCpu::get_mut` and this type's invariant ensure that the
> @@ -81,3 +113,11 @@ unsafe fn get_mut(&mut self, guard: CpuGuard) -> PerCpuToken<'_, T> {
> unsafe { PerCpuToken::new(guard, &self.alloc.0) }
> }
> }
> +
> +impl<T: InteriorMutable> CheckedPerCpu<T> for DynamicPerCpu<T> {
> + fn get(&mut self, guard: CpuGuard) -> CheckedPerCpuToken<'_, T> {
> + // SAFETY: By the invariant of `DynamicPerCpu`, the memory location in each CPU's
> + // per-CPU area corresponding to this variable has been initialized.
> + unsafe { CheckedPerCpuToken::new(guard, &self.alloc.0) }
> + }
> +}
> diff --git a/samples/rust/rust_percpu.rs b/samples/rust/rust_percpu.rs
> index 98ca1c781b6b..06b322019134 100644
> --- a/samples/rust/rust_percpu.rs
> +++ b/samples/rust/rust_percpu.rs
> @@ -130,13 +130,72 @@ fn init(_module: &'static ThisModule) -> Result<Self, Error> {
>
> // SAFETY: No prerequisites for on_each_cpu.
> unsafe {
> - on_each_cpu(Some(inc_percpu), (&raw mut test).cast(), 0);
> - on_each_cpu(Some(inc_percpu), (&raw mut test).cast(), 0);
> - on_each_cpu(Some(inc_percpu), (&raw mut test).cast(), 0);
> - on_each_cpu(Some(inc_percpu), (&raw mut test).cast(), 1);
> - on_each_cpu(Some(check_percpu), (&raw mut test).cast(), 1);
> + on_each_cpu(Some(inc_percpu_u64), (&raw mut test).cast(), 0);
> + on_each_cpu(Some(inc_percpu_u64), (&raw mut test).cast(), 0);
> + on_each_cpu(Some(inc_percpu_u64), (&raw mut test).cast(), 0);
> + on_each_cpu(Some(inc_percpu_u64), (&raw mut test).cast(), 1);
> + on_each_cpu(Some(check_percpu_u64), (&raw mut test).cast(), 1);
> }
>
> + let mut checked: DynamicPerCpu<RefCell<u64>> =
> + DynamicPerCpu::new_with(RefCell::new(100), GFP_KERNEL).unwrap();
> +
> + // SAFETY: No prerequisites for on_each_cpu.
> + unsafe {
> + on_each_cpu(Some(inc_percpu_refcell_u64), (&raw mut checked).cast(), 0);
> + on_each_cpu(Some(inc_percpu_refcell_u64), (&raw mut checked).cast(), 0);
> + on_each_cpu(Some(inc_percpu_refcell_u64), (&raw mut checked).cast(), 0);
> + on_each_cpu(Some(inc_percpu_refcell_u64), (&raw mut checked).cast(), 1);
> + on_each_cpu(Some(check_percpu_refcell_u64), (&raw mut checked).cast(), 1);
> + }
> +
> + checked.get(CpuGuard::new()).with(|val: &RefCell<u64>| {
> + assert!(*val.borrow() == 104);
> +
> + let mut checked_native = 0;
> + *val.borrow_mut() = 0;
> +
> + checked_native += 1;
> + *val.borrow_mut() += 1;
> + pr_info!(
> + "Checked native: {}, *checked: {}\n",
> + checked_native,
> + val.borrow()
> + );
> + assert!(checked_native == *val.borrow() && checked_native == 1);
> +
> + checked_native = checked_native.wrapping_add((-1i64) as u64);
> + val.replace_with(|old: &mut u64| old.wrapping_add((-1i64) as u64));
> + pr_info!(
> + "Checked native: {}, *checked: {}\n",
> + checked_native,
> + val.borrow()
> + );
> + assert!(checked_native == *val.borrow() && checked_native == 0);
> +
> + checked_native = checked_native.wrapping_add((-1i64) as u64);
> + val.replace_with(|old: &mut u64| old.wrapping_add((-1i64) as u64));
> + pr_info!(
> + "Checked native: {}, *checked: {}\n",
> + checked_native,
> + val.borrow()
> + );
> + assert!(checked_native == *val.borrow() && checked_native == (-1i64) as u64);
> +
> + checked_native = 0;
> + *val.borrow_mut() = 0;
> +
> + checked_native = checked_native.wrapping_sub(1);
> + val.replace_with(|old: &mut u64| old.wrapping_sub(1));
> + pr_info!(
> + "Checked native: {}, *checked: {}\n",
> + checked_native,
> + val.borrow()
> + );
> + assert!(checked_native == *val.borrow() && checked_native == (-1i64) as u64);
> + assert!(checked_native == *val.borrow() && checked_native == u64::MAX);
> + });
> +
> pr_info!("rust dynamic percpu test done\n");
>
> // Return Err to unload the module
> @@ -144,7 +203,7 @@ fn init(_module: &'static ThisModule) -> Result<Self, Error> {
> }
> }
>
> -extern "C" fn inc_percpu(info: *mut c_void) {
> +extern "C" fn inc_percpu_u64(info: *mut c_void) {
> // SAFETY: We know that info is a void *const DynamicPerCpu<u64> and DynamicPerCpu<u64> is Send.
> let mut pcpu = unsafe { (*(info as *const DynamicPerCpu<u64>)).clone() };
> pr_info!("Incrementing on {}\n", CpuId::current().as_u32());
> @@ -153,7 +212,7 @@ extern "C" fn inc_percpu(info: *mut c_void) {
> unsafe { pcpu.get_mut(CpuGuard::new()) }.with(|val: &mut u64| *val += 1);
> }
>
> -extern "C" fn check_percpu(info: *mut c_void) {
> +extern "C" fn check_percpu_u64(info: *mut c_void) {
> // SAFETY: We know that info is a void *const DynamicPerCpu<u64> and DynamicPerCpu<u64> is Send.
> let mut pcpu = unsafe { (*(info as *const DynamicPerCpu<u64>)).clone() };
> pr_info!("Asserting on {}\n", CpuId::current().as_u32());
> @@ -161,3 +220,29 @@ extern "C" fn check_percpu(info: *mut c_void) {
> // SAFETY: We don't have multiple clones of pcpu in scope
> unsafe { pcpu.get_mut(CpuGuard::new()) }.with(|val: &mut u64| assert!(*val == 4));
> }
> +
> +extern "C" fn inc_percpu_refcell_u64(info: *mut c_void) {
> + // SAFETY: We know that info is a void *const DynamicPerCpu<RefCell<u64>> and
> + // DynamicPerCpu<RefCell<u64>> is Send.
> + let mut pcpu = unsafe { (*(info as *const DynamicPerCpu<RefCell<u64>>)).clone() };
> + // SAFETY: smp_processor_id has no preconditions
> + pr_info!("Incrementing on {}\n", CpuId::current().as_u32());
> +
> + pcpu.get(CpuGuard::new()).with(|val: &RefCell<u64>| {
> + let mut val = val.borrow_mut();
> + *val += 1;
> + });
> +}
> +
> +extern "C" fn check_percpu_refcell_u64(info: *mut c_void) {
> + // SAFETY: We know that info is a void *const DynamicPerCpu<RefCell<u64>> and
> + // DynamicPerCpu<RefCell<u64>> is Send.
> + let mut pcpu = unsafe { (*(info as *const DynamicPerCpu<RefCell<u64>>)).clone() };
> + // SAFETY: smp_processor_id has no preconditions
> + pr_info!("Asserting on {}\n", CpuId::current().as_u32());
> +
> + pcpu.get(CpuGuard::new()).with(|val: &RefCell<u64>| {
> + let val = val.borrow();
> + assert!(*val == 104);
> + });
> +}
>
> --
> 2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-03 22:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-28 19:00 [PATCH v3 0/7] rust: Add Per-CPU Variable API Mitchell Levy
2025-08-28 19:00 ` [PATCH v3 1/7] rust: percpu: introduce a rust API for per-CPU variables Mitchell Levy
2025-09-03 21:42 ` Yury Norov
2025-09-04 19:53 ` Mitchell Levy
2025-09-04 20:27 ` Yury Norov
2025-09-04 21:17 ` Mitchell Levy
2025-08-28 19:00 ` [PATCH v3 2/7] rust: percpu: add a rust per-CPU variable sample Mitchell Levy
2025-08-28 19:00 ` [PATCH v3 3/7] rust: cpumask: Add a `Cpumask` iterator Mitchell Levy
2025-08-29 5:19 ` Viresh Kumar
2025-08-28 19:00 ` [PATCH v3 4/7] rust: cpumask: Add getters for globally defined cpumasks Mitchell Levy
2025-08-29 5:20 ` Viresh Kumar
2025-09-03 22:03 ` Yury Norov
2025-09-04 19:55 ` Mitchell Levy
2025-08-28 19:00 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] rust: percpu: Support non-zeroable types for DynamicPerCpu Mitchell Levy
2025-09-03 22:19 ` Yury Norov [this message]
2025-09-04 20:26 ` Mitchell Levy
2025-09-04 20:37 ` Yury Norov
2025-09-04 21:05 ` Mitchell Levy
2025-09-04 21:46 ` Yury Norov
2025-09-04 21:57 ` Miguel Ojeda
2025-09-03 23:05 ` Miguel Ojeda
2025-09-04 20:17 ` Mitchell Levy
2025-09-04 20:37 ` Miguel Ojeda
2025-09-04 21:50 ` Mitchell Levy
2025-08-28 19:00 ` [PATCH v3 6/7] rust: percpu: Add pin-hole optimizations for numerics Mitchell Levy
2025-08-28 19:00 ` [PATCH v3 7/7] rust: percpu: cache per-CPU pointers in the dynamic case Mitchell Levy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aLi-7W21N45fBGJk@yury \
--to=yury.norov@gmail.com \
--cc=a.hindborg@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alex.gaynor@gmail.com \
--cc=aliceryhl@google.com \
--cc=bjorn3_gh@protonmail.com \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=code@tyhicks.com \
--cc=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=dennis@kernel.org \
--cc=gary@garyguo.net \
--cc=levymitchell0@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lossin@kernel.org \
--cc=ojeda@kernel.org \
--cc=rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=tmgross@umich.edu \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).