From: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com>
To: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org>
Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, rafael@kernel.org, ojeda@kernel.org,
alex.gaynor@gmail.com, boqun.feng@gmail.com, gary@garyguo.net,
bjorn3_gh@protonmail.com, lossin@kernel.org,
a.hindborg@kernel.org, tmgross@umich.edu, mmaurer@google.com,
rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/8] rust: uaccess: add UserSliceWriter::write_slice_partial()
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2025 08:22:14 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aPiUNmAfbefKW__4@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DDO2PI0D2L6Q.3OPXNQOV7Y0H6@kernel.org>
On Tue, Oct 21, 2025 at 04:34:49PM +0200, Danilo Krummrich wrote:
> On Tue Oct 21, 2025 at 4:18 PM CEST, Alice Ryhl wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 21, 2025 at 04:14:22PM +0200, Danilo Krummrich wrote:
> >> On Tue Oct 21, 2025 at 4:00 PM CEST, Alice Ryhl wrote:
> >> > On Tue, Oct 21, 2025 at 12:26:15AM +0200, Danilo Krummrich wrote:
> >> >> The existing write_slice() method is a wrapper around copy_to_user() and
> >> >> expects the user buffer to be larger than the source buffer.
> >> >>
> >> >> However, userspace may split up reads in multiple partial operations
> >> >> providing an offset into the source buffer and a smaller user buffer.
> >> >>
> >> >> In order to support this common case, provide a helper for partial
> >> >> writes.
> >> >>
> >> >> Signed-off-by: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org>
> >> >> rust/kernel/uaccess.rs | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >> >> 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+)
> >> >>
> >> >> diff --git a/rust/kernel/uaccess.rs b/rust/kernel/uaccess.rs
> >> >> index 2061a7e10c65..40d47e94b54f 100644
> >> >> --- a/rust/kernel/uaccess.rs
> >> >> +++ b/rust/kernel/uaccess.rs
> >> >> @@ -463,6 +463,30 @@ pub fn write_slice(&mut self, data: &[u8]) -> Result {
> >> >> Ok(())
> >> >> }
> >> >>
> >> >> + /// Writes raw data to this user pointer from a kernel buffer partially.
> >> >> + ///
> >> >> + /// This is the same as [`Self::write_slice`] but considers the given `offset` into `data` and
> >> >> + /// truncates the write to the boundaries of `self` and `data`.
> >> >> + ///
> >> >> + /// On success, returns the number of bytes written.
> >> >> + pub fn write_slice_partial(&mut self, data: &[u8], offset: file::Offset) -> Result<usize> {
> >> >
> >> > I think for the current function signature, it's kind of weird to take a
> >> > file::Offset parameter
> >> >
> >> > On one hand, it is described like a generic function for writing a
> >> > partial slice, and if that's what it is, then I would argue it should
> >> > take usize because it's an offset into the slice.
> >> >
> >> > On another hand, I think what you're actually trying to do is implement
> >> > the simple_[read_from|write_to]_buffer utilities for user slices, but
> >> > it's only a "partial" version of those utilities. The full utility takes
> >> > a `&mut loff_t` so that it can also perform the required modification to
> >> > the offset.
> >>
> >> Originally, it was intended to be the latter. And, in fact, earlier code (that
> >> did not git the mailing list) had a &mut file::Offset argument (was &mut i64
> >> back then).
> >>
> >> However, for the version I sent to the list I chose the former because I
> >> considered it to be more flexible.
> >>
> >> Now, in v2, it's indeed a bit mixed up. I think what we should do is to have
> >> both
> >>
> >> fn write_slice_partial(&mut self, data: &[u8], offset: usize) -> Result<usize>
> >>
> >> and
> >>
> >> fn write_slice_???(&mut self, data: &[u8], offset: &mut file::Offset) -> Result<usize>
> >>
> >> which can forward to write_slice_partial() and update the buffer.
> >
> > SGTM.
> >
> >> Any name suggestions?
> >
> > I would suggest keeping the name of the equivalent C method:
> > simple_read_from_buffer/simple_write_to_buffer
>
> Hm..that's an option, but UserSliceWriter corresponds to
> simple_read_from_buffer() and UserSliceReader corresponds to
> simple_write_to_buffer().
>
> I think having UserSliceWriter::simple_read_from_buffer() while we have
> UserSliceWriter::write_slice() is confusing. But swapping the semantics of
> simple_read_from_buffer() and simple_write_to_buffer() is even more confusing.
>
> So, I think using the existing names is not a great fit.
>
> Maybe something like write_file_slice() or write_slice_file()? The former could
> be read as "slice of files" which would be misleading though.
It's tricky. Perhaps if you make them standalone functions, then using
the simple_read_from_buffer naming is less confusing? Then it's just
kernel::uaccess::simple_read_from_buffer() and it takes a
UserSliceWriter.
Alice
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-22 8:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-20 22:26 [PATCH v2 0/8] Binary Large Objects for Rust DebugFS Danilo Krummrich
2025-10-20 22:26 ` [PATCH v2 1/8] rust: fs: add file::Offset type alias Danilo Krummrich
2025-10-21 13:40 ` Alice Ryhl
2025-10-21 15:08 ` Miguel Ojeda
2025-10-21 15:26 ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-10-21 16:00 ` Miguel Ojeda
2025-10-21 16:25 ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-10-21 16:47 ` Miguel Ojeda
2025-10-21 17:34 ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-10-21 23:16 ` Miguel Ojeda
2025-10-29 12:49 ` Christian Brauner
2025-10-29 15:26 ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-10-20 22:26 ` [PATCH v2 2/8] rust: uaccess: add UserSliceReader::read_slice_partial() Danilo Krummrich
2025-10-20 22:26 ` [PATCH v2 3/8] rust: uaccess: add UserSliceWriter::write_slice_partial() Danilo Krummrich
2025-10-21 14:00 ` Alice Ryhl
2025-10-21 14:14 ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-10-21 14:18 ` Alice Ryhl
2025-10-21 14:34 ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-10-22 8:22 ` Alice Ryhl [this message]
2025-10-22 9:06 ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-10-20 22:26 ` [PATCH v2 4/8] rust: debugfs: support for binary large objects Danilo Krummrich
2025-10-21 14:03 ` Alice Ryhl
2025-10-22 5:58 ` Alexandre Courbot
2025-10-20 22:26 ` [PATCH v2 5/8] rust: debugfs: support blobs from smart pointers Danilo Krummrich
2025-10-22 5:57 ` Alexandre Courbot
2025-10-22 9:34 ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-10-20 22:26 ` [PATCH v2 6/8] samples: rust: debugfs: add example for blobs Danilo Krummrich
2025-10-20 22:26 ` [PATCH v2 7/8] rust: debugfs: support binary large objects for ScopedDir Danilo Krummrich
2025-10-20 22:26 ` [PATCH v2 8/8] samples: rust: debugfs_scoped: add example for blobs Danilo Krummrich
2025-10-21 7:09 ` [PATCH v2 0/8] Binary Large Objects for Rust DebugFS Greg KH
2025-10-21 21:26 ` Matthew Maurer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aPiUNmAfbefKW__4@google.com \
--to=aliceryhl@google.com \
--cc=a.hindborg@kernel.org \
--cc=alex.gaynor@gmail.com \
--cc=bjorn3_gh@protonmail.com \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=gary@garyguo.net \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lossin@kernel.org \
--cc=mmaurer@google.com \
--cc=ojeda@kernel.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tmgross@umich.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).