rust-for-linux.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com>
To: "Onur Özkan" <work@onurozkan.dev>
Cc: rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org, lossin@kernel.org,
	lyude@redhat.com,  ojeda@kernel.org, alex.gaynor@gmail.com,
	boqun.feng@gmail.com,  gary@garyguo.net, a.hindborg@kernel.org,
	tmgross@umich.edu, dakr@kernel.org,  peterz@infradead.org,
	mingo@redhat.com, will@kernel.org, longman@redhat.com,
	 felipe_life@live.com, daniel@sedlak.dev,
	daniel.almeida@collabora.com,  thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 4/6] rust: implement Class for ww_class support
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2025 13:10:44 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aTA21F_fXA-xS34P@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251201102855.4413-5-work@onurozkan.dev>

On Mon, Dec 01, 2025 at 01:28:53PM +0300, Onur Özkan wrote:
> Adds the Class type, the first step in supporting
> ww_mutex in Rust. Class represents ww_class, used
> for deadlock avoidance for supporting both wait-die
> and wound-wait semantics.
> 
> Also adds the define_class macro for safely declaring
> static instances.

> +impl Class {
> +    /// Creates an unpinned [`Class`].
> +    ///
> +    /// # Safety
> +    ///
> +    /// Caller must guarantee that the returned value is not moved after creation.

The value is moved when you return it. Perhaps you meant that it must be
pinned before first use?

> +                            // TODO: Replace with `bindings::lock_class_key::default()` once
> +                            // stabilized for `const`.
> +                            //
> +                            // SAFETY: This is always zero-initialized when defined with
> +                            // `DEFINE_WD_CLASS` globally on C side.
> +                            //
> +                            // For reference, see __WW_CLASS_INITIALIZER() in
> +                            // "include/linux/ww_mutex.h".
> +                            acquire_key: core::mem::zeroed(),
> +                            mutex_key: core::mem::zeroed(),

For global lock class keys, this is fine, but this constructor seems to
be for the non-global case. In that case, lockdep_register_key() must be
called.

Is a ww_class ever created as a non-global? I don't really think so. If
not, then let's not support it.

Alice

  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-12-03 13:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-12-01 10:28 [PATCH v8 0/6] rust: add ww_mutex support Onur Özkan
2025-12-01 10:28 ` [PATCH v8 1/6] rust: add C wrappers for ww_mutex inline functions Onur Özkan
2025-12-02 17:38   ` Daniel Almeida
2025-12-01 10:28 ` [PATCH v8 2/6] ww_mutex: add `ww_class` field unconditionally Onur Özkan
2025-12-02 17:42   ` Daniel Almeida
2025-12-01 10:28 ` [PATCH v8 3/6] rust: error: add EDEADLK Onur Özkan
2025-12-02 17:43   ` Daniel Almeida
2025-12-01 10:28 ` [PATCH v8 4/6] rust: implement Class for ww_class support Onur Özkan
2025-12-02 17:59   ` Daniel Almeida
2025-12-03 13:10   ` Alice Ryhl [this message]
2025-12-03 16:06     ` Onur Özkan
2025-12-01 10:28 ` [PATCH v8 5/6] rust: ww_mutex: add Mutex, AcquireCtx and MutexGuard Onur Özkan
2025-12-02  1:49   ` kernel test robot
2025-12-02 10:20     ` Onur Özkan
2025-12-02 18:29   ` Daniel Almeida
2025-12-03 15:49     ` Onur Özkan
2025-12-03 13:26   ` Alice Ryhl
2025-12-03 16:02     ` Onur Özkan
2025-12-04  9:08       ` Alice Ryhl
2025-12-03 17:23     ` Daniel Almeida
2025-12-04  9:07       ` Alice Ryhl
2025-12-04 13:26         ` Daniel Almeida
2025-12-04 13:33           ` Alice Ryhl
2025-12-01 10:28 ` [PATCH v8 6/6] rust: ww_mutex: implement LockSet Onur Özkan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aTA21F_fXA-xS34P@google.com \
    --to=aliceryhl@google.com \
    --cc=a.hindborg@kernel.org \
    --cc=alex.gaynor@gmail.com \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=dakr@kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel.almeida@collabora.com \
    --cc=daniel@sedlak.dev \
    --cc=felipe_life@live.com \
    --cc=gary@garyguo.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=longman@redhat.com \
    --cc=lossin@kernel.org \
    --cc=lyude@redhat.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=ojeda@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=tmgross@umich.edu \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=work@onurozkan.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).