From: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
To: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net>
Cc: rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
rcu@vger.kernel.org, "Miguel Ojeda" <ojeda@kernel.org>,
"Björn Roy Baron" <bjorn3_gh@protonmail.com>,
"Benno Lossin" <lossin@kernel.org>,
"Andreas Hindborg" <a.hindborg@kernel.org>,
"Alice Ryhl" <aliceryhl@google.com>,
"Trevor Gross" <tmgross@umich.edu>,
"Danilo Krummrich" <dakr@kernel.org>,
"Will Deacon" <will@kernel.org>,
"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>,
"Mark Rutland" <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
"Frederic Weisbecker" <frederic@kernel.org>,
"Neeraj Upadhyay" <neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org>,
"Joel Fernandes" <joelagnelf@nvidia.com>,
"Josh Triplett" <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
"Uladzislau Rezki" <urezki@gmail.com>,
"Steven Rostedt" <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
"Mathieu Desnoyers" <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
"Lai Jiangshan" <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
Zqiang <qiang.zhang@linux.dev>,
"FUJITA Tomonori" <fujita.tomonori@gmail.com>,
"Dirk Behme" <dirk.behme@de.bosch.com>,
"Dirk Behme" <dirk.behme@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] rust: sync: atomic: Clarify the need of CONFIG_ARCH_SUPPORTS_ATOMIC_RMW
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2026 05:03:48 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aW_ttGVK11On-SIW@tardis-2.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DFTKOAJE7DSB.1QJWJVC4FJY0O@garyguo.net>
On Tue, Jan 20, 2026 at 04:54:51PM +0000, Gary Guo wrote:
> On Tue Jan 20, 2026 at 2:05 PM GMT, Boqun Feng wrote:
> > Currently, since all the architectures that support Rust all have
> > CONFIG_ARCH_SUPPORTS_ATOMIC_RMW selected, the helpers of atomic
> > load/store on i8 and i16 relies on CONFIG_ARCH_SUPPORTS_ATOMIC_RMW=y.
> > It's generally fine since most of architectures support that.
> >
> > The plan for CONFIG_ARCH_SUPPORTS_ATOMIC_RMW=n architectures is adding
> > their (probably lock-based) atomic load/store for i8 and i16 as their
> > atomic_{read,set}() and atomic64_{read,set}() counterpart when they
> > plans to support Rust.
> >
> > Hence use a statis_assert!() to check this and remind the future us the
> > need of the helpers. This is more clear than the #[cfg] on impl blocks
> > of i8 and i16.
> >
> > Suggested-by: Dirk Behme <dirk.behme@gmail.com>
> > Suggested-by: Benno Lossin <lossin@kernel.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net>
>
Thanks!
> > ---
> > rust/kernel/sync/atomic/internal.rs | 19 +++++++++++++------
> > 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/rust/kernel/sync/atomic/internal.rs b/rust/kernel/sync/atomic/internal.rs
> > index 0dac58bca2b3..ef516bcb02ee 100644
> > --- a/rust/kernel/sync/atomic/internal.rs
> > +++ b/rust/kernel/sync/atomic/internal.rs
> > @@ -37,16 +37,23 @@ pub trait AtomicImpl: Sized + Send + Copy + private::Sealed {
> > type Delta;
> > }
> >
> > -// The current helpers of load/store uses `{WRITE,READ}_ONCE()` hence the atomicity is only
> > -// guaranteed against read-modify-write operations if the architecture supports native atomic RmW.
> > -#[cfg(CONFIG_ARCH_SUPPORTS_ATOMIC_RMW)]
> > +// The current helpers of load/store of atomic `i8` and `i16` use `{WRITE,READ}_ONCE()` hence the
> > +// atomicity is only guaranteed against read-modify-write operations if the architecture supports
> > +// native atomic RmW.
> > +//
> > +// In the future when a CONFIG_ARCH_SUPPORTS_ATOMIC_RMW=n architecture plans to support Rust, the
> > +// load/store helpers that guarantee atomicity against RmW operations (usually via a lock) need to
> > +// be added.
> > +crate::static_assert!(
> > + cfg!(CONFIG_ARCH_SUPPORTS_ATOMIC_RMW),
> > + "The current implementation of atomic i8/i16/ptr relies on the architecure being \
> > + ARCH_SUPPORTS_ATOMIC_RMW"
>
> The printed string when assertion fails will have 5 spaces between "being" and
> "ARCH", although it probably doesn't matter..
>
Are you sure? My test result shows:
ERROR:root:error[E0080]: evaluation panicked: The current implementation of atomic i8/i16/ptr relies on the architecure being ARCH_SUPPORTS_ATOMIC_RMW
similar is the following playground example:
https://play.rust-lang.org/?version=stable&mode=debug&edition=2024&gist=5dd0098247503be792bc35cda8f2630f
Regards,
Boqun
> Best,
> Gary
>
> > +);
> > +
> > impl AtomicImpl for i8 {
> > type Delta = Self;
> > }
> >
> > -// The current helpers of load/store uses `{WRITE,READ}_ONCE()` hence the atomicity is only
> > -// guaranteed against read-modify-write operations if the architecture supports native atomic RmW.
> > -#[cfg(CONFIG_ARCH_SUPPORTS_ATOMIC_RMW)]
> > impl AtomicImpl for i16 {
> > type Delta = Self;
> > }
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-20 22:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-20 14:05 [PATCH v2 0/2] rust: sync: Atomic pointer Boqun Feng
2026-01-20 14:05 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] rust: sync: atomic: Clarify the need of CONFIG_ARCH_SUPPORTS_ATOMIC_RMW Boqun Feng
2026-01-20 16:54 ` Gary Guo
2026-01-20 21:03 ` Boqun Feng [this message]
2026-01-20 22:45 ` Gary Guo
2026-01-20 14:05 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] rust: sync: atomic: Add Atomic<*{mut,const} T> support Boqun Feng
2026-01-23 5:54 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] rust: sync: Atomic pointer Boqun Feng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aW_ttGVK11On-SIW@tardis-2.local \
--to=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=a.hindborg@kernel.org \
--cc=aliceryhl@google.com \
--cc=bjorn3_gh@protonmail.com \
--cc=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=dirk.behme@de.bosch.com \
--cc=dirk.behme@gmail.com \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=fujita.tomonori@gmail.com \
--cc=gary@garyguo.net \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=joelagnelf@nvidia.com \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lossin@kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org \
--cc=ojeda@kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=qiang.zhang@linux.dev \
--cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tmgross@umich.edu \
--cc=urezki@gmail.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox