public inbox for rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Shashank Balaji <shashank.mahadasyam@sony.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: "Kay Sievers" <kay.sievers@vrfy.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	"Danilo Krummrich" <dakr@kernel.org>,
	"Suzuki K Poulose" <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	"Mike Leach" <mike.leach@linaro.org>,
	"James Clark" <james.clark@linaro.org>,
	"Alexander Shishkin" <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	"Maxime Coquelin" <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>,
	"Alexandre Torgue" <alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com>,
	"Miguel Ojeda" <ojeda@kernel.org>,
	"Boqun Feng" <boqun@kernel.org>, "Gary Guo" <gary@garyguo.net>,
	"Björn Roy Baron" <bjorn3_gh@protonmail.com>,
	"Benno Lossin" <lossin@kernel.org>,
	"Andreas Hindborg" <a.hindborg@kernel.org>,
	"Alice Ryhl" <aliceryhl@google.com>,
	"Trevor Gross" <tmgross@umich.edu>,
	"Richard Cochran" <richardcochran@gmail.com>,
	"Jonathan Corbet" <corbet@lwn.net>,
	"Shuah Khan" <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"Rahul Bukte" <rahul.bukte@sony.com>,
	"Daniel Palmer" <daniel.palmer@sony.com>,
	"Tim Bird" <tim.bird@sony.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, driver-core@lists.linux.dev,
	coresight@lists.linaro.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] kernel: param: handle NULL module_kset in lookup_or_create_module_kobject()
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2026 23:59:51 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aeeQ5x1uMKT6cyxp@JPC00244420> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2026042126-majesty-skyline-b76f@gregkh>

Hi Greg,

Thanks for the quick feedback!

On Tue, Apr 21, 2026 at 08:27:10AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2026 at 03:02:34PM +0900, Shashank Balaji wrote:
> > module_kset is initialized in a subsys_initcall. If a built-in driver tries to
> > register before subsys_initcall with its struct device_driver's mod_name set,
> > then a null module_kset is dereferenced via this call trace:
> > 
> >      [    0.095865] Call trace:
> >      [    0.095999]  _raw_spin_lock+0x4c/0x6c (P)
> >      [    0.096150]  kset_find_obj+0x24/0x104
> >      [    0.096209]  lookup_or_create_module_kobject+0x2c/0xd8
> >      [    0.096274]  module_add_driver+0xd4/0x138
> >      [    0.096328]  bus_add_driver+0x16c/0x268
> >      [    0.096380]  driver_register+0x68/0x100
> >      [    0.096428]  __platform_driver_register+0x24/0x30
> >      [    0.096486]  tegra194_cbb_init+0x24/0x30
> >      [    0.096540]  do_one_initcall+0xdc/0x250
> >      [    0.096608]  do_initcall_level+0x9c/0xd0
> >      [    0.096660]  do_initcalls+0x54/0x94
> >      [    0.096706]  do_basic_setup+0x20/0x2c
> >      [    0.096753]  kernel_init_freeable+0xc8/0x154
> >      [    0.096807]  kernel_init+0x20/0x1a0
> >      [    0.096851]  ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
> > 
> > So, return null in lookup_or_create_module_kobject() if module_kset is null.
> > Existing callers handle null already.
> > 
> > Fixes: f30c53a873d0 ("MODULES: add the module name for built in kernel drivers")
> 
> This isn't a bugfix.

I'll drop it in the next version.

> > Co-developed-by: Rahul Bukte <rahul.bukte@sony.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Rahul Bukte <rahul.bukte@sony.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Shashank Balaji <shashank.mahadasyam@sony.com>
> > ---
> > This bug is triggered by the next patch on arm64 defconfig: tegra194-cbb tries
> > to register from a pure_initcall, and with the next patch adding mod_name, this
> > null deref is hit.
> 
> So this isn't a bug, it's a "don't do that" type of thing :)
> 
> > ---
> >  kernel/params.c | 3 +++
> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/kernel/params.c b/kernel/params.c
> > index 74d620bc2521..881c7328c059 100644
> > --- a/kernel/params.c
> > +++ b/kernel/params.c
> > @@ -752,6 +752,9 @@ lookup_or_create_module_kobject(const char *name)
> >  	struct kobject *kobj;
> >  	int err;
> >  
> > +	if (!module_kset)
> > +		return NULL;
> 
> Are you sure that making this change is going to be ok?
> mod_sysfs_init() should have been called first as the module has to be
> created before it can be looked up.
> 
> As you are wanting "built in" drivers to show up here, you are going to
> beat the call to param_sysfs_init(), so don't do that.  Make sure that
> the drivers are NOT called before then.

The reason lookup_or_create_module_kobject() can be reached with module_kset == NULL
is that some platform drivers register before subsys_initcall: tegra194_cbb and
tegra234_cbb at pure_initcall, plus roughly 375 others at core_initcall/arch_initcall
(208 arch, 154 core, plus 2 pure and 13 _sync variants). These are dominated by
pinctrl, clk, interconnect, gpio, and mailbox drivers across six SoC vendor trees
(Qualcomm, MediaTek, Freescale, Samsung, Tegra, HiSilicon).

Given that, three ways forward:

  1. Move module_kset creation out of param_sysfs_init() (currently
     subsys_initcall) and call it directly from do_basic_setup()
     before do_initcalls(). This is the cleanest fix from a
     correctness angle: every initcall level sees a live
     module_kset. But it touches init/main.c and kernel/params.c,
     crosses two subsystem trees. I haven't fully audited
     dependencies at do_basic_setup() time.

  2. Demote the ~377 early-initcall platform drivers to
     subsys_initcall or later. Impractical at scale given coordination
     across six vendor trees, and many of these levels seem to be
     architecturally required.

  3. (This patch) Guard lookup_or_create_module_kobject() against
     NULL module_kset. Drivers registered before subsys_initcall
     don't get the /sys/.../module symlink, but they don't get it
     today either (drv->mod_name is NULL pre-patch, so the
     else-if (drv->mod_name) branch in module_add_driver() isn't
     taken). Verified on arm64: /sys/module/tegra194_cbb/ does not
     exist on a booted defconfig with or without my series. The
     guard preserves that exact state while letting the
     device_initcall majority get their symlinks as designed.

I went with option 3 because it preserves observable behaviour
everywhere and keeps the series scoped to driver-core. If you'd
rather I do option 1 instead, I'm happy to.

Thanks,
Shashank

  reply	other threads:[~2026-04-21 15:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-04-21  6:02 [PATCH v2 0/2] Enable sysfs module symlink for more built-in drivers Shashank Balaji
2026-04-21  6:02 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] kernel: param: handle NULL module_kset in lookup_or_create_module_kobject() Shashank Balaji
2026-04-21  6:27   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2026-04-21 14:59     ` Shashank Balaji [this message]
2026-04-21 15:20       ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2026-04-21  6:02 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] driver core: platform: set mod_name in driver registration Shashank Balaji
2026-04-21  6:24   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2026-04-22  9:49 ` [PATCH v3 0/4] Enable sysfs module symlink for more built-in drivers Shashank Balaji
2026-04-22  9:49   ` [PATCH v3 1/4] kernel: param: initialize module_kset on-demand Shashank Balaji
2026-04-22  9:49   ` [PATCH v3 2/4] coresight: pass THIS_MODULE implicitly through a macro Shashank Balaji
2026-04-22  9:49   ` [PATCH v3 3/4] driver core: platform: set mod_name in driver registration Shashank Balaji
2026-04-22  9:49   ` [PATCH v3 4/4] docs: driver-api: add mod_name argument to __platform_register_drivers() Shashank Balaji
2026-04-22 11:27     ` Greg Kroah-Hartman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aeeQ5x1uMKT6cyxp@JPC00244420 \
    --to=shashank.mahadasyam@sony.com \
    --cc=a.hindborg@kernel.org \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com \
    --cc=aliceryhl@google.com \
    --cc=bjorn3_gh@protonmail.com \
    --cc=boqun@kernel.org \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=coresight@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=dakr@kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel.palmer@sony.com \
    --cc=driver-core@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=gary@garyguo.net \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=james.clark@linaro.org \
    --cc=kay.sievers@vrfy.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lossin@kernel.org \
    --cc=mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com \
    --cc=mike.leach@linaro.org \
    --cc=ojeda@kernel.org \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=rahul.bukte@sony.com \
    --cc=richardcochran@gmail.com \
    --cc=rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=tim.bird@sony.com \
    --cc=tmgross@umich.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox