From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-40133.protonmail.ch (mail-40133.protonmail.ch [185.70.40.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9B6D364A for ; Tue, 6 Aug 2024 08:51:34 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.70.40.133 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1722934296; cv=none; b=I1dHBJocuHxeSngzEwpAWKAwD2Pyz+xq7vnaVh4m5kcCY01R3Bf82c/o7H/CMJ7yUJm2qNRLguDGjUGTIeetey3socVbM80hpCDixW7+f5l4PLMh5/BSCDoU9IizC3ct6ypVz277RtTXw99dOFOLmsOtOFVh3Oro6E0sxiKwCCw= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1722934296; c=relaxed/simple; bh=cY6OkhPHtRz9xJlrr0Wk6/Mc37QiDA311dyNNdaGZWw=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=NPnQ2Ji9R019EuJ7KEG9vf5Fa+dc1nLLv3s7ReGBgeEE+yoZRaMrc33oVW48e0HDlbWJrjZZ9QZp6DtPcIskvYZslv/p/i7rS/a6xKeeXxqE7D3EFa/+j7iKFFO6tcW9dSG0A7xUzPe7nkO+t+xGygVmfwuxsQUYwa+9EH21NAc= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=proton.me; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=proton.me; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=proton.me header.i=@proton.me header.b=kpmE/bSY; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.70.40.133 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=proton.me Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=proton.me Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=proton.me header.i=@proton.me header.b="kpmE/bSY" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=proton.me; s=protonmail; t=1722934292; x=1723193492; bh=cY6OkhPHtRz9xJlrr0Wk6/Mc37QiDA311dyNNdaGZWw=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: Feedback-ID:From:To:Cc:Date:Subject:Reply-To:Feedback-ID: Message-ID:BIMI-Selector; b=kpmE/bSYoVk1y2RaJkOqP0KesYwT5nPkyLy8+M0jQvITAh7buX5AZQO1GprP4bDLq nTFJ6nF3OWOpWWT3d43yA3zb4K+32dCK3P0o5tGMkX6cmhmgiXBuOEEpuGCBebcf6d gNlRMh0QVyJzYVpPRhotIVhe87BCO0X26ER639EvwIQlM8mxRd0KDmpx2n2DI58Y6f LHPHSpQxGv0Zpp6hNj7bcvkI1/lhl4XxtV6obLnzy0dAe7OwrGRIJ5Cuf12hTiR51o InXSSaF9MIKqdMbqaqoAj1JItWzeV3u4KKhhpsVyLNzGjmCTo1TAnwAdrW8cBRj7Su ttyZuHaPdul+Q== Date: Tue, 06 Aug 2024 08:51:27 +0000 To: Alice Ryhl From: Benno Lossin Cc: Matt Gilbride , Miguel Ojeda , Alex Gaynor , Wedson Almeida Filho , Boqun Feng , Gary Guo , =?utf-8?Q?Bj=C3=B6rn_Roy_Baron?= , Andreas Hindborg , Greg Kroah-Hartman , =?utf-8?Q?Arve_Hj=C3=B8nnev=C3=A5g?= , Todd Kjos , Martijn Coenen , Joel Fernandes , Carlos Llamas , Suren Baghdasaryan , Christian Brauner , Rob Landley , Davidlohr Bueso , Michel Lespinasse , rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 2/6] rust: rbtree: add red-black tree implementation backed by the C version Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: <20240727-b4-rbtree-v8-0-951600ada434@google.com> <20240727-b4-rbtree-v8-2-951600ada434@google.com> <242d0107-8e2b-4856-8f4c-1d5351fdaad8@proton.me> Feedback-ID: 71780778:user:proton X-Pm-Message-ID: 8c4ff7885984f2caa92e83d84d71dd7d0d6b35b1 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 06.08.24 10:41, Alice Ryhl wrote: > On Mon, Aug 5, 2024 at 9:02=E2=80=AFPM Benno Lossin wrote: >> Otherwise the patch looks good. >=20 > Will you give a Reviewed-by conditional on the above changes? Yes. --- Cheers, Benno