From: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me>
To: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com>, mu001999 <mu001999@outlook.com>
Cc: ojeda@kernel.org, boqun.feng@gmail.com,
rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rust: kernel: make impl_has_work compatible with more complex generics
Date: Mon, 27 May 2024 09:05:38 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d11857f1-bd9f-4cc5-ab33-44d021315796@proton.me> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAH5fLgiL7EdnzRL79x4zX0pXrtb8OjVkRib+qkoi=TyzHzEc4A@mail.gmail.com>
On 22.05.24 14:37, Alice Ryhl wrote:
> On Wed, May 22, 2024 at 2:27 PM mu001999 <mu001999@outlook.com> wrote:
>> impl_has_work! {
>> - impl<T> HasWork<Self> for ClosureWork<T> { self.work }
>> + impl{T} HasWork<Self> for ClosureWork<T> { self.work }
>> }
>
> I ended up doing something similar for the generics in some of the
> linked list patches. Does anyone know if it's possible to support this
> without giving up the <T> syntax?
I tried to come up with something some time ago, but it was not really
nice. You have to parse the entire generics manually, which ends up
looking horrible. I have been thinking some time now that a `generics`
fragment would actually be really useful in declarative macros.
I also thought that if we get even more `Has*` traits for intrusive
datastructures, we could add a unified derive macro that allows you to
just do:
#[derive(Intrusive)]
struct MyStruct {
#[intrusive]
work: Work<Self>,
#[intrusive]
timer: Timer<Self>,
/* ... */
}
But I thought that as long as we have only two intrusive structures, we
don't need this.
---
Cheers,
Benno
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-27 9:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-22 12:27 [PATCH] rust: kernel: make impl_has_work compatible with more complex generics mu001999
2024-05-22 12:37 ` Alice Ryhl
2024-05-22 13:24 ` 回复: " Xu Roland
2024-05-27 9:05 ` Benno Lossin [this message]
2024-05-22 12:38 ` Miguel Ojeda
2024-05-22 13:24 ` 回复: " Xu Roland
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-05-22 12:48 mu001999
2024-05-22 13:16 Roland Xu
2024-05-22 14:47 ` Greg KH
2024-05-22 15:55 ` Roland Xu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d11857f1-bd9f-4cc5-ab33-44d021315796@proton.me \
--to=benno.lossin@proton.me \
--cc=aliceryhl@google.com \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mu001999@outlook.com \
--cc=ojeda@kernel.org \
--cc=rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).