From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1F5E140DFCF for ; Sun, 26 Apr 2026 20:47:49 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1777236470; cv=none; b=dECzae+yAehhOTrQFc+yc5GqGyvabRsExVHV7KfQmhaIuUmKVUiXVYk3FKVcyh3SNVv3M9RejRMRIfKflZ513R1sQ4I5r4iXYMvBAgOMv15bpf71GmdFhDUy+42gG0/L+4s9BuuK5rhL8/P5ZKPkwaNvx8Bp/gXVfWfLRn3g3Yc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1777236470; c=relaxed/simple; bh=iUIKMa037K2qC8a/0h8IANYcHVtLZXNcf5RIUCxM3aE=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=q2uBcPOZtGeHcbCd9tGidlPnSbPrAkxNVhd4lxM2aBwPhnJ3u7umWWg4lUwzeERIBYMYONj8swofHWwXaTT3ogBrZNzIMDXUHA4j0ABC0FgRY/p3egLxcnU9gNmJ8UIhtbEfd5sU3+AIhhsB84SZxHutmE78Gn7CrVuJYGV4eu0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=ZMx8kNtI; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="ZMx8kNtI" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9582FC2BCAF; Sun, 26 Apr 2026 20:47:49 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1777236469; bh=iUIKMa037K2qC8a/0h8IANYcHVtLZXNcf5RIUCxM3aE=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=ZMx8kNtIM4+p0XsgnFYy18erwP1ckJpXWXXTfb+cITWmVMfCL5ZooMuzqKTR9SeUs yDQBUY4PdSdaNxPvuqdRc7/syQ076dZ4LBIe4XXtPchulcGHYbVuOBmO3fQrv40hVW rhAbHBo209sNSzwXup2bUoudMTz+DruKktEHfQZwxoGMv7yvKwn0Y8eeG3mtPreRxX 34gXmKsy7sOTJYeCIOIqyuNOS3+xJubBUQGDCHcYruoUNPSjawgZ7c+W2R6Er1EyC5 d4SHcsgoH7xkBe8y3aIk8qBtkmtkZi/gUHI5/3V6HviALdE2fpZNohCXeqX8sEZY7A /IYYJ1+YTCtuQ== From: SeongJae Park To: Andrew Morton Cc: SeongJae Park , Roman Gushchin , sashiko@lists.linux.dev Subject: Could we command Sashiko for "Failed to apply"? (was "Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/7] Implement a new generic pagewalk API") Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2026 13:47:45 -0700 Message-ID: <20260426204746.93567-1-sj@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.47.3 In-Reply-To: <20260426061148.944a69c2cb020b0d51f13f6a@linux-foundation.org> References: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: sashiko@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit + sashiko@lists.linux.dev - lists and people who might not interested in Sashiko discussion On Sun, 26 Apr 2026 06:11:48 -0700 Andrew Morton wrote: > On Sun, 26 Apr 2026 14:57:12 +0200 Oscar Salvador wrote: > > > Also, I would like to thank Vlastimil, who helped me running this > > patchset quite a few times through Claude, to catch some fixes. > > Well dang, I wanted to do a Claude-vs-Sashiko cage match, but "Failed > to apply". Again :( > (https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260426125719.24698-1-osalvador@suse.de). I also got [1] a "Failed to apply" yesterday. For that, I was asking a way to make this better for only DAMON patches. But seems DAMON is not a single user who getting this problem. I'm wondering if we could have some kind of magic words for Sashiko, like the syzbot has. That is, replying to a patch with a magic words and the baseline info like below makes Sashiko tries applying patches again with the given baseline. E.g., #sashiko-retry-baseline git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sj/linux.git 0123456789ab Never an urgent request, but just a brainstorming attempt. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/20260425221630.81644-1-sj@kernel.org Thanks, SJ [...]