From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from out-184.mta0.migadu.com (out-184.mta0.migadu.com [91.218.175.184]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 562253ADB97 for ; Wed, 13 May 2026 21:16:20 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=91.218.175.184 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1778706984; cv=none; b=K+xtz27q+fgVwEVNHLZSoc0wcfFUSMUelJ14ES6CkNmLQwZUv3a+QDU9wTcfbeOwN8yghVwJ7qHmU5LQWe58THD4QbZnTVd3JV0X7YbFCUt8Bvrhc9i5e93XnmfcAOXYecXv3tmfjFYzvJ/cVWozD814lkpHyaJ1RReZQk/j5BQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1778706984; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ljEvff4Fj1HIyQomzecLNqIOeHT59iTeI4l3OgOpLmU=; h=Content-Type:Mime-Version:Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc: Message-Id:References:To; b=RpeKFgpiNecMBXxxJmjko5h2bN6hf9aaV35uW2XRyiels4WrXN7Heq+At9QJFf8aIrX1realtWOsT213eZNlvuJdyOEo1Dcb5W4VMBF7iBmZaVtQkmonmgTXkSek3W+SHCF2LpBG+x0NjkB+U/ny4zZ1U5CnvdwdoGZNDMHmtRg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b=rR6Ksu0y; arc=none smtp.client-ip=91.218.175.184 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b="rR6Ksu0y" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.dev; s=key1; t=1778706977; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=ljEvff4Fj1HIyQomzecLNqIOeHT59iTeI4l3OgOpLmU=; b=rR6Ksu0y7Me2DJZgk59VC4pSKuqNsuyXGQ0FoeboownQqT1pcCuxJHvtN1lUPa8eXST03N HN2O0MaYBvWCcy6hrWbIqdSY8LrFVJJzwb87CVootqiY/LLsfo7KBYgCO7thSoJgAStU8v cAsz8RzrHhsdMxNdWGQR1BOSlMni+9I= Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: sashiko@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Subject: Re: Sashiko.dev webview not getting updated X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. From: Roman Gushchin In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 13 May 2026 14:16:02 -0700 Cc: sashiko@lists.linux.dev Message-Id: <573D9952-FD22-46FC-A48A-071CC2ECCBCD@linux.dev> References: To: Lasse Charlemagne X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT Yeah, I know and I=E2=80=99m working on it. Should be better now, Sashiko is= actively clearing the accumulated backlog. Thanks! > On May 13, 2026, at 1:36=E2=80=AFAM, Charlemagne Lasse wrote: >=20 > =EF=BB=BFAm Di., 12. Mai 2026 um 17:56 Uhr schrieb Charlemagne Lasse > : >>=20 >>> Thank you for the report. It's a known issue, actually caused by some >>> issues with the LLM provider, nothing sashiko-specific. We're working on= >>> fixing it. >=20 > Does it make sense to inform you about this or are you automatically > informed about this state? Because the whole system (LLM provider, > ...) is again in this state and no new patches are shown on > sashiko.dev since 3 hours ago. >=20