Sashiko discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jiri Olsa <olsajiri@gmail.com>
To: sashiko@lists.linux.dev
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv5 bpf-next 13/28] bpf: Add support for tracing multi link
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2026 10:56:34 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aec7woEWsDxnDvqv@krava> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260418085839.ADC19C19424@smtp.kernel.org>

On Sat, Apr 18, 2026 at 08:58:39AM +0000, sashiko-bot@kernel.org wrote:
> Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s):
> - [Low] The patch references several undeclared identifiers and incomplete types, causing compilation failures.
> --
> 
> commit fc7697083b71bebef41d2da3a91ca2a0741ad6f0
> Author: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
> 
> bpf: Add support for tracing multi link
> 
> Adding a new link to allow attaching a BPF program to multiple function
> BTF IDs, represented by struct bpf_tracing_multi_link.
> 
> > diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
> > index a3c0214ca9341..da3e01dd7ee9a 100644
> > --- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
> > +++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
> [ ... ]
> > @@ -5748,6 +5748,8 @@ static int link_create(union bpf_attr *attr, bpfptr_t uattr)
> >  			ret = bpf_iter_link_attach(attr, uattr, prog);
> >  		else if (prog->expected_attach_type == BPF_LSM_CGROUP)
> >  			ret = cgroup_bpf_link_attach(attr, prog);
> > +		else if (is_tracing_multi(prog->expected_attach_type))
> > +			ret = bpf_tracing_multi_attach(prog, attr);
> 
> Is is_tracing_multi() defined anywhere? It doesn't appear to be declared
> in this patch or the existing kernel tree, which could lead to a build
> failure.

it's added in "bpf: Add multi tracing attach types"

> 
> > diff --git a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
> > index af7079aa0f36d..df06a733a2e71 100644
> > --- a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
> > +++ b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
> [ ... ]
> > +static void bpf_tracing_multi_link_release(struct bpf_link *link)
> > +{
> > +	struct bpf_tracing_multi_link *tr_link =
> > +		container_of(link, struct bpf_tracing_multi_link, link);
> > +
> > +	WARN_ON_ONCE(bpf_trampoline_multi_detach(link->prog, tr_link));
> > +}
> 
> Where is struct bpf_tracing_multi_link defined? It seems to be an
> incomplete type here. 
> 
> Similarly, bpf_trampoline_multi_detach() doesn't appear to be declared in
> this patch. Will this cause compilation errors when dereferencing or
> calling these?

defined in previous patch "bpf: Add bpf_trampoline_multi_attach/detach functions"

> 
> [ ... ]
> > +	err = bpf_link_prime(&link->link, &link_primer);
> > +	if (err)
> > +		goto error;
> > +
> > +	link->nodes_cnt = cnt;
> > +
> > +	err = bpf_trampoline_multi_attach(prog, ids, link);
> 
> Does bpf_trampoline_multi_attach() also miss a declaration?

defined in previous patch "bpf: Add bpf_trampoline_multi_attach/detach functions"

what do I miss? ;-)

jirka

           reply	other threads:[~2026-04-21  8:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed
 [parent not found: <20260418085839.ADC19C19424@smtp.kernel.org>]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aec7woEWsDxnDvqv@krava \
    --to=olsajiri@gmail.com \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox