Sashiko discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
To: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
	sashiko@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 9/9] perf debuginfo: Fix libdw API contract violations
Date: Mon, 4 May 2026 14:54:27 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <afjdU9yZ5WYNgyc5@x1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAP-5=fUuqcGCgpZApHbqpP8hxs2Y+FYU2W=h1T0D4qgdhOfdBw@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, May 04, 2026 at 08:26:34AM -0700, Ian Rogers wrote:
> On Mon, May 4, 2026 at 3:53 AM <sashiko-bot@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
> > - [Critical] This problem wasn't introduced by this patch, but the open() call in debuginfo__init_offline_dwarf() lacks the O_NONBLOCK flag, exposing a local Denial of Service (DoS) vulnerability.
> > --
> >
> > commit a6e339ae66465b909762a437f958cdaed424b666
> > Author: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
> >
> > perf debuginfo: Fix libdw API contract violations
> >
> > This commit adds return value checks for dwfl_report_end and
> > dwfl_module_relocation_info to prevent potential segmentation faults. It also
> > fixes a file descriptor leak in the error path of
> > debuginfo__init_offline_dwarf() when offline initialization fails.
> >
> > > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/debuginfo.c b/tools/perf/util/debuginfo.c
> > > index 0e35c13abd04..84a78b30ceac 100644
> > > --- a/tools/perf/util/debuginfo.c
> > > +++ b/tools/perf/util/debuginfo.c
> > > @@ -42,6 +42,7 @@ static int debuginfo__init_offline_dwarf(struct debuginfo *dbg,
> > >  {
> > >       GElf_Addr dummy;
> > >       int fd;
> > > +     bool fd_consumed = false;
> > >
> > >       fd = open(path, O_RDONLY);
> >
> > While this wasn't introduced by this patch, could this open() call cause a
> > regression by hanging on a FIFO?
> >
> > If the path originates from user-controlled sources, opening it without
> > O_NONBLOCK can cause the perf record session to hang indefinitely. Using
> > O_RDONLY | O_NONBLOCK would prevent this.
> 
> So this review is bad and based on this prompt:
> https://github.com/masoncl/review-prompts/blob/main/kernel/subsystem/perf.md#file-io-safety-on-untrusted-paths
> 
> I'm trying to get the bad prompt removed. The prompt was automatically
> generated from fixes commits when we added O_NONBLOCK to address build
> ID reading hangs, particularly for data mmaps during perf record
> synthesis. We now avoid those hangs by checking for a "regular" file
> with stat. Therefore, the advice regarding O_NONBLOCK and EINTR from
> the prompts is incorrect and does not reflect what the code base does.
> 
> Side note: this is the only Sashiko feedback on this series:
> https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260504081227.2203848-1-irogers%40google.com

I'll process it soon,

- Arnaldo

      reply	other threads:[~2026-05-04 17:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20260504081227.2203848-10-irogers@google.com>
     [not found] ` <20260504105301.29676C2BCB8@smtp.kernel.org>
2026-05-04 15:26   ` [PATCH v5 9/9] perf debuginfo: Fix libdw API contract violations Ian Rogers
2026-05-04 17:54     ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=afjdU9yZ5WYNgyc5@x1 \
    --to=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=irogers@google.com \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox