From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 957F23769FF; Fri, 3 Jul 2026 08:02:20 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1783065741; cv=none; b=IVlAUhaoYY8HRvithd8OinBtnpAiTAyLxs1XMcABXNimQk49LYzgmfzsGuunTZ0RZmGKU7Net0rx7EGWTRIfvc4HW6UpGM+YgZSrAOivwQJHnpn4P50CrVayEPkWMR0ucvYDEScOYLKt11k+CXuyrav98ByPjuBgQN6OSEk+fDM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1783065741; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Q9MHvO1Mg+fJgEmB5ToXhPQf5PaGzFnFoAHtM5PqRLs=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=PUvUA4ZoQHITzgXMjc9HLPA6S1xE0YeLPquYQLOYkas2qfdcBF7XlzqaER8jf4KI/4YZpoMwNb1eMqW77kkGqqbq3MkkeSnjwIudKbi8WPYI5o3GGfZK9G1Z6Je2SmtJKuPRDyFX6efjhhuXHcIYq8rjyZck1xrkpBI+udecYdc= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=aIFJTLCP; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="aIFJTLCP" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 48DDB1F000E9; Fri, 3 Jul 2026 08:02:20 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1783065740; bh=BPJPZtvPNmvxz8zHs3l4lLnqw91ZscDgdeY9b3+eMPA=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=aIFJTLCPiaGIAWyZIayZGNZqkN3F5S5ERK8mEYiGCL/fqOmiPo72iAV++wuX5PeSN GkEYLp4xdEDC4qX43SCBQN0UQim+YVsP982Jut0zYPon42clKL1H9r/JmWnrPNKT34 k+HlwE+Xd1X0ThrUUZ8BsTRfxsdoVA+a5GTtRpEkaw4/0k0jq9iT/b49nbvoCDf5XA deDxEf52NvG9YZ8o5fyFFKrPZ/OdmGtWVrsISL5NMF5hyCKuVxnhn+a02X/wMmGUOx KHlmk5xyAS1yqCOaxQy4YmzdleIjlyqYt88oepwM2/WOhmbZ0wajOCIYC9fTBBuRMs 0h1Qs3qccldcg== From: Tejun Heo To: David Vernet , Andrea Righi , Changwoo Min Cc: sched-ext@lists.linux.dev, Emil Tsalapatis , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Tejun Heo Subject: [PATCH sched_ext/for-7.3 20/32] sched_ext: Generalize local-DSQ handling to rq-owned DSQs Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2026 22:01:47 -1000 Message-ID: <20260703080159.2314350-21-tj@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.54.0 In-Reply-To: <20260703080159.2314350-1-tj@kernel.org> References: <20260703080159.2314350-1-tj@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: sched-ext@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit The local DSQ is synchronized by the containing rq lock rather than its own dsq->lock. A later patch adds a second such DSQ. In preparation, factor the "rq owns the lock" test into dsq_is_rq_owned() and rename local_dsq_post_enq() to rq_owned_post_enq(), taking @rq explicitly. No behavior change. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo --- kernel/sched/ext/ext.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------ 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/sched/ext/ext.c b/kernel/sched/ext/ext.c index 4f0d72658fd8..7d8846cea425 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/ext/ext.c +++ b/kernel/sched/ext/ext.c @@ -96,6 +96,17 @@ static atomic_long_t scx_hotplug_seq = ATOMIC_LONG_INIT(0); /* Global cursor for the per-CPU tid allocator. Starts at 1; tid 0 is reserved. */ static atomic64_t scx_tid_cursor = ATOMIC64_INIT(1); +/* is @dsq synchronized by the containing rq lock instead of dsq->lock? */ +static bool dsq_is_rq_owned(struct scx_dispatch_q *dsq) +{ + switch (dsq->id) { + case SCX_DSQ_LOCAL: + return true; + default: + return false; + } +} + #ifdef CONFIG_EXT_SUB_SCHED /* * The sub sched being enabled. Used by scx_disable_and_exit_task() to exit @@ -1263,11 +1274,10 @@ static void call_task_dequeue(struct scx_sched *sch, struct rq *rq, p->scx.flags &= ~SCX_TASK_IN_CUSTODY; } -static void local_dsq_post_enq(struct scx_sched *sch, struct scx_dispatch_q *dsq, - struct task_struct *p, u64 enq_flags) +static void rq_owned_post_enq(struct scx_sched *sch, struct rq *rq, + struct scx_dispatch_q *dsq, struct task_struct *p, + u64 enq_flags) { - struct rq *rq = container_of(dsq, struct rq, scx.local_dsq); - call_task_dequeue(sch, rq, p, 0); /* @@ -1327,13 +1337,13 @@ static void scx_dispatch_enqueue(struct scx_sched *sch, struct rq *rq, struct scx_dispatch_q *dsq, struct task_struct *p, u64 enq_flags) { - bool is_local = dsq->id == SCX_DSQ_LOCAL; + bool is_rq_owned = dsq_is_rq_owned(dsq); WARN_ON_ONCE(p->scx.dsq || !list_empty(&p->scx.dsq_list.node)); WARN_ON_ONCE((p->scx.dsq_flags & SCX_TASK_DSQ_ON_PRIQ) || !RB_EMPTY_NODE(&p->scx.dsq_priq)); - if (!is_local) { + if (!is_rq_owned) { raw_spin_lock_nested(&dsq->lock, (enq_flags & SCX_ENQ_NESTED) ? SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING : 0); @@ -1428,8 +1438,8 @@ static void scx_dispatch_enqueue(struct scx_sched *sch, struct rq *rq, * ops_state first, both sides would modify p->scx.flags * concurrently in a non-atomic way. */ - if (is_local) { - local_dsq_post_enq(sch, dsq, p, enq_flags); + if (is_rq_owned) { + rq_owned_post_enq(sch, rq, dsq, p, enq_flags); } else { /* * Task on global/bypass DSQ: leave custody, task on @@ -1476,7 +1486,7 @@ static void task_unlink_from_dsq(struct task_struct *p, static void scx_dispatch_dequeue(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p) { struct scx_dispatch_q *dsq = p->scx.dsq; - bool is_local = dsq == &rq->scx.local_dsq; + bool is_rq_owned = dsq && dsq_is_rq_owned(dsq); lockdep_assert_rq_held(rq); @@ -1500,7 +1510,7 @@ static void scx_dispatch_dequeue(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p) return; } - if (!is_local) + if (!is_rq_owned) raw_spin_lock(&dsq->lock); /* @@ -1522,7 +1532,7 @@ static void scx_dispatch_dequeue(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p) } p->scx.dsq = NULL; - if (!is_local) + if (!is_rq_owned) raw_spin_unlock(&dsq->lock); } @@ -2074,7 +2084,7 @@ static void move_local_task_to_local_dsq(struct scx_sched *sch, dsq_inc_nr(dst_dsq, p, enq_flags); p->scx.dsq = dst_dsq; - local_dsq_post_enq(sch, dst_dsq, p, enq_flags); + rq_owned_post_enq(sch, dst_rq, dst_dsq, p, enq_flags); } /** -- 2.54.0