From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Matt Fleming" <matt@readmodwrite.com>
Cc: tj@kernel.org, sched-ext@lists.linux.dev, mkoutny@suse.com,
hannes@cmpxchg.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched_ext: Fix deadlock with PSI trigger creation
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2026 10:17:31 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260710101732.93C481F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260710100441.2653477-1-matt@readmodwrite.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] The patch fixes an ABBA deadlock between `cgroup_mutex` and `scx_fork_rwsem` in `scx_root_enable_workfn()`, but leaves the exact same lock inversion unpatched in `scx_root_disable()`, `scx_sub_disable()`, and `scx_sub_enable_workfn()`.
--
--- Patch [1]: [PATCH] sched_ext: Fix deadlock with PSI trigger creation ---
commit aacffeaa1e10b05888e4970e698ee8d1863dbbbd
Author: Matt Fleming <mfleming@cloudflare.com>
sched_ext: Fix deadlock with PSI trigger creation
This commit fixes an ABBA deadlock between cgroup_mutex and scx_fork_rwsem
in scx_root_enable_workfn(). It prevents deadlocks that can occur when
concurrent writes to cgroup PSI trigger files attempt to create kthreads.
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/ext/ext.c b/kernel/sched/ext/ext.c
> index 691d53fe0f648..ba89eafe79643 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/ext/ext.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/ext/ext.c
> @@ -7193,7 +7193,10 @@ static void scx_root_enable_workfn(struct kthread_work *work)
> /*
> * Lock out forks, cgroup on/offlining and moves before opening the
> * floodgate so that they don't wander into the operations prematurely.
> + * cgroup_mutex must nest outside scx_fork_rwsem because cgroup file
> + * operations may create kthreads while holding cgroup_mutex.
> */
> + scx_cgroup_lock();
> percpu_down_write(&scx_fork_rwsem);
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does this same lock inversion still exist
in other scheduler functions?
For example, scx_sub_disable() takes scx_fork_rwsem before scx_cgroup_lock():
kernel/sched/ext/ext.c:scx_sub_disable() {
...
percpu_down_write(&scx_fork_rwsem);
scx_cgroup_lock();
...
}
scx_root_disable() also takes the locks in the old order:
kernel/sched/ext/ext.c:scx_root_disable() {
...
percpu_down_write(&scx_fork_rwsem);
...
scx_cgroup_lock();
...
}
And scx_sub_enable_workfn() appears to do the same:
kernel/sched/ext/ext.c:scx_sub_enable_workfn() {
...
percpu_down_write(&scx_fork_rwsem);
scx_cgroup_lock();
...
}
Could a concurrent PSI trigger write still cause a deadlock if it races
with these other paths?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260710100441.2653477-1-matt@readmodwrite.com?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-10 10:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-10 10:04 [PATCH] sched_ext: Fix deadlock with PSI trigger creation Matt Fleming
2026-07-10 10:17 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-10 17:46 ` Andrea Righi
2026-07-10 18:24 ` Andrea Righi
2026-07-10 23:49 ` [PATCH cgroup/for-7.2-fixes] cgroup: Create the psimon kthread outside of cgroup_mutex Tejun Heo
2026-07-11 0:04 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-11 5:54 ` Matt Fleming
2026-07-12 17:49 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260710101732.93C481F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=matt@readmodwrite.com \
--cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=sched-ext@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox