From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Andrea Righi" <arighi@nvidia.com>
Cc: sched-ext@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/12] sched_ext: Fix proxy-exec race in consume_remote_task()
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2026 07:51:28 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260721075129.2DB1F1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260721063242.552774-7-arighi@nvidia.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] task_can_move_from_locked_rq() fails to check if the task is the active donor on the source runqueue under proxy execution.
--
--- Patch [6]: [PATCH 06/12] sched_ext: Fix proxy-exec race in consume_remote_task() ---
commit 681e47b7800ef6cd6756031dfb833542e391c7df
Author: Andrea Righi <arighi@nvidia.com>
sched_ext: Fix proxy-exec race in consume_remote_task()
This patch addresses a proxy execution race where a task's state can change
without clearing holding_cpu. It introduces task_can_move_from_locked_rq()
to recheck the on-CPU and migration-disabled states after switching to the
source runqueue lock. If the state changed, the task is requeued on the
global DSQ instead of aborting the BPF scheduler.
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/ext/ext.c b/kernel/sched/ext/ext.c
> index 30d5965d09108..b5fd91d9bca4f 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/ext/ext.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/ext/ext.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -2432,6 +2429,28 @@ static bool task_can_run_on_remote_rq(struct scx_sched *sch,
> return true;
> }
>
> +/*
> + * Proxy execution can change @p's execution and migration-disabled state
> + * without touching its DSQ entry or clearing holding_cpu. Check those states
> + * with @p's rq locked. Without proxy execution, the holding_cpu handshake is
> + * sufficient and this must not affect the existing migration path.
> + */
> +static bool task_can_move_from_locked_rq(struct task_struct *p)
> +{
> + struct rq *src_rq = task_rq(p);
> +
> + lockdep_assert_rq_held(src_rq);
> +
> + if (!sched_proxy_exec())
> + return true;
> +
> + /* @p may be rq->curr under another task's proxy scheduling context. */
> + if (task_on_cpu(src_rq, p))
> + return false;
> +
[Severity: High]
Is it possible for the active scheduling context (the donor) to be migrated
here?
When a task blocks on a mutex and becomes a proxy donor, it is retained on
the runqueue (p->on_rq == 1) without being dequeued. put_prev_task_scx()
sees SCX_TASK_QUEUED and enqueues this blocked task onto a DSQ.
When another CPU attempts to consume from this DSQ, consume_remote_task()
invokes this new task_can_move_from_locked_rq(). Since the donor is
blocked, task_on_cpu(src_rq, p) evaluates to false.
Without a check for task_current_donor(src_rq, p), could this return true
and allow move_remote_task_to_local_dsq() to migrate the active donor,
corrupting the proxy execution PI chain?
> + return !is_migration_disabled(p);
> +}
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260721063242.552774-1-arighi@nvidia.com?part=6
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-21 7:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-21 6:31 [PATCHSET v8 sched_ext/for-7.3] sched: Make proxy execution compatible with sched_ext Andrea Righi
2026-07-21 6:31 ` [PATCH 01/12] sched/core: Avoid false migration warning for proxy donors Andrea Righi
2026-07-21 6:50 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-21 7:00 ` John Stultz
2026-07-21 7:34 ` Andrea Righi
2026-07-21 6:31 ` [PATCH 02/12] sched: Make NOHZ CFS bandwidth checks follow proxy donor Andrea Righi
2026-07-21 7:13 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-21 6:31 ` [PATCH 03/12] sched: Add helper to block retained proxy donors Andrea Righi
2026-07-21 7:02 ` John Stultz
2026-07-21 6:31 ` [PATCH 04/12] sched_ext: Block proxy donors across scheduler transitions Andrea Righi
2026-07-22 23:26 ` Tejun Heo
2026-07-23 16:47 ` Andrea Righi
2026-07-21 6:31 ` [PATCH 05/12] sched_ext: Fix ops.running/stopping() pairing for proxy-exec donors Andrea Righi
2026-07-22 23:26 ` Tejun Heo
2026-07-21 6:31 ` [PATCH 06/12] sched_ext: Fix proxy-exec race in consume_remote_task() Andrea Righi
2026-07-21 7:09 ` John Stultz
2026-07-21 7:51 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-22 23:26 ` Tejun Heo
2026-07-21 6:31 ` [PATCH 07/12] sched_ext: Split curr|donor references properly Andrea Righi
2026-07-21 8:13 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-21 6:31 ` [PATCH 08/12] sched_ext: Handle blocked donor migration with proxy execution Andrea Righi
2026-07-21 8:42 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-21 6:31 ` [PATCH 09/12] sched_ext: Delegate proxy donor admission to BPF schedulers Andrea Righi
2026-07-22 23:26 ` Tejun Heo
2026-07-21 6:31 ` [PATCH 10/12] sched_ext: Add selftest for blocked donor admission Andrea Righi
2026-07-21 6:31 ` [PATCH 11/12] sched_ext: scx_qmap: Add proxy execution support Andrea Righi
2026-07-21 6:31 ` [PATCH 12/12] sched: Allow enabling proxy exec with sched_ext Andrea Righi
2026-07-21 7:05 ` John Stultz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260721075129.2DB1F1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=arighi@nvidia.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=sched-ext@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox