Sched_ext development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Tao Cui" <cui.tao@linux.dev>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, sched-ext@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched_ext: pass the initial cpu.idle state in scx_cgroup_init_args
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2026 13:55:56 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260824135557.2CC371F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260824133954.561956-1-cui.tao@linux.dev>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] The patch fails to initialize the new `idle` field in `struct scx_cgroup_init_args` in the sub-scheduler paths, causing it to implicitly default to false and lose the correct idle state.
--

--- Patch [1]: [PATCH] sched_ext: pass the initial cpu.idle state in scx_cgroup_init_args ---
commit 6b122f2bce26c31e18660129955114867f5a36b0
Author: Tao Cui <cuitao@kylinos.cn>

sched_ext: pass the initial cpu.idle state in scx_cgroup_init_args

This commit adds the idle state to scx_cgroup_init_args and initializes it
in scx_tg_online() and scx_cgroup_init(). This ensures that cgroups already
configured as idle before the scheduler is loaded are correctly presented as
idle to the BPF scheduler.

> diff --git a/kernel/sched/ext/internal.h b/kernel/sched/ext/internal.h
> index 53e136a47924d..aa149a9c29f7b 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/ext/internal.h
> +++ b/kernel/sched/ext/internal.h
> @@ -259,6 +259,9 @@ struct scx_cgroup_init_args {
>  	u64			bw_period_us;
>  	u64			bw_quota_us;
>  	u64			bw_burst_us;
> +
> +	/* whether the cgroup is configured idle via cpu.idle */
> +	bool			idle;
>  };

[Severity: Medium]
When adding this new field, did we miss updating the struct initialization in
the sub-scheduler paths?

Looking at kernel/sched/ext/sub.c, both scx_cgroup_claim_subtree() and
scx_cgroup_return_subtree() initialize the struct but omit the new field:

kernel/sched/ext/sub.c:scx_cgroup_claim_subtree() {
    ...
		struct scx_cgroup_init_args args = {
			.weight = tg->scx.weight,
			.bw_period_us = tg->scx.bw_period_us,
			.bw_quota_us = tg->scx.bw_quota_us,
			.bw_burst_us = tg->scx.bw_burst_us,
		};
    ...
}

The exact same pattern also exists in scx_cgroup_return_subtree().

Without explicitly setting the idle field in these paths, wouldn't it
implicitly default to false, causing cgroups to incorrectly lose their idle
state when a sub-scheduler is enabled or disabled?

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260824133954.561956-1-cui.tao@linux.dev?part=1

  reply	other threads:[~2026-08-24 13:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-24 13:39 [PATCH] sched_ext: pass the initial cpu.idle state in scx_cgroup_init_args Tao Cui
2026-08-24 13:55 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-24 14:11 ` Andrea Righi
2026-08-24 14:16   ` Tao Cui

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260824135557.2CC371F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=cui.tao@linux.dev \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=sched-ext@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox