From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Tao Cui" <cui.tao@linux.dev>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, sched-ext@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched_ext: pass the initial cpu.idle state in scx_cgroup_init_args
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2026 13:55:56 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260824135557.2CC371F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260824133954.561956-1-cui.tao@linux.dev>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] The patch fails to initialize the new `idle` field in `struct scx_cgroup_init_args` in the sub-scheduler paths, causing it to implicitly default to false and lose the correct idle state.
--
--- Patch [1]: [PATCH] sched_ext: pass the initial cpu.idle state in scx_cgroup_init_args ---
commit 6b122f2bce26c31e18660129955114867f5a36b0
Author: Tao Cui <cuitao@kylinos.cn>
sched_ext: pass the initial cpu.idle state in scx_cgroup_init_args
This commit adds the idle state to scx_cgroup_init_args and initializes it
in scx_tg_online() and scx_cgroup_init(). This ensures that cgroups already
configured as idle before the scheduler is loaded are correctly presented as
idle to the BPF scheduler.
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/ext/internal.h b/kernel/sched/ext/internal.h
> index 53e136a47924d..aa149a9c29f7b 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/ext/internal.h
> +++ b/kernel/sched/ext/internal.h
> @@ -259,6 +259,9 @@ struct scx_cgroup_init_args {
> u64 bw_period_us;
> u64 bw_quota_us;
> u64 bw_burst_us;
> +
> + /* whether the cgroup is configured idle via cpu.idle */
> + bool idle;
> };
[Severity: Medium]
When adding this new field, did we miss updating the struct initialization in
the sub-scheduler paths?
Looking at kernel/sched/ext/sub.c, both scx_cgroup_claim_subtree() and
scx_cgroup_return_subtree() initialize the struct but omit the new field:
kernel/sched/ext/sub.c:scx_cgroup_claim_subtree() {
...
struct scx_cgroup_init_args args = {
.weight = tg->scx.weight,
.bw_period_us = tg->scx.bw_period_us,
.bw_quota_us = tg->scx.bw_quota_us,
.bw_burst_us = tg->scx.bw_burst_us,
};
...
}
The exact same pattern also exists in scx_cgroup_return_subtree().
Without explicitly setting the idle field in these paths, wouldn't it
implicitly default to false, causing cgroups to incorrectly lose their idle
state when a sub-scheduler is enabled or disabled?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260824133954.561956-1-cui.tao@linux.dev?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-24 13:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-24 13:39 [PATCH] sched_ext: pass the initial cpu.idle state in scx_cgroup_init_args Tao Cui
2026-08-24 13:55 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-24 14:11 ` Andrea Righi
2026-08-24 14:16 ` Tao Cui
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260824135557.2CC371F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=cui.tao@linux.dev \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=sched-ext@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox