From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Wanwu Li" <liwanwu@kylinos.cn>
Cc: sched-ext@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched_ext: Fix NULL sched deref in select_cpu_and sub-sched error path
Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2026 15:58:29 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260902155829.CDF681F00A3F@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260902153640.144791-1-liwanwu@kylinos.cn>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] The patch deliberately excludes `scx_bpf_dsq_insert_vtime()` from the fix, leaving a NULL pointer dereference and lockdep violation intact. The author incorrectly assumes that `@p is always the calling scheduler's own task in the contexts where it runs` because `SYSCALL` programs are rejected. However, `STRUCT_OPS` programs (such as `ops.enqueue` or `ops.dispatch`) are allowed to call this kfunc, and the BPF verifier only enforces the `KF_RCU` flag for `@p`. A `STRUCT_OPS` program can obtain an arbitrary task via `bpf_task_from_pid()` (e.g., an exited task or a CFS task) and legally pass it in. When a sub-scheduler is attached, the error path calls `scx_error(scx_task_sched(p), ...)`. Calling `scx_task_sched(p)` on an arbitrary task without its `pi_lock` or `rq_lock` triggers a lockdep warning, and if the task is not managed by sched_ext, it returns `NULL`. `scx_error()` then unconditionally dereferences this `NULL` pointer in `scx_vexit()`, oopsing the kernel.
--
commit ea8e652cd7b48dd94e0786bbc598c91806ffad36
Author: Wanwu Li <liwanwu@kylinos.cn>
sched_ext: Fix NULL sched deref in select_cpu_and sub-sched error path
This commit fixes a NULL pointer dereference in the error path of
scx_bpf_select_cpu_and() by using scx_task_sched_rcu(p). It deliberately
excludes scx_bpf_dsq_insert_vtime() from the fix based on the assumption
that it cannot be reached with a NULL task scheduler.
> scx_bpf_dsq_insert_vtime() has the same error path but it is not reachable
> with a NULL @p: SYSCALL programs are rejected for its kfunc set and @p is
> always the calling scheduler's own task in the contexts where it runs, so
> it is left unchanged.
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but is the assumption that @p is always the
calling scheduler's own task accurate here?
Although SYSCALL programs are rejected, struct_ops programs (such as
ops.enqueue or ops.dispatch) are allowed to call scx_bpf_dsq_insert_vtime()
in kernel/sched/ext/ext.c.
The BPF verifier only enforces the KF_RCU flag for the p argument, which
means a struct_ops program can obtain an arbitrary task via
bpf_task_from_pid() (e.g., an exited task or a task managed by CFS) and
legally pass it in.
If a sub-scheduler is attached, the error path in scx_bpf_dsq_insert_vtime()
calls scx_task_sched(p). Calling scx_task_sched(p) on an arbitrary task
without holding its pi_lock or rq_lock triggers a lockdep warning, and if the
task is not managed by sched_ext, it returns NULL.
The scx_error() function then unconditionally dereferences this NULL pointer
in scx_vexit(), oopsing the kernel.
Could scx_bpf_dsq_insert_vtime() also be updated to use the same
scx_task_sched_rcu(p) ?: sch fallback that this patch introduces?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260902153640.144791-1-liwanwu@kylinos.cn?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-02 15:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-02 15:36 [PATCH] sched_ext: Fix NULL sched deref in select_cpu_and sub-sched error path Wanwu Li
2026-09-02 15:58 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-02 16:14 ` Andrea Righi
2026-09-02 16:34 ` liwanwu
2026-09-02 17:07 ` [PATCH v2] sched_ext: Fix NULL sched deref in kfunc sub-sched error paths Wanwu Li
2026-09-02 18:11 ` Andrea Righi
2026-09-02 19:37 ` Tejun Heo
2026-09-02 19:39 ` Tejun Heo
2026-09-03 6:06 ` [PATCH v3] " Wanwu Li
2026-09-03 17:56 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260902155829.CDF681F00A3F@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=liwanwu@kylinos.cn \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=sched-ext@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox