Sched_ext development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Tao Cui" <cui.tao@linux.dev>
Cc: sched-ext@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] sched_ext: Reset cpuperf_target when a sub loses SCX_CAP_PERF or dies
Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2026 14:48:51 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261006144851.E8AA51F0089B@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261006142834.2815197-1-cui.tao@linux.dev>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] bpf: missing dying scheduler check in scx_bpf_cpuperf_set()
--

commit 44646e483943d4ebcaaab6b95abd7f0ef7f1bd41
Author: Tao Cui <cuitao@kylinos.cn>

sched_ext: Reset cpuperf_target when a sub loses SCX_CAP_PERF or dies

This commit resets the cpuperf_target of a sub-scheduler when it loses
SCX_CAP_PERF or dies. It adds a dying scheduler check to scx_bpf_cidperf_set()
to prevent late writes from polluting the state.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/sched-ext/20261004012721.615419-1-cui.tao@linux.dev/

> diff --git a/kernel/sched/ext/ext.c b/kernel/sched/ext/ext.c
> index 0917f05263a37..8b661e9bdf6bb 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/ext/ext.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/ext/ext.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -10958,6 +10960,15 @@ __bpf_kfunc s32 scx_bpf_cidperf_set(s32 cid, u32 perf,
>  	if (!scx_kf_allowed_ctx(sch))
>  		return -EDEADLK;
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * Reject writes from a dying scheduler. Its targets have been or
> +	 * will be swept back to the neutral base, but ops.exit() and any
> +	 * late stragglers still run after that sweep - a write there would
> +	 * land after the final reset with nothing left to clean it up.
> +	 */
> +	if (unlikely(atomic_read(&sch->exit_kind) != SCX_EXIT_NONE))
> +		return -EACCES;
> +

[Severity: High]
This correctly prevents a dying scheduler from repolluting targets via the
CID-addressed variant, but should the same check be applied to the
CPU-addressed variant, scx_bpf_cpuperf_set(), defined just above this
function?

Looking at scx_bpf_cpuperf_set() in kernel/sched/ext/ext.c:

    if (!scx_kf_allowed_ctx(sch))
            return;

    scx_cpuperf_set(sch, cpu, perf);

If a dying sub-scheduler executes BPF timers or tracers after the final
cpuperf sweep in scx_sub_disable() but before sch->dead is set, could it use
scx_bpf_cpuperf_set() to bypass this safety gate and repollute
rq->scx.cpuperf_target?

Since the root scheduler remains running, would schedutil permanently consume
this stale low-frequency target and pin the CPU?

>  	cpu = scx_cid_to_cpu(sch, cid);
>  	if (cpu < 0)
>  		return cpu;

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261006142834.2815197-1-cui.tao@linux.dev?part=1

  reply	other threads:[~2026-10-06 14:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-06 14:28 [PATCH v2] sched_ext: Reset cpuperf_target when a sub loses SCX_CAP_PERF or dies Tao Cui
2026-10-06 14:48 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-10-06 19:31 ` Tejun Heo
2026-10-08  4:37   ` Tao Cui

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20261006144851.E8AA51F0089B@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=cui.tao@linux.dev \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=sched-ext@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox