Sched_ext development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Cheng-Yang Chou <yphbchou0911@gmail.com>
Cc: sched-ext@lists.linux.dev, David Vernet <void@manifault.com>,
	Andrea Righi <arighi@nvidia.com>,
	Changwoo Min <changwoo@igalia.com>,
	Ching-Chun Huang <jserv@ccns.ncku.edu.tw>,
	Chia-Ping Tsai <chia7712@gmail.com>,
	chengyang.chou@mediatek.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] selftests/sched_ext: Move -rdynamic to LDFLAGS and append to it
Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2026 07:09:58 -1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <69b6f95a0a592588389a45c36f47c4c2@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260908134722.8671-3-yphbchou0911@gmail.com>

Hello,

On Tue, Sep 08, 2026 at 09:47:09PM +0800, Cheng-Yang Chou wrote:
> Unlike the demo schedulers, the selftest runner requires -rdynamic at
> link time to populate .dynsym for testcases. Additionally, LDFLAGS uses
> '=' rather than '+=', silently discarding USERLDFLAGS from lib.mk.

The runner doesn't need -rdynamic. Testcases register through constructors
calling scx_test_register() and nothing in the selftests, tools/sched_ext or
libbpf looks up symbols dynamically or prints backtraces. The flag was copied
from the BPF selftests where the test_progs crash handler needs it for
backtrace symbolization. Please drop -rdynamic here too, as in the first
patch. The '=' to '+=' change is good, keep that.

Thanks.

--
tejun

  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-08 17:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-08 13:47 [PATCH sched_ext/for-7.4 0/2] sched_ext: Clean up -rdynamic and LDFLAGS in Makefiles Cheng-Yang Chou
2026-09-08 13:47 ` [PATCH 1/2] tools/sched_ext: Drop the no-op -rdynamic from CFLAGS Cheng-Yang Chou
2026-09-08 13:47   ` [PATCH 2/2] selftests/sched_ext: Move -rdynamic to LDFLAGS and append to it Cheng-Yang Chou
2026-09-08 17:09     ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2026-09-09 14:55       ` Cheng-Yang Chou
2026-09-08 17:09   ` [PATCH 1/2] tools/sched_ext: Drop the no-op -rdynamic from CFLAGS Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=69b6f95a0a592588389a45c36f47c4c2@kernel.org \
    --to=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=arighi@nvidia.com \
    --cc=changwoo@igalia.com \
    --cc=chengyang.chou@mediatek.com \
    --cc=chia7712@gmail.com \
    --cc=jserv@ccns.ncku.edu.tw \
    --cc=sched-ext@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=void@manifault.com \
    --cc=yphbchou0911@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox