From: Andrea Righi <arighi@nvidia.com>
To: Cheng-Yang Chou <yphbchou0911@gmail.com>
Cc: sched-ext@lists.linux.dev, tj@kernel.org, void@manifault.com,
changwoo@igalia.com, jserv@ccns.ncku.edu.tw
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] sched_ext: Update demo schedulers and selftests to use scx_bpf_task_set_dsq_vtime()
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2026 07:41:47 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <abJgK3m8Z0ELfGrF@gpd4> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260312042001.955675-2-yphbchou0911@gmail.com>
Hi Cheng-Yang,
On Thu, Mar 12, 2026 at 12:20:00PM +0800, Cheng-Yang Chou wrote:
> Direct writes to p->scx.dsq_vtime are deprecated in favor of
> scx_bpf_task_set_dsq_vtime(). Update scx_simple, scx_flatcg, and
> select_cpu_vtime selftest to use the new kfunc.
>
> Use bpf_ksym_exists() to fall back to direct assignment on older kernels
> that don't have the new kfunc, preserving backwards compatibility.
>
> Signed-off-by: Cheng-Yang Chou <yphbchou0911@gmail.com>
> ---
> tools/sched_ext/scx_flatcg.bpf.c | 21 ++++++++++++++-----
> tools/sched_ext/scx_simple.bpf.c | 12 +++++++++--
> .../sched_ext/select_cpu_vtime.bpf.c | 13 ++++++++++--
> 3 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/sched_ext/scx_flatcg.bpf.c b/tools/sched_ext/scx_flatcg.bpf.c
> index a8a9234bb41e..27d99bb1e60f 100644
> --- a/tools/sched_ext/scx_flatcg.bpf.c
> +++ b/tools/sched_ext/scx_flatcg.bpf.c
> @@ -551,9 +551,14 @@ void BPF_STRUCT_OPS(fcg_stopping, struct task_struct *p, bool runnable)
> * too much, determine the execution time by taking explicit timestamps
> * instead of depending on @p->scx.slice.
> */
> - if (!fifo_sched)
> - p->scx.dsq_vtime +=
> - (SCX_SLICE_DFL - p->scx.slice) * 100 / p->scx.weight;
> + u64 delta = (SCX_SLICE_DFL - p->scx.slice) * 100 / p->scx.weight;
While at it, can we use:
u64 delta = scale_by_task_weight(p, SCX_SLICE_DFL - p->scx.slice);
> +
> + if (!fifo_sched) {
> + if (bpf_ksym_exists(scx_bpf_task_set_dsq_vtime___new))
> + scx_bpf_task_set_dsq_vtime___new(p, p->scx.dsq_vtime + delta);
> + else
> + p->scx.dsq_vtime += delta;
> + }
No, let's just use:
scx_bpf_task_set_dsq_vtime(p, p->scx.dsq_vtime + delta);
It's already doing the bpf_ksym_exists() logic internally, see
tools/sched_ext/include/scx/compat.bpf.h.
>
> taskc = bpf_task_storage_get(&task_ctx, p, 0, 0);
> if (!taskc) {
> @@ -822,7 +827,10 @@ s32 BPF_STRUCT_OPS(fcg_init_task, struct task_struct *p,
> if (!(cgc = find_cgrp_ctx(args->cgroup)))
> return -ENOENT;
>
> - p->scx.dsq_vtime = cgc->tvtime_now;
> + if (bpf_ksym_exists(scx_bpf_task_set_dsq_vtime___new))
> + scx_bpf_task_set_dsq_vtime___new(p, cgc->tvtime_now);
> + else
> + p->scx.dsq_vtime = cgc->tvtime_now;
Ditto.
>
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -924,7 +932,10 @@ void BPF_STRUCT_OPS(fcg_cgroup_move, struct task_struct *p,
> return;
>
> delta = time_delta(p->scx.dsq_vtime, from_cgc->tvtime_now);
> - p->scx.dsq_vtime = to_cgc->tvtime_now + delta;
> + if (bpf_ksym_exists(scx_bpf_task_set_dsq_vtime___new))
> + scx_bpf_task_set_dsq_vtime___new(p, to_cgc->tvtime_now + delta);
> + else
> + p->scx.dsq_vtime = to_cgc->tvtime_now + delta;
Ditto.
> }
>
> s32 BPF_STRUCT_OPS_SLEEPABLE(fcg_init)
> diff --git a/tools/sched_ext/scx_simple.bpf.c b/tools/sched_ext/scx_simple.bpf.c
> index b456bd7cae77..61d3bcf54ce7 100644
> --- a/tools/sched_ext/scx_simple.bpf.c
> +++ b/tools/sched_ext/scx_simple.bpf.c
> @@ -121,12 +121,20 @@ void BPF_STRUCT_OPS(simple_stopping, struct task_struct *p, bool runnable)
> * too much, determine the execution time by taking explicit timestamps
> * instead of depending on @p->scx.slice.
> */
> - p->scx.dsq_vtime += (SCX_SLICE_DFL - p->scx.slice) * 100 / p->scx.weight;
> + u64 delta = (SCX_SLICE_DFL - p->scx.slice) * 100 / p->scx.weight;
> +
> + if (bpf_ksym_exists(scx_bpf_task_set_dsq_vtime___new))
> + scx_bpf_task_set_dsq_vtime___new(p, p->scx.dsq_vtime + delta);
> + else
> + p->scx.dsq_vtime += delta;
Ditto.
> }
>
> void BPF_STRUCT_OPS(simple_enable, struct task_struct *p)
> {
> - p->scx.dsq_vtime = vtime_now;
> + if (bpf_ksym_exists(scx_bpf_task_set_dsq_vtime___new))
> + scx_bpf_task_set_dsq_vtime___new(p, vtime_now);
> + else
> + p->scx.dsq_vtime = vtime_now;
Ditto.
> }
>
> s32 BPF_STRUCT_OPS_SLEEPABLE(simple_init)
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/sched_ext/select_cpu_vtime.bpf.c b/tools/testing/selftests/sched_ext/select_cpu_vtime.bpf.c
> index bfcb96cd4954..17ed515c3e25 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/sched_ext/select_cpu_vtime.bpf.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/sched_ext/select_cpu_vtime.bpf.c
> @@ -66,12 +66,21 @@ void BPF_STRUCT_OPS(select_cpu_vtime_running, struct task_struct *p)
> void BPF_STRUCT_OPS(select_cpu_vtime_stopping, struct task_struct *p,
> bool runnable)
> {
> - p->scx.dsq_vtime += (SCX_SLICE_DFL - p->scx.slice) * 100 / p->scx.weight;
> + u64 delta = (SCX_SLICE_DFL - p->scx.slice) * 100 / p->scx.weight;
Ditto (scale_by_task_weight).
> +
> + if (bpf_ksym_exists(scx_bpf_task_set_dsq_vtime___new))
> + scx_bpf_task_set_dsq_vtime___new(p, p->scx.dsq_vtime + delta);
> + else
> + p->scx.dsq_vtime += delta;
> +
Ditto.
> }
>
> void BPF_STRUCT_OPS(select_cpu_vtime_enable, struct task_struct *p)
> {
> - p->scx.dsq_vtime = vtime_now;
> + if (bpf_ksym_exists(scx_bpf_task_set_dsq_vtime___new))
> + scx_bpf_task_set_dsq_vtime___new(p, vtime_now);
> + else
> + p->scx.dsq_vtime = vtime_now;
Ditto.
> }
>
> s32 BPF_STRUCT_OPS_SLEEPABLE(select_cpu_vtime_init)
> --
> 2.48.1
>
Thanks,
-Andrea
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-12 6:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-12 4:19 [PATCH 0/2] sched_ext: Update demo schedulers and selftests for deprecated APIs Cheng-Yang Chou
2026-03-12 4:20 ` [PATCH 1/2] sched_ext: Update demo schedulers and selftests to use scx_bpf_task_set_dsq_vtime() Cheng-Yang Chou
2026-03-12 6:41 ` Andrea Righi [this message]
2026-03-12 4:20 ` [PATCH 2/2] sched_ext: Update demo schedulers and selftests to drop ops.cpu_acquire/release() Cheng-Yang Chou
2026-03-12 7:40 ` Andrea Righi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=abJgK3m8Z0ELfGrF@gpd4 \
--to=arighi@nvidia.com \
--cc=changwoo@igalia.com \
--cc=jserv@ccns.ncku.edu.tw \
--cc=sched-ext@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=void@manifault.com \
--cc=yphbchou0911@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox