From: Andrea Righi <arighi@nvidia.com>
To: Samuele Mariotti <smariotti@disroot.org>
Cc: tj@kernel.org, void@manifault.com, changwoo@igalia.com,
sched-ext@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@unimore.it>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 1/1] sched_ext: Fix spurious WARN on stale ops_state in ops_dequeue()
Date: Thu, 21 May 2026 18:45:25 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ag82paswEla1JYa8@gpd4> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260521105911.1814606-2-smariotti@disroot.org>
Hi Samuele,
On Thu, May 21, 2026 at 12:59:11PM +0200, Samuele Mariotti wrote:
> ops_dequeue() can race with finish_dispatch() and spuriously trigger the
> "queued task must be in BPF scheduler's custody" warning.
>
> ops_dequeue() snapshots p->scx.ops_state via atomic_long_read_acquire()
> and then, in the SCX_OPSS_QUEUED arm, asserts that SCX_TASK_IN_CUSTODY
> is set. The two reads are not atomic w.r.t. a concurrent
> finish_dispatch() running on another CPU:
>
> CPU 1 CPU 2
> ===== =====
> dequeue_task_scx()
> ops_dequeue()
> opss = read_acquire(ops_state)
> = SCX_OPSS_QUEUED
> finish_dispatch()
> cmpxchg ops_state:
> SCX_OPSS_QUEUED -> SCX_OPSS_DISPATCHING [succeeds]
> dispatch_enqueue(SCX_DSQ_GLOBAL,
> SCX_ENQ_CLEAR_OPSS)
> call_task_dequeue()
> p->scx.flags &= ~SCX_TASK_IN_CUSTODY
> WARN_ON_ONCE(!(p->scx.flags &
> SCX_TASK_IN_CUSTODY))
> /* opss is stale: QUEUED,
> * but task already claimed */
> set_release(ops_state, SCX_OPSS_NONE)
>
> The race has been observed via two distinct call chains: the most common
> goes through sched_setaffinity(), a rarer variant through
> sched_change_begin().
>
> For SCX_DSQ_GLOBAL / SCX_DSQ_BYPASS, dispatch_enqueue() clears
> SCX_TASK_IN_CUSTODY before clearing ops_state to SCX_OPSS_NONE
> (intentional, to avoid concurrent non-atomic RMW of p->scx.flags against
> ops_dequeue()). The window between those two writes is exactly what
> ops_dequeue() observes as "QUEUED without custody".
>
> The observed state is not actually inconsistent, it just means CPU 1 has
> already claimed the task and the QUEUED value held by CPU 2 is stale.
> Re-read ops_state in that case; the next read is guaranteed to return
> SCX_OPSS_DISPATCHING or SCX_OPSS_NONE, both of which exit the switch
> cleanly. The retry is bounded: once IN_CUSTODY is cleared, ops_state has
> already advanced past QUEUED for this dispatch cycle, and a fresh QUEUED
> would require re-enqueue under p's rq lock, which CPU 2 holds.
>
> Changes in v2:
> - Use READ_ONCE() for p->scx.flags to ensure fresh reads and prevent
> compiler reordering in the lockless path
> - Add cpu_relax() to reduce power consumption and improve performance
> during the spin-wait
> - Use unlikely() to optimize branch prediction for the common case
> - Expand the in-code comment to document the race condition and
> bounded retry guarantee
>
> Fixes: ebf1ccff79c4 ("sched_ext: Fix ops.dequeue() semantics")
> Suggested-by: Andrea Righi <arighi@nvidia.com>
> Signed-off-by: Samuele Mariotti <smariotti@disroot.org>
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@unimore.it>
Looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Andrea Righi <arighi@nvidia.com>
Thanks,
-Andrea
> ---
> kernel/sched/ext.c | 17 +++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/ext.c b/kernel/sched/ext.c
> index 547ca398f646..c1762420cc35 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/ext.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/ext.c
> @@ -2078,6 +2078,7 @@ static void ops_dequeue(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, u64 deq_flags)
> /* dequeue is always temporary, don't reset runnable_at */
> clr_task_runnable(p, false);
>
> +retry:
> /* acquire ensures that we see the preceding updates on QUEUED */
> opss = atomic_long_read_acquire(&p->scx.ops_state);
>
> @@ -2091,8 +2092,20 @@ static void ops_dequeue(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, u64 deq_flags)
> */
> BUG();
> case SCX_OPSS_QUEUED:
> - /* A queued task must always be in BPF scheduler's custody */
> - WARN_ON_ONCE(!(p->scx.flags & SCX_TASK_IN_CUSTODY));
> + /*
> + * A queued task must always be in BPF scheduler's custody. If
> + * SCX_TASK_IN_CUSTODY is clear, finish_dispatch() on another
> + * CPU has already passed call_task_dequeue() (which clears the
> + * flag), but has not yet written SCX_OPSS_NONE. That final
> + * store does not require this rq's lock, so retrying with
> + * cpu_relax() is bounded: we will observe NONE (or DISPATCHING,
> + * handled by the fallthrough) on a subsequent iteration.
> + */
> + if (unlikely(!(READ_ONCE(p->scx.flags) & SCX_TASK_IN_CUSTODY))) {
> + cpu_relax();
> + goto retry;
> + }
> +
> if (atomic_long_try_cmpxchg(&p->scx.ops_state, &opss,
> SCX_OPSS_NONE))
> break;
> --
> 2.54.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-21 16:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-21 10:59 [PATCH V2 0/1] sched_ext: Fix spurious WARN on stale ops_state in ops_dequeue() Samuele Mariotti
2026-05-21 10:59 ` [PATCH V2 1/1] " Samuele Mariotti
2026-05-21 16:45 ` Andrea Righi [this message]
2026-05-21 16:29 ` [PATCH V2 0/1] " Tejun Heo
2026-05-21 16:30 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ag82paswEla1JYa8@gpd4 \
--to=arighi@nvidia.com \
--cc=changwoo@igalia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paolo.valente@unimore.it \
--cc=sched-ext@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=smariotti@disroot.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=void@manifault.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox