From: Andrea Righi <arighi@nvidia.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, David Vernet <void@manifault.com>,
Changwoo Min <changwoo@igalia.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>,
Christian Loehle <christian.loehle@arm.com>,
Phil Auld <pauld@redhat.com>, Koba Ko <kobak@nvidia.com>,
Joel Fernandes <joelagnelf@nvidia.com>,
Richard Cheng <icheng@nvidia.com>,
Cheng-Yang Chou <yphbchou0911@gmail.com>,
sched-ext@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] sched_ext: Auto-register/unregister dl_server reservations
Date: Fri, 22 May 2026 12:02:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ahApoVJfD9AJvdeW@gpd4> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260522083655.GM3126523@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Hi Peter,
On Fri, May 22, 2026 at 10:36:55AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, May 21, 2026 at 07:33:56PM +0200, Andrea Righi wrote:
>
> > diff --git a/kernel/sched/ext.c b/kernel/sched/ext.c
> > index 9c458552d14ff..15ba49fcba9af 100644
> > --- a/kernel/sched/ext.c
> > +++ b/kernel/sched/ext.c
> > @@ -6061,6 +6061,7 @@ static void scx_root_disable(struct scx_sched *sch)
> > {
> > struct scx_task_iter sti;
> > struct task_struct *p;
> > + bool was_switched_all;
> > int cpu;
> >
> > /* guarantee forward progress and wait for descendants to be disabled */
> > @@ -6087,6 +6088,13 @@ static void scx_root_disable(struct scx_sched *sch)
> > */
> > mutex_lock(&scx_enable_mutex);
> >
> > + /*
> > + * Snapshot the full vs partial mode before clearing the static
> > + * branch, so the dl_server re-balance below knows whether the
> > + * fair_server reservation needs to be reinstated.
> > + */
> > + was_switched_all = scx_switched_all();
> > +
> > static_branch_disable(&__scx_switched_all);
> > WRITE_ONCE(scx_switching_all, false);
> >
> > @@ -6136,10 +6144,24 @@ static void scx_root_disable(struct scx_sched *sch)
> > /*
> > * Invalidate all the rq clocks to prevent getting outdated
> > * rq clocks from a previous scx scheduler.
> > + *
> > + * Also re-balance the dl_server bandwidth reservations: detach
> > + * ext_server (no more sched_ext tasks) and reinstate fair_server
> > + * if it was previously detached because we were running in full
> > + * mode. Detach before attach to avoid a transient overflow of the
> > + * root domain's bandwidth capacity.
> > */
> > for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> > struct rq *rq = cpu_rq(cpu);
> > +
> > scx_rq_clock_invalidate(rq);
> > +
> > + scoped_guard(rq_lock_irqsave, rq) {
> > + dl_server_detach_bw(&rq->ext_server);
> > + if (was_switched_all &&
> > + WARN_ON_ONCE(dl_server_attach_bw(&rq->fair_server)))
> > + pr_warn("failed to re-attach fair_server on CPU %d\n", cpu);
> > + }
> > }
> >
> > /* no task is on scx, turn off all the switches and flush in-progress calls */
> > @@ -7314,6 +7336,27 @@ static void scx_root_enable_workfn(struct kthread_work *work)
> > if (!(ops->flags & SCX_OPS_SWITCH_PARTIAL))
> > static_branch_enable(&__scx_switched_all);
> >
> > + /*
> > + * Re-balance the dl_server bandwidth reservations.
> > + *
> > + * In full mode (!SCX_OPS_SWITCH_PARTIAL) no task will ever run in
> > + * the fair class, so detach the fair_server reservation and give
> > + * that bandwidth back to the RT class. Always attach the
> > + * ext_server reservation since sched_ext tasks are now possible.
> > + *
> > + * Detach before attach to avoid a transient overflow of the root
> > + * domain's bandwidth capacity.
> > + */
> > + for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> > + struct rq *rq = cpu_rq(cpu);
> > +
> > + guard(rq_lock_irqsave)(rq);
> > + if (scx_switched_all())
> > + dl_server_detach_bw(&rq->fair_server);
> > + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(dl_server_attach_bw(&rq->ext_server)))
> > + pr_warn("failed to attach ext_server on CPU %d\n", cpu);
> > + }
> > +
> > pr_info("sched_ext: BPF scheduler \"%s\" enabled%s\n",
> > sch->ops.name, scx_switched_all() ? "" : " (partial)");
> > kobject_uevent(&sch->kobj, KOBJ_ADD);
>
> For switching *to* scx, I think it makes sense to attach ext_server
> early and fail the switch if the attach fails. And only after the
> switch, conditionally detach fair_server.
>
> Since switching back to fair is a recovery path, this isn't really an
> option -- the only actual option is keeping the fair_server reservation,
> but that isn't ideal either.
Makes sense, I'll restructure the enable path to attach ext_server early (before
any commit, failing with -EBUSY if needed) and defer the fair_server detach
until after the switch is fully committed.
I'll send a new version with this change, along with the fixes to the other
issues reported by Sashiko.
Thanks,
-Andrea
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-22 10:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-21 17:33 [PATCHSET sched_ext/for-7.2] sched_ext: Auto-manage ext/fair dl_server bandwidth Andrea Righi
2026-05-21 17:33 ` [PATCH 1/2] sched_ext: Auto-register/unregister dl_server reservations Andrea Righi
2026-05-21 18:23 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-22 8:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-05-22 10:02 ` Andrea Righi [this message]
2026-05-21 17:33 ` [PATCH 2/2] selftests/sched_ext: Validate dl_server attach/detach in total_bw test Andrea Righi
2026-05-21 18:31 ` sashiko-bot
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-05-26 8:27 [PATCHSET v2 sched_ext/for-7.2] sched_ext: Auto-manage ext/fair dl_server bandwidth Andrea Righi
2026-05-26 8:27 ` [PATCH 1/2] sched_ext: Auto-register/unregister dl_server reservations Andrea Righi
2026-05-26 9:22 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-26 16:42 [PATCHSET v3 sched_ext/for-7.2] sched_ext: Auto-manage ext/fair dl_server bandwidth Andrea Righi
2026-05-26 16:42 ` [PATCH 1/2] sched_ext: Auto-register/unregister dl_server reservations Andrea Righi
2026-05-26 17:14 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-28 11:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-05-28 16:13 ` Andrea Righi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ahApoVJfD9AJvdeW@gpd4 \
--to=arighi@nvidia.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=changwoo@igalia.com \
--cc=christian.loehle@arm.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=icheng@nvidia.com \
--cc=joelagnelf@nvidia.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kobak@nvidia.com \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pauld@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sched-ext@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=void@manifault.com \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
--cc=yphbchou0911@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox