From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D942A22083; Sat, 11 Jul 2026 23:39:21 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1783813162; cv=none; b=ZApbgpXYLo4kxmU8LbxirZYYThaajcDRc/SV9Xv41wY9u9lABOxJHfP6iyfAus4IQ94kiPyHARJpDFo8DlcnnIP7YaTYD8vPDutLU5TaM4INVngxNOHeWr8lYhrU8E/iQjZyvqqfTdwICXHkziLa+osKgsUsokvby3OoifVTIQg= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1783813162; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Ix6EaQ4AZEKzYnQtBJLPhEhMiHnwivHrSizMAEPrzVw=; h=Message-ID:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=mdt1ycNoK1eoXoi1F7uSsn4bNF2BzK3wvJeSYIqSYpDcR+CZxGu9XxTq2/TXlsxk9QU8MRLhjV+JnLKEeTEcmx0r8xQIfy5U53ZnblQGGkwG3T4WF3Ynn8VxR+lp8oDKvU8yZa+o011sZsaxkjNGN9BBk+6hfMbtqbpeJJGKQSc= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=gICOflyv; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="gICOflyv" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 39F771F000E9; Sat, 11 Jul 2026 23:39:21 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1783813161; bh=6rTitmnwB3slWkXkkO06jq9wjcjVhrdMYERBFoHzaew=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=gICOflyv39hhIh2BVE9kY0OBaVfPjYFRGkxRrJkSOUDBrjkaY9FRgVvEvEOV5fG7C QpHtyvd/xXcx0AmizvllQz97s1Pe8hN4S0aPoh2x4CH22rKNL2DUhghEHPiOWW2Q5E ktqIBlYQvXhdvY49znv0bm4rU+ov2eQLawbOMoMyrQeVICPTrg7/vS0vY+eqh+K19e MDWv9/ChmmdPY3/M8kGjejYfec1GEta7AoMIKuO0b1uOpTSHrAkwc/xRDzGeSTjttI CeJhATAnYZNcXkgEwSKjQ0pvEzubpElVwfeUQLXi6Nz/6gYWctzDpbJwV+xjNs8HB3 9cmpp3RP2v5gA== Message-ID: From: Tejun Heo To: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi Cc: Nicholas Dudar , ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, andrii@kernel.org, eddyz87@gmail.com, emil@etsalapatis.com, void@manifault.com, arighi@nvidia.com, changwoo@igalia.com, bpf@vger.kernel.org, sched-ext@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 0/2] bpf: require an owned cpumask for bpf_cpumask_populate() In-Reply-To: References: <20260709182800.2037938-1-main.kalliope@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2026 13:38:09 -1000 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: sched-ext@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Hello, On Fri, Jul 10, 2026 at 09:17:08PM +0200, Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi wrote: > Hi sched-ext folks, this fix looks good to me and on cursory look, apart from > potential signature change which may require some adjustment to casts, it should > not break existing intendended usage. > > Could others confirm this? Thanks AFAICS, this shouldn't break anything. Acked-by: Tejun Heo Thanks. -- tejun