Sched_ext development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Tejun Heo" <tj@kernel.org>, sched-ext@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/15] sched_ext: Fix queued bypassed tasks stalling when the host loses SCX_CAP_BASE
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2026 05:47:46 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-182331@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261023052452.2889061-16-tj@kernel.org>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] sched_ext: bypass_lb_reenq_home() strands tasks and ejects wrong scheduler
--

commit d55be0297257c9718ad7fd18c39f7e2d5c53c076
Author: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>

sched_ext: Fix queued bypassed tasks stalling when the host loses SCX_CAP_BASE

This commit updates the bypass load balancer to drain bypass DSQs on CPUs
where the host scheduler loses SCX_CAP_BASE, reenqueuing tasks at their home
CPU when no donee CPU can accept them or when a move is refused. It also kicks
the balancer timer immediately upon SCX_CAP_BASE loss and uses timer_reduce()
when arming the timer to preserve pending kicks.

> diff --git a/kernel/sched/ext/ext.c b/kernel/sched/ext/ext.c
> index 562213f371a61..38d1b9176bd56 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/ext/ext.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/ext/ext.c
> @@ -6515,36 +6515,57 @@ bool scx_hardlockup(int cpu)
>  	return true;
>  }
>  
> +/**
> + * bypass_lb_reenq_home - Reenqueue a task at its home from the balancer
> + * @rq: @p's home rq, locked
> + * @p: task off any DSQ, taken from the bypass DSQ of @dsq_cpu
> + * @dsq_cpu: cpu whose bypass DSQ gave up @p
> + *
> + * @p came off the bypass DSQ of @dsq_cpu with no donee able to take it. The
> + * enqueue sends @p to rescue when the host lacks %SCX_CAP_BASE at home and to
> + * the home's bypass DSQ otherwise, see bypass_enq_target_dsq(). No DSQ lock may
> + * be held, as the enqueue takes one.
> + */
> +static void bypass_lb_reenq_home(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, s32 dsq_cpu)
> +{
> +	lockdep_assert_rq_held(rq);
> +
> +	WARN_ON_ONCE(p->scx.flags & SCX_TASK_REENQ_REASON_MASK);
> +	p->scx.flags |= SCX_TASK_REENQ_CAP;
> +	p->scx.reenq_reason_caps = SCX_CAP_BASE;
> +	p->scx.reenq_reason_cid = __scx_cpu_to_cid(dsq_cpu);
> +	scx_do_enqueue_task(rq, p, SCX_ENQ_REENQ, -1);
> +}

[Severity: High]
Can calling scx_do_enqueue_task() with SCX_ENQ_REENQ from
bypass_lb_reenq_home() permanently strand p off all DSQs while p is already
in bypass mode, and target the wrong scheduler for SCX_EXIT_ERROR_REENQ?

In bypass_lb_move(), p is unlinked from donor_dsq (setting p->scx.dsq = NULL)
before calling bypass_lb_reenq_home(). Inside scx_do_enqueue_task(), sch is
initialized to scx_task_sched(p), and the SCX_ENQ_REENQ repeat check runs
before the scx_bypassing() check:

kernel/sched/ext/ext.c:scx_do_enqueue_task() {
    ...
	if (enq_flags & SCX_ENQ_REENQ) {
		if (++p->scx.reenq_cnt > 1)
			__scx_add_event(sch, SCX_EV_REENQ_REPEAT, 1);

		if (unlikely(p->scx.reenq_cnt > SCX_REENQ_MAX_REPEAT)) {
			__scx_exit(sch, SCX_EXIT_ERROR_REENQ, 0, cpu_of(rq),
				   "%s[%d] reenqueued %u times without running",
				   p->comm, p->pid, p->scx.reenq_cnt);
			goto out;
		}
	}

	if (!scx_rq_online(rq))
		goto local;

	if (scx_bypassing(sch, cpu_of(rq))) {
		__scx_add_event(sch, SCX_EV_BYPASS_DISPATCH, 1);
		goto bypass;
	}
    ...
}

When p->scx.reenq_cnt exceeds SCX_REENQ_MAX_REPEAT, scx_do_enqueue_task()
jumps to out with action == ENQ_ACTION_NONE, leaving p off all DSQs while
SCX_TASK_QUEUED and p->on_rq remain set.

In normal operation, stranding p at goto out relies on __scx_exit()
subsequently running scx_disable_workfn() -> scx_bypass(sch, true), where
inc_bypass_depth(sch) transitions sch->bypass_depth from 0 to 1 and sweeps
rq->scx.runnable_list to place p onto a bypass DSQ:

kernel/sched/ext/ext.c:scx_bypass() {
    ...
	if (bypass) {
		changed = inc_bypass_depth(sch);
		if (changed)
			enable_bypass_dsp(sch);
	} else {
		changed = dec_bypass_depth(sch);
	}
    ...
	if (!changed)
		goto unlock;
    ...
}

However, any task queued on a bypass DSQ already has its owning scheduler
sch = scx_task_sched(p) in bypass mode (sch->bypass_depth >= 1). This appears
to cause two issues when bypass_lb_reenq_home() is called:

1. Immediate stranding on the first bypass_lb_reenq_home() call:
If a task triggered SCX_EXIT_ERROR_REENQ in normal operation (leaving
p->scx.reenq_cnt == SCX_REENQ_MAX_REPEAT + 1) or entered scx_bypass(sch, true)
with p->scx.reenq_cnt == SCX_REENQ_MAX_REPEAT, scx_bypass(sch, true) cycles p
through dequeue_task_scx() -> ops_dequeue() -> clr_task_runnable(p, false) and
enqueue_task_scx(). Because clr_task_runnable() only resets p->scx.reenq_cnt
when reset_runnable_at is true:

kernel/sched/ext/ext.c:clr_task_runnable() {
	list_del_init(&p->scx.runnable_node);
	WRITE_ONCE(p->scx.runnable_cpu, -1);
	if (reset_runnable_at) {
		p->scx.flags |= SCX_TASK_RESET_RUNNABLE_AT;
		p->scx.reenq_cnt = 0;
	}
}

p is placed onto the bypass DSQ with p->scx.reenq_cnt >= SCX_REENQ_MAX_REPEAT.
If bypass_lb_reenq_home() is then called on p (even once to send p to the
rescue DSQ when the host loses SCX_CAP_BASE, or when a donee refuses the
move), ++p->scx.reenq_cnt > SCX_REENQ_MAX_REPEAT triggers before reaching
goto bypass and strands p off all DSQs.

2. Wrong scheduler ejection and stranding after SCX_REENQ_MAX_REPEAT passes:
Because the root scheduler never lacks SCX_CAP_BASE, a host scheduler whose
bypass DSQ is drained due to losing SCX_CAP_BASE is a non-bypassing ancestor
sub-scheduler (host = scx_exec_sched(sch, cpu_of(rq)) != sch), while
sch = scx_task_sched(p) is an already-bypassing descendant (for example, in
scx_sub_disable(sch) where sch->exit_kind is already SCX_EXIT_DONE and
scx_bypass(sch, true) has already completed).

When p is repeatedly reenqueued by bypass_lb_reenq_home() (for instance, on a
capless host CPU without rescue, or when task_can_run_on_remote_rq()
repeatedly refuses a move), __scx_exit(sch, SCX_EXIT_ERROR_REENQ, ...) targets
the already-bypassing descendant sch rather than the host scheduler that lacks
SCX_CAP_BASE. Neither sch nor host sweeps rq->scx.runnable_list for p
afterwards (if sch is disabling, __scx_exit() is a no-op and scx_bypass()
already ran; if sch is in bypass via PM or enable, a later scx_bypass(sch,
true) sees changed == false and skips the runnable_list sweep).

If p is stranded while holding a lock or inside a cgroup operation, could this
also block scx_sub_disable() or scx_root_disable() when waiting on
drain_descendants(), scx_enable_mutex, scx_fork_rwsem, or scx_cgroup_lock()?

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261023052452.2889061-1-tj@kernel.org?part=15

      reply	other threads:[~2026-10-23  5:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-23  5:24 [PATCHSET v2 sched_ext/for-7.4] sched_ext: Fix bypassed sub-scheduler tasks stalling when the host lacks caps Tejun Heo
2026-10-23  5:24 ` [PATCH 01/15] sched_ext: Pack scx_ent_flags' multi-bit fields at the top Tejun Heo
2026-10-23  5:24 ` [PATCH 02/15] sched_ext: Clear holding_cpu where the claim is confirmed Tejun Heo
2026-10-23  5:24 ` [PATCH 03/15] sched_ext: Fix bypassed tasks looping on a host without SCX_CAP_ENQ Tejun Heo
2026-10-23  5:48   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-23  5:24 ` [PATCH 04/15] sched_ext: Move refill_task_slice_dfl() below apply_slice_vtime() Tejun Heo
2026-10-23  5:24 ` [PATCH 05/15] sched_ext: Restore a rescuee's slice after ops.stopping() Tejun Heo
2026-10-23  5:54   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-23  5:24 ` [PATCH 06/15] sched_ext: Fix a cpu idling with a runnable rescuee Tejun Heo
2026-10-23  5:24 ` [PATCH 07/15] sched_ext: Mark the rescue grant as a kernel slice with SCX_TASK_KERNEL_SLICE Tejun Heo
2026-10-23  5:24 ` [PATCH 08/15] sched_ext: Refuse extending a kernel slice Tejun Heo
2026-10-23  5:24 ` [PATCH 09/15] sched_ext: Fix a cpu idling after put_prev_task_scx() queues its task on the local DSQ Tejun Heo
2026-10-23  5:24 ` [PATCH 10/15] sched_ext: Expire prev's slice in dispatch_one() under bypass Tejun Heo
2026-10-23  5:24 ` [PATCH 11/15] sched_ext: Fix bypassed tasks stalling when the host lacks SCX_CAP_BASE Tejun Heo
2026-10-23  5:24 ` [PATCH 12/15] sched_ext: Fix the bypass load balancer stranding tasks on cpus where " Tejun Heo
2026-10-23  5:24 ` [PATCH 13/15] sched_ext: Factor out bypass_lb_move() and insert with the donor DSQ unlocked Tejun Heo
2026-10-23  5:24 ` [PATCH 14/15] sched_ext: Let the bypass load balancer move tasks homed on other cpus Tejun Heo
2026-10-23  5:24 ` [PATCH 15/15] sched_ext: Fix queued bypassed tasks stalling when the host loses SCX_CAP_BASE Tejun Heo
2026-10-23  5:47   ` sashiko-bot [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-182331@kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=sched-ext@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox