Sched_ext development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Tejun Heo" <tj@kernel.org>, sched-ext@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 sched_ext/for-7.4-fixes] sched_ext: Fix stale pick when the donor changes during dispatch
Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2026 16:55:55 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-192051@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261031162803.541236-1-tj@kernel.org>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] sched_ext: dispatch_one() emits ops.cpu_acquire() before checking stale prev
--

commit 15726c74d0541a9ea4622e6efa11631d9ab6aea0
Author: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>

sched_ext: Fix stale pick when the donor changes during dispatch

This commit fixes a stale task pick in sched_ext when rq->donor changes
while the rq lock is dropped during dispatch under proxy execution or core
scheduling. It introduces scx_dsp_prev_stale() to detect when prev is no
longer rq->donor and restarts the pick with SCX_DSP_RETRY.

> diff --git a/kernel/sched/ext/ext.c b/kernel/sched/ext/ext.c
> index 0403c46342813..bcd1f7ee8c89b 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/ext/ext.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/ext/ext.c
> @@ -2950,6 +2950,12 @@ static enum scx_dsp_verdict dispatch_one(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev
>  		rq->scx.cpu_released = false;
>  	}
>  
> +	/* the ecaps sync may have dropped the rq lock */
> +	if (scx_dsp_prev_stale(rq, prev)) {
> +		verdict = SCX_DSP_RETRY;
> +		goto has_tasks;
> +	}

[Severity: Medium]
In dispatch_one(), scx_dsp_prev_stale() is checked after handling
rq->scx.cpu_released rather than immediately after
scx_process_sync_ecaps():

kernel/sched/ext/ext.c:dispatch_one() {
	...
	scx_process_sync_ecaps(rq, prev);

	if ((root_sch->ops.flags & SCX_OPS_HAS_CPU_PREEMPT) &&
	    unlikely(rq->scx.cpu_released)) {
		if (root_sch->ops.cpu_acquire)
			SCX_CALL_OP(root_sch, cpu_acquire, rq, cpu, NULL);
		rq->scx.cpu_released = false;
	}

	/* the ecaps sync may have dropped the rq lock */
	if (scx_dsp_prev_stale(rq, prev)) {
		verdict = SCX_DSP_RETRY;
		goto has_tasks;
	}
	...
}

When scx_process_sync_ecaps() drops the rq lock in
scx_flush_dispatch_buf(), a sibling CPU under core scheduling can switch
that rq to a higher-priority RT or DL task, running
put_prev_set_next_task() -> put_prev_task_scx() -> switch_class(), which
emits ops.cpu_release() and sets rq->scx.cpu_released = true. Under proxy
execution, if rq->scx.cpu_released was already true on entry, a remote
wakeup during that lock drop can reset rq->donor to a non-SCX rq->curr
while an RT or DL task becomes runnable.

When scx_process_sync_ecaps() returns, dispatch_one() will call
ops.cpu_acquire() and clear rq->scx.cpu_released = false before seeing
scx_dsp_prev_stale() and returning SCX_DSP_RETRY. If the restarted pick
then selects the higher-priority RT or DL task without reaching
ext_sched_class, and rq->donor is no longer an SCX task, switch_class()
will not run again to set rq->scx.cpu_released = true.

Should the scx_dsp_prev_stale() check be placed immediately after
scx_process_sync_ecaps(), before emitting ops.cpu_acquire() and clearing
rq->scx.cpu_released?

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261031162803.541236-1-tj@kernel.org?part=1

  reply	other threads:[~2026-10-31 16:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-31 16:28 [PATCH v4 sched_ext/for-7.4-fixes] sched_ext: Fix stale pick when the donor changes during dispatch Tejun Heo
2026-10-31 16:55 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-10-31 17:12   ` Tejun Heo
2026-11-01  6:55 ` Andrea Righi
2026-11-02  6:35 ` Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-192051@kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=sched-ext@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox