From: Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>
To: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
Cc: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, selinux@vger.kernel.org,
"John Johansen" <john.johansen@canonical.com>,
"Mimi Zohar" <zohar@linux.ibm.com>,
"Roberto Sassu" <roberto.sassu@huawei.com>,
"Fan Wu" <wufan@kernel.org>, "Mickaël Salaün" <mic@digikod.net>,
"Günther Noack" <gnoack@google.com>,
"Micah Morton" <mortonm@chromium.org>,
"Casey Schaufler" <casey@schaufler-ca.com>,
"Tetsuo Handa" <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 20/29] smack: move initcalls to the LSM framework
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2025 16:42:43 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202504091641.738FECED@keescook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250409185019.238841-51-paul@paul-moore.com>
On Wed, Apr 09, 2025 at 02:50:05PM -0400, Paul Moore wrote:
> As the LSM framework only supports one LSM initcall callback for each
> initcall type, the init_smk_fs() and smack_nf_ip_init() functions were
> wrapped with a new function, smack_initcall() that is registered with
> the LSM framework.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
> ---
> security/smack/smack.h | 6 ++++++
> security/smack/smack_lsm.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
> security/smack/smack_netfilter.c | 4 +---
> security/smack/smackfs.c | 4 +---
> 4 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/security/smack/smack.h b/security/smack/smack.h
> index bf6a6ed3946c..709e0d6cd5e1 100644
> --- a/security/smack/smack.h
> +++ b/security/smack/smack.h
> @@ -275,6 +275,12 @@ struct smk_audit_info {
> #endif
> };
>
> +/*
> + * Initialization
> + */
> +int init_smk_fs(void);
> +int smack_nf_ip_init(void);
> +
> /*
> * These functions are in smack_access.c
> */
> diff --git a/security/smack/smack_lsm.c b/security/smack/smack_lsm.c
> index e09b33fed5f0..80b129a0c92c 100644
> --- a/security/smack/smack_lsm.c
> +++ b/security/smack/smack_lsm.c
> @@ -5277,6 +5277,21 @@ static __init int smack_init(void)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static int smack_initcall(void)
> +{
> + int rc, rc_tmp;
> +
> + rc_tmp = init_smk_fs();
> + if (rc_tmp)
> + rc = rc_tmp;
> +
> + rc_tmp = smack_nf_ip_init();
> + if (!rc && rc_tmp)
> + rc = rc_tmp;
> +
> + return rc;
> +}
This retains the existing behavior, but I think it'd be better to
evaluate if the init_smk_fs() call can be tied to the fs init hook
instead, yes? Then no new helper is needed, etc.
-Kees
> +
> /*
> * Smack requires early initialization in order to label
> * all processes and objects when they are created.
> @@ -5286,4 +5301,5 @@ DEFINE_LSM(smack) = {
> .flags = LSM_FLAG_LEGACY_MAJOR | LSM_FLAG_EXCLUSIVE,
> .blobs = &smack_blob_sizes,
> .init = smack_init,
> + .initcall_device = smack_initcall,
> };
> diff --git a/security/smack/smack_netfilter.c b/security/smack/smack_netfilter.c
> index 8fd747b3653a..17ba578b1308 100644
> --- a/security/smack/smack_netfilter.c
> +++ b/security/smack/smack_netfilter.c
> @@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ static struct pernet_operations smack_net_ops = {
> .exit = smack_nf_unregister,
> };
>
> -static int __init smack_nf_ip_init(void)
> +int __init smack_nf_ip_init(void)
> {
> if (smack_enabled == 0)
> return 0;
> @@ -76,5 +76,3 @@ static int __init smack_nf_ip_init(void)
> printk(KERN_DEBUG "Smack: Registering netfilter hooks\n");
> return register_pernet_subsys(&smack_net_ops);
> }
> -
> -__initcall(smack_nf_ip_init);
> diff --git a/security/smack/smackfs.c b/security/smack/smackfs.c
> index 90a67e410808..d33dd0368807 100644
> --- a/security/smack/smackfs.c
> +++ b/security/smack/smackfs.c
> @@ -2980,7 +2980,7 @@ static struct vfsmount *smackfs_mount;
> * Returns true if we were not chosen on boot or if
> * we were chosen and filesystem registration succeeded.
> */
> -static int __init init_smk_fs(void)
> +int __init init_smk_fs(void)
> {
> int err;
> int rc;
> @@ -3023,5 +3023,3 @@ static int __init init_smk_fs(void)
>
> return err;
> }
> -
> -__initcall(init_smk_fs);
> --
> 2.49.0
>
--
Kees Cook
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-09 23:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 126+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-09 18:49 [RFC PATCH 0/29] Rework the LSM initialization Paul Moore
2025-04-09 18:49 ` [RFC PATCH 01/29] lsm: split the notifier code out into lsm_notifier.c Paul Moore
2025-04-09 21:17 ` Kees Cook
2025-04-15 12:14 ` John Johansen
2025-04-09 18:49 ` [RFC PATCH 02/29] lsm: split the init code out into lsm_init.c Paul Moore
2025-04-09 21:18 ` Kees Cook
2025-04-15 22:01 ` John Johansen
2025-04-09 18:49 ` [RFC PATCH 03/29] lsm: simplify prepare_lsm() and rename to lsm_prep_single() Paul Moore
2025-04-09 21:30 ` Kees Cook
2025-04-09 21:54 ` Paul Moore
2025-04-15 22:10 ` John Johansen
2025-04-09 18:49 ` [RFC PATCH 04/29] lsm: simplify ordered_lsm_init() and rename to lsm_init_ordered() Paul Moore
2025-04-09 21:38 ` Kees Cook
2025-04-09 22:31 ` Paul Moore
2025-04-09 18:49 ` [RFC PATCH 05/29] lsm: replace the name field with a pointer to the lsm_id struct Paul Moore
2025-04-09 21:40 ` Kees Cook
2025-04-15 22:20 ` John Johansen
2025-04-09 18:49 ` [RFC PATCH 06/29] lsm: cleanup and normalize the LSM order symbols naming Paul Moore
2025-04-09 23:00 ` Kees Cook
2025-04-15 22:23 ` John Johansen
2025-04-09 18:49 ` [RFC PATCH 07/29] lsm: rework lsm_active_cnt and lsm_idlist[] Paul Moore
2025-04-09 21:38 ` Casey Schaufler
2025-04-10 21:58 ` Paul Moore
2025-04-09 23:06 ` Kees Cook
2025-04-10 22:04 ` Paul Moore
2025-04-10 22:25 ` Kees Cook
2025-04-11 0:58 ` Casey Schaufler
2025-04-09 18:49 ` [RFC PATCH 08/29] lsm: get rid of the lsm_names list and do some cleanup Paul Moore
2025-04-09 23:13 ` Kees Cook
2025-04-10 22:47 ` Paul Moore
2025-04-11 2:15 ` Kees Cook
2025-04-11 3:14 ` Paul Moore
2025-04-15 22:30 ` John Johansen
2025-05-22 21:26 ` Casey Schaufler
2025-04-09 18:49 ` [RFC PATCH 09/29] lsm: cleanup and normalize the LSM enabled functions Paul Moore
2025-04-10 0:11 ` Kees Cook
2025-04-11 1:50 ` Paul Moore
2025-04-11 2:03 ` Paul Moore
2025-04-11 2:14 ` Paul Moore
2025-04-11 2:17 ` Kees Cook
2025-04-09 18:49 ` [RFC PATCH 10/29] lsm: cleanup the LSM blob size code Paul Moore
2025-04-09 23:29 ` Kees Cook
2025-04-15 23:02 ` John Johansen
2025-04-19 2:42 ` Fan Wu
2025-04-19 5:53 ` Kees Cook
2025-04-19 15:58 ` Fan Wu
2025-04-09 18:49 ` [RFC PATCH 11/29] lsm: cleanup initialize_lsm() and rename to lsm_init_single() Paul Moore
2025-04-09 23:30 ` Kees Cook
2025-04-15 23:04 ` John Johansen
2025-04-09 18:49 ` [RFC PATCH 12/29] lsm: cleanup the LSM ordered parsing Paul Moore
2025-04-09 18:49 ` [RFC PATCH 13/29] lsm: fold lsm_init_ordered() into security_init() Paul Moore
2025-04-09 18:49 ` [RFC PATCH 14/29] lsm: add missing function header comment blocks in lsm_init.c Paul Moore
2025-05-14 10:10 ` John Johansen
2025-04-09 18:50 ` [RFC PATCH 15/29] lsm: cleanup the debug and console output " Paul Moore
2025-04-09 18:50 ` [RFC PATCH 16/29] lsm: output available LSMs when debugging Paul Moore
2025-05-14 12:01 ` John Johansen
2025-04-09 18:50 ` [RFC PATCH 17/29] lsm: introduce an initcall mechanism into the LSM framework Paul Moore
2025-04-09 21:16 ` Kees Cook
2025-04-10 20:52 ` Paul Moore
2025-05-14 11:59 ` John Johansen
2025-04-09 18:50 ` [RFC PATCH 18/29] loadpin: move initcalls to " Paul Moore
2025-04-09 23:39 ` Kees Cook
2025-04-11 1:15 ` Paul Moore
2025-04-11 2:16 ` Kees Cook
2025-04-11 2:41 ` Paul Moore
2025-05-14 11:57 ` John Johansen
2025-04-09 18:50 ` [RFC PATCH 19/29] ipe: " Paul Moore
2025-04-09 23:40 ` Kees Cook
2025-04-14 21:19 ` Fan Wu
2025-04-15 1:58 ` Paul Moore
2025-05-14 12:02 ` John Johansen
2025-04-09 18:50 ` [RFC PATCH 20/29] smack: " Paul Moore
2025-04-09 23:42 ` Kees Cook [this message]
2025-04-11 2:30 ` Paul Moore
2025-04-10 17:30 ` Casey Schaufler
2025-04-10 17:47 ` Casey Schaufler
2025-04-11 20:09 ` Paul Moore
2025-04-14 21:04 ` Fan Wu
2025-04-15 1:54 ` Paul Moore
2025-04-09 18:50 ` [RFC PATCH 21/29] tomoyo: " Paul Moore
2025-04-09 23:43 ` Kees Cook
2025-05-14 12:05 ` John Johansen
2025-04-09 18:50 ` [RFC PATCH 22/29] safesetid: " Paul Moore
2025-04-09 23:43 ` Kees Cook
2025-04-11 19:20 ` Micah Morton
2025-04-11 20:45 ` Paul Moore
2025-05-14 12:18 ` John Johansen
2025-04-09 18:50 ` [RFC PATCH 23/29] apparmor: " Paul Moore
2025-04-09 23:44 ` Kees Cook
2025-05-14 13:33 ` John Johansen
2025-04-09 18:50 ` [RFC PATCH 24/29] lockdown: " Paul Moore
2025-04-09 23:44 ` Kees Cook
2025-05-14 13:31 ` John Johansen
2025-04-09 18:50 ` [RFC PATCH 25/29] ima,evm: " Paul Moore
2025-05-14 13:06 ` John Johansen
2025-06-11 20:09 ` Paul Moore
2025-05-30 22:03 ` Mimi Zohar
2025-06-11 20:27 ` Paul Moore
2025-06-13 20:34 ` Mimi Zohar
2025-07-21 21:59 ` Paul Moore
2025-04-09 18:50 ` [RFC PATCH 26/29] selinux: " Paul Moore
2025-04-10 16:33 ` Stephen Smalley
2025-04-11 3:24 ` Paul Moore
2025-05-23 15:12 ` Casey Schaufler
2025-04-09 18:50 ` [RFC PATCH 27/29] lsm: consolidate all of the LSM framework initcalls Paul Moore
2025-04-09 23:52 ` Kees Cook
2025-04-11 1:21 ` Paul Moore
2025-04-11 2:16 ` Kees Cook
2025-05-14 13:38 ` John Johansen
2025-04-09 18:50 ` [RFC PATCH 28/29] lsm: add a LSM_STARTED_ALL notification event Paul Moore
2025-04-09 23:53 ` Kees Cook
2025-05-14 13:34 ` John Johansen
2025-04-09 18:50 ` [RFC PATCH 29/29] lsm: add support for counting lsm_prop support among LSMs Paul Moore
2025-05-13 16:39 ` Casey Schaufler
2025-05-13 20:23 ` Paul Moore
2025-05-14 19:30 ` Casey Schaufler
2025-05-14 20:57 ` Paul Moore
2025-05-14 21:16 ` Casey Schaufler
2025-05-14 22:11 ` Paul Moore
2025-05-15 14:12 ` Casey Schaufler
2025-05-15 18:13 ` Paul Moore
2025-05-15 19:41 ` Casey Schaufler
2025-05-15 21:02 ` Paul Moore
2025-04-10 14:13 ` [RFC PATCH 0/29] Rework the LSM initialization Casey Schaufler
2025-04-10 16:31 ` Kees Cook
2025-04-11 2:28 ` Paul Moore
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202504091641.738FECED@keescook \
--to=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=casey@schaufler-ca.com \
--cc=gnoack@google.com \
--cc=john.johansen@canonical.com \
--cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mic@digikod.net \
--cc=mortonm@chromium.org \
--cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
--cc=penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp \
--cc=roberto.sassu@huawei.com \
--cc=selinux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wufan@kernel.org \
--cc=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).