From: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
To: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, selinux@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "John Johansen" <john.johansen@canonical.com>,
"Mimi Zohar" <zohar@linux.ibm.com>,
"Roberto Sassu" <roberto.sassu@huawei.com>,
"Fan Wu" <wufan@kernel.org>, "Mickaël Salaün" <mic@digikod.net>,
"Günther Noack" <gnoack@google.com>,
"Kees Cook" <kees@kernel.org>,
"Micah Morton" <mortonm@chromium.org>,
"Casey Schaufler" <casey@schaufler-ca.com>,
"Tetsuo Handa" <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
"Nicolas Bouchinet" <nicolas.bouchinet@oss.cyber.gouv.fr>,
"Xiu Jianfeng" <xiujianfeng@huawei.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH v2 12/34] lsm: rework the LSM enable/disable setter/getter functions
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2025 19:21:15 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250721232142.77224-48-paul@paul-moore.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250721232142.77224-36-paul@paul-moore.com>
In addition to style changes, rename set_enabled() to lsm_enabled_set()
and is_enabled() to lsm_is_enabled() to better fit within the LSM
initialization code.
Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
---
security/lsm_init.c | 62 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
diff --git a/security/lsm_init.c b/security/lsm_init.c
index 80b57aef38a0..14bb6f4b4628 100644
--- a/security/lsm_init.c
+++ b/security/lsm_init.c
@@ -10,6 +10,10 @@
#include "lsm.h"
+/* LSM enabled constants. */
+static __initdata int lsm_enabled_true = 1;
+static __initdata int lsm_enabled_false = 0;
+
/* Pointers to LSM sections defined in include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h */
extern struct lsm_info __start_lsm_info[], __end_lsm_info[];
extern struct lsm_info __start_early_lsm_info[], __end_early_lsm_info[];
@@ -75,37 +79,33 @@ static int __init lsm_debug_enable(char *str)
}
__setup("lsm.debug", lsm_debug_enable);
-/* Mark an LSM's enabled flag. */
-static int lsm_enabled_true __initdata = 1;
-static int lsm_enabled_false __initdata = 0;
-static void __init set_enabled(struct lsm_info *lsm, bool enabled)
+/**
+ * lsm_enabled_set - Mark a LSM as enabled
+ * @lsm: LSM definition
+ * @enabled: enabled flag
+ */
+static void __init lsm_enabled_set(struct lsm_info *lsm, bool enabled)
{
/*
* When an LSM hasn't configured an enable variable, we can use
* a hard-coded location for storing the default enabled state.
*/
- if (!lsm->enabled) {
- if (enabled)
- lsm->enabled = &lsm_enabled_true;
- else
- lsm->enabled = &lsm_enabled_false;
- } else if (lsm->enabled == &lsm_enabled_true) {
- if (!enabled)
- lsm->enabled = &lsm_enabled_false;
- } else if (lsm->enabled == &lsm_enabled_false) {
- if (enabled)
- lsm->enabled = &lsm_enabled_true;
+ if (!lsm->enabled ||
+ lsm->enabled == &lsm_enabled_true ||
+ lsm->enabled == &lsm_enabled_false) {
+ lsm->enabled = enabled ? &lsm_enabled_true : &lsm_enabled_false;
} else {
*lsm->enabled = enabled;
}
}
-static inline bool is_enabled(struct lsm_info *lsm)
+/**
+ * lsm_is_enabled - Determine if a LSM is enabled
+ * @lsm: LSM definition
+ */
+static inline bool lsm_is_enabled(struct lsm_info *lsm)
{
- if (!lsm->enabled)
- return false;
-
- return *lsm->enabled;
+ return (lsm->enabled ? *lsm->enabled : false);
}
/* Is an LSM already listed in the ordered LSMs list? */
@@ -139,7 +139,7 @@ static void __init append_ordered_lsm(struct lsm_info *lsm, const char *from)
lsm_idlist[last_lsm++] = lsm->id;
init_debug("%s ordered: %s (%s)\n", from, lsm->id->name,
- is_enabled(lsm) ? "enabled" : "disabled");
+ lsm_is_enabled(lsm) ? "enabled" : "disabled");
}
static void __init lsm_set_blob_size(int *need, int *lbs)
@@ -162,17 +162,17 @@ static void __init lsm_prepare(struct lsm_info *lsm)
{
struct lsm_blob_sizes *blobs;
- if (!is_enabled(lsm)) {
- set_enabled(lsm, false);
+ if (!lsm_is_enabled(lsm)) {
+ lsm_enabled_set(lsm, false);
return;
} else if ((lsm->flags & LSM_FLAG_EXCLUSIVE) && lsm_exclusive) {
init_debug("exclusive disabled: %s\n", lsm->id->name);
- set_enabled(lsm, false);
+ lsm_enabled_set(lsm, false);
return;
}
/* Mark the LSM as enabled. */
- set_enabled(lsm, true);
+ lsm_enabled_set(lsm, true);
if ((lsm->flags & LSM_FLAG_EXCLUSIVE) && !lsm_exclusive) {
init_debug("exclusive chosen: %s\n", lsm->id->name);
lsm_exclusive = lsm;
@@ -203,7 +203,7 @@ static void __init lsm_prepare(struct lsm_info *lsm)
/* Initialize a given LSM, if it is enabled. */
static void __init initialize_lsm(struct lsm_info *lsm)
{
- if (is_enabled(lsm)) {
+ if (lsm_is_enabled(lsm)) {
int ret;
init_debug("initializing %s\n", lsm->id->name);
@@ -237,7 +237,7 @@ static void __init ordered_lsm_parse(const char *order, const char *origin)
lsm_for_each_raw(major) {
if ((major->flags & LSM_FLAG_LEGACY_MAJOR) &&
strcmp(major->id->name, lsm_order_legacy) != 0) {
- set_enabled(major, false);
+ lsm_enabled_set(major, false);
init_debug("security=%s disabled: %s (only one legacy major LSM)\n",
lsm_order_legacy, major->id->name);
}
@@ -283,7 +283,7 @@ static void __init ordered_lsm_parse(const char *order, const char *origin)
lsm_for_each_raw(lsm) {
if (exists_ordered_lsm(lsm))
continue;
- set_enabled(lsm, false);
+ lsm_enabled_set(lsm, false);
init_debug("%s skipped: %s (not in requested order)\n",
origin, lsm->id->name);
}
@@ -316,12 +316,12 @@ static void __init lsm_init_ordered(void)
pr_info("initializing lsm=");
lsm_early_for_each_raw(early) {
- if (is_enabled(early))
+ if (lsm_is_enabled(early))
pr_cont("%s%s",
first++ == 0 ? "" : ",", early->id->name);
}
lsm_order_for_each(lsm) {
- if (is_enabled(*lsm))
+ if (lsm_is_enabled(*lsm))
pr_cont("%s%s",
first++ == 0 ? "" : ",", (*lsm)->id->name);
}
@@ -434,7 +434,7 @@ int __init security_init(void)
*/
lsm_early_for_each_raw(lsm) {
init_debug(" early started: %s (%s)\n", lsm->id->name,
- is_enabled(lsm) ? "enabled" : "disabled");
+ lsm_is_enabled(lsm) ? "enabled" : "disabled");
}
/* Load LSMs in specified order. */
--
2.50.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-21 23:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 77+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-21 23:21 [RFC PATCH v2 0/34] Rework the LSM initialization Paul Moore
2025-07-21 23:21 ` [RFC PATCH v2 01/34] lsm: split the notifier code out into lsm_notifier.c Paul Moore
2025-07-24 14:49 ` Casey Schaufler
2025-07-21 23:21 ` [RFC PATCH v2 02/34] lsm: split the init code out into lsm_init.c Paul Moore
2025-07-24 14:50 ` Casey Schaufler
2025-07-21 23:21 ` [RFC PATCH v2 03/34] lsm: consolidate lsm_allowed() and prepare_lsm() into lsm_prepare() Paul Moore
2025-07-24 14:52 ` Casey Schaufler
2025-07-21 23:21 ` [RFC PATCH v2 04/34] lsm: introduce looping macros for the initialization code Paul Moore
2025-07-24 15:10 ` Casey Schaufler
2025-07-21 23:21 ` [RFC PATCH v2 05/34] lsm: integrate report_lsm_order() code into caller Paul Moore
2025-07-24 15:19 ` Casey Schaufler
2025-07-21 23:21 ` [RFC PATCH v2 06/34] lsm: integrate lsm_early_cred() and lsm_early_task() " Paul Moore
2025-07-24 15:20 ` Casey Schaufler
2025-07-21 23:21 ` [RFC PATCH v2 07/34] lsm: rename ordered_lsm_init() to lsm_init_ordered() Paul Moore
2025-07-24 15:28 ` Casey Schaufler
2025-07-21 23:21 ` [RFC PATCH v2 08/34] lsm: replace the name field with a pointer to the lsm_id struct Paul Moore
2025-07-24 15:30 ` Casey Schaufler
2025-07-21 23:21 ` [RFC PATCH v2 09/34] lsm: rename the lsm order variables for consistency Paul Moore
2025-07-24 15:31 ` Casey Schaufler
2025-07-21 23:21 ` [RFC PATCH v2 10/34] lsm: rework lsm_active_cnt and lsm_idlist[] Paul Moore
2025-07-24 15:34 ` Casey Schaufler
2025-07-25 0:26 ` Paul Moore
2025-07-21 23:21 ` [RFC PATCH v2 11/34] lsm: get rid of the lsm_names list and do some cleanup Paul Moore
2025-07-24 15:39 ` Casey Schaufler
2025-07-25 2:28 ` Paul Moore
2025-07-25 14:26 ` Casey Schaufler
2025-07-25 16:42 ` Paul Moore
2025-07-21 23:21 ` Paul Moore [this message]
2025-07-24 15:44 ` [RFC PATCH v2 12/34] lsm: rework the LSM enable/disable setter/getter functions Casey Schaufler
2025-07-21 23:21 ` [RFC PATCH v2 13/34] lsm: rename exists_ordered_lsm() to lsm_order_exists() Paul Moore
2025-07-24 15:45 ` Casey Schaufler
2025-07-21 23:21 ` [RFC PATCH v2 14/34] lsm: rename/rework append_ordered_lsm() into lsm_order_append() Paul Moore
2025-07-24 15:47 ` Casey Schaufler
2025-07-21 23:21 ` [RFC PATCH v2 15/34] lsm: rename/rework ordered_lsm_parse() to lsm_order_parse() Paul Moore
2025-07-24 15:48 ` Casey Schaufler
2025-07-21 23:21 ` [RFC PATCH v2 16/34] lsm: cleanup the LSM blob size code Paul Moore
2025-07-24 23:28 ` Casey Schaufler
2025-07-21 23:21 ` [RFC PATCH v2 17/34] lsm: cleanup initialize_lsm() and rename to lsm_init_single() Paul Moore
2025-07-24 23:29 ` Casey Schaufler
2025-07-21 23:21 ` [RFC PATCH v2 18/34] lsm: fold lsm_init_ordered() into security_init() Paul Moore
2025-07-24 23:30 ` Casey Schaufler
2025-07-21 23:21 ` [RFC PATCH v2 19/34] lsm: add/tweak function header comment blocks in lsm_init.c Paul Moore
2025-07-24 23:31 ` Casey Schaufler
2025-07-21 23:21 ` [RFC PATCH v2 20/34] lsm: cleanup the debug and console output " Paul Moore
2025-07-24 23:32 ` Casey Schaufler
2025-07-21 23:21 ` [RFC PATCH v2 21/34] lsm: output available LSMs when debugging Paul Moore
2025-07-24 23:33 ` Casey Schaufler
2025-07-21 23:21 ` [RFC PATCH v2 22/34] lsm: group lsm_order_parse() with the other lsm_order_*() functions Paul Moore
2025-07-24 23:34 ` Casey Schaufler
2025-07-21 23:21 ` [RFC PATCH v2 23/34] lsm: introduce an initcall mechanism into the LSM framework Paul Moore
2025-07-24 23:35 ` Casey Schaufler
2025-07-21 23:21 ` [RFC PATCH v2 24/34] loadpin: move initcalls to " Paul Moore
2025-07-21 23:21 ` [RFC PATCH v2 25/34] ipe: " Paul Moore
2025-07-21 23:21 ` [RFC PATCH v2 26/34] smack: " Paul Moore
2025-07-24 23:36 ` Casey Schaufler
2025-07-28 9:46 ` Roberto Sassu
2025-07-28 22:34 ` Paul Moore
2025-07-28 23:56 ` Casey Schaufler
2025-07-21 23:21 ` [RFC PATCH v2 27/34] tomoyo: " Paul Moore
2025-07-21 23:21 ` [RFC PATCH v2 28/34] safesetid: " Paul Moore
2025-07-21 23:21 ` [RFC PATCH v2 29/34] apparmor: " Paul Moore
2025-07-21 23:21 ` [RFC PATCH v2 30/34] lockdown: " Paul Moore
2025-07-25 8:12 ` Xiu Jianfeng
2025-07-25 16:51 ` Paul Moore
2025-07-26 9:38 ` xiujianfeng
2025-07-28 21:49 ` Paul Moore
2025-07-21 23:21 ` [RFC PATCH v2 31/34] ima,evm: " Paul Moore
2025-07-21 23:30 ` Paul Moore
2025-07-21 23:34 ` Paul Moore
2025-07-28 9:46 ` Nicolas Bouchinet
2025-07-28 10:43 ` Roberto Sassu
2025-07-28 23:17 ` Paul Moore
2025-07-21 23:21 ` [RFC PATCH v2 32/34] selinux: " Paul Moore
2025-07-21 23:21 ` [RFC PATCH v2 33/34] lsm: consolidate all of the LSM framework initcalls Paul Moore
2025-07-24 23:37 ` Casey Schaufler
2025-07-21 23:21 ` [RFC PATCH v2 34/34] lsm: add a LSM_STARTED_ALL notification event Paul Moore
2025-07-24 23:38 ` Casey Schaufler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250721232142.77224-48-paul@paul-moore.com \
--to=paul@paul-moore.com \
--cc=casey@schaufler-ca.com \
--cc=gnoack@google.com \
--cc=john.johansen@canonical.com \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mic@digikod.net \
--cc=mortonm@chromium.org \
--cc=nicolas.bouchinet@oss.cyber.gouv.fr \
--cc=penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp \
--cc=roberto.sassu@huawei.com \
--cc=selinux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wufan@kernel.org \
--cc=xiujianfeng@huawei.com \
--cc=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).