Re: [PATCH v4 00/54] tree-in-dcache stuff

Al Viro
2026-01-30T07:02:37Z

On Thu, Jan 29, 2026 at 05:16:20PM -0800, Samuel Wu wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 29, 2026 at 2:52 PM Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> wrote:
>
> > > Sorry, I hadn't been clear enough: if you do
> > > git switch --detach 1544775687f0
> > > and build the resulting tree, does the breakage reproduce? What I want
> > > to do is to split e5bf5ee26663 into smaller steps and see which one
> > > introduces the breakage, but the starting point would be verify that
> > > there's no breakage prior to that.
>
> Ultimately, same conclusion as before: 6.18-rc5 with patches up to
> 1544775687f0 works, but adding e5bf5ee26663 breaks it.

OK. Could you take a clone of mainline repository and in there run
; git fetch git://git.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/viro/vfs.git for-wsamuel:for-wsamuel
then
; git diff for-wsamuel e5bf5ee26663
to verify that for-wsamuel is identical to tree you've seen breakage on
; git diff for-wsamuel-base 1544775687f0
to verify that for-wsamuel-base is the tree where the breakage did not reproduce
Then bisect from for-wsamuel-base to for-wsamuel.

Basically, that's the offending commit split into steps; let's try to figure
out what causes the breakage with better resolution...