Re: [PATCH v4 00/54] tree-in-dcache stuff

Samuel Wu
2026-01-29T00:59:10Z

On Tue, Jan 27, 2026 at 8:58 PM Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> wrote:

> Very interesting... Does 1544775687f0 (parent of e5bf5ee26663)
> demonstrate that behaviour?

Reverting only 1544775687f0 (functionfs: need to cancel ->reset_work
in ->kill_sb()) does not fix the issue. With 6.19-rc7 as baseline, the
simplest working recipe at the moment is with 6ca67378d0e7,
c7747fafaba0, and e5bf5ee26663 reverted.