From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
Cc: selinux@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/8] apparmor: Remove redundant MS_MGC_MSK stripping in apparmor_sb_mount
Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2026 00:04:21 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260707000421.81C891F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260706235053.4104951-3-song@kernel.org>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] AppArmor's mount mediation contains a Time-of-Check to Time-of-Use (TOCTOU) vulnerability during mount operations (such as MS_BIND and MS_MOVE). It resolves user-supplied mount source paths via `kern_path()` for authorization. However, after authorization succeeds, VFS independently resolves the exact same string. An attacker can race this window to swap a symlink and mount unauthorized paths, entirely bypassing the MAC policy.
--
--- Patch [2]: [PATCH v6 2/8] apparmor: Remove redundant MS_MGC_MSK stripping in apparmor_sb_mount ---
commit eaca63dc76aaf43bda7315bdb224bbd33d80cf0e
Author: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
apparmor: Remove redundant MS_MGC_MSK stripping in apparmor_sb_mount
This commit removes a redundant MS_MGC_MSK flag stripping check from
apparmor_sb_mount(), as path_mount() already handles it.
> diff --git a/security/apparmor/lsm.c b/security/apparmor/lsm.c
> index 3491e9f601943..4415bca5889cf 100644
> --- a/security/apparmor/lsm.c
> +++ b/security/apparmor/lsm.c
> @@ -705,10 +705,6 @@ static int apparmor_sb_mount(const char *dev_name, const struct path *path,
> int error = 0;
> bool needput;
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does relying on the user-supplied dev_name
string here create a time-of-check to time-of-use vulnerability?
AppArmor's mount mediation resolves the untrusted user string dev_name via
kern_path() for authorization. For example:
security/apparmor/mount.c:aa_bind_mount() {
...
error = kern_path(dev_name, LOOKUP_FOLLOW|LOOKUP_AUTOMOUNT, &old_path);
...
}
After authorization succeeds, the core mount code independently resolves the
exact same string again:
fs/namespace.c:do_loopback() {
...
err = kern_path(old_name, LOOKUP_FOLLOW|LOOKUP_AUTOMOUNT, &old_path);
...
}
Could an attacker race this window to swap a symlink and mount unauthorized
paths, bypassing the access policy?
> - /* Discard magic */
> - if ((flags & MS_MGC_MSK) == MS_MGC_VAL)
> - flags &= ~MS_MGC_MSK;
> -
> flags &= ~AA_MS_IGNORE_MASK;
>
> label = __begin_current_label_crit_section(&needput);
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260706235053.4104951-1-song@kernel.org?part=2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-07 0:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-06 23:50 [PATCH v6 0/8] lsm: Replace security_sb_mount with granular mount hooks Song Liu
2026-07-06 23:50 ` [PATCH v6 1/8] lsm: Add " Song Liu
2026-07-07 0:00 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06 23:50 ` [PATCH v6 2/8] apparmor: Remove redundant MS_MGC_MSK stripping in apparmor_sb_mount Song Liu
2026-07-07 0:04 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-06 23:50 ` [PATCH v6 3/8] apparmor: Convert from sb_mount to granular mount hooks Song Liu
2026-07-07 0:05 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06 23:50 ` [PATCH v6 4/8] selinux: " Song Liu
2026-07-07 0:01 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06 23:50 ` [PATCH v6 5/8] landlock: " Song Liu
2026-07-07 0:04 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06 23:50 ` [PATCH v6 6/8] tomoyo: " Song Liu
2026-07-07 0:04 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06 23:50 ` [PATCH v6 7/8] vfs: Replace security_sb_mount/security_move_mount with granular hooks Song Liu
2026-07-07 0:06 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06 23:50 ` [PATCH v6 8/8] lsm: Remove security_sb_mount and security_move_mount Song Liu
2026-07-07 2:08 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-23 18:19 ` [PATCH v6 0/8] lsm: Replace security_sb_mount with granular mount hooks Song Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260707000421.81C891F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=selinux@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox