From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
Cc: selinux@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] proc: query LSMs for introspective mem access (if PROC_MEM_FORCE_ALWAYS)
Date: Mon, 07 Sep 2026 21:09:18 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260907210918.77FB61F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260907-selinux-pokemem-v3-2-0bafbaeafe50@google.com>
> If the system is running with PROC_MEM_FORCE_ALWAYS, LSMs currently have no
> good opportunity to block a process from overwriting read-only code in its
> own address space through FOLL_FORCE writes via /proc/self/mem.
> The security_ptrace_access_check() LSM hook is bypassed when a process
> opens /proc/self/mem because this is considered "introspection".
>
> This causes a hole in SELinux EXECMEM enforcement, which tries to ensure
> that a process cannot create executable anonymous pages.
>
> PROC_MEM_FORCE_PTRACE prevents that and ensures that such FOLL_FORCE
> accesses are only possible when the LSM allows ptrace() attachment; but it
> is unclear how quickly PROC_MEM_FORCE_PTRACE can be deployed in
> environments running lots of third-party code, such as Android.
>
> So, introduce a new LSM hook that can forbid FOLL_FORCE specifically for
> such "introspective" accesses.
>
> Acked-by: Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM) <ljs@kernel.org>
> Acked-by: David Hildenbrand (Arm) <david@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great!
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260907-selinux-pokemem-v3-0-0bafbaeafe50@google.com?part=2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-07 21:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-07 21:00 [PATCH v3 0/3] proc,security,selinux: let SELinux block FOLL_FORCE for /proc/self/mem Jann Horn
2026-09-07 21:00 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] proc: refactor /proc/$pid/mem to use struct as private_data Jann Horn
2026-09-07 21:07 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-07 21:00 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] proc: query LSMs for introspective mem access (if PROC_MEM_FORCE_ALWAYS) Jann Horn
2026-09-07 21:09 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-07 21:00 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] selinux: require PROCESS__PTRACE for FOLL_FORCE introspection Jann Horn
2026-09-07 21:08 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-10 7:48 ` [PATCH v3 0/3] proc,security,selinux: let SELinux block FOLL_FORCE for /proc/self/mem Christian Brauner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260907210918.77FB61F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=selinux@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox