From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D44F32C028F for ; Thu, 15 Jan 2026 17:02:03 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.133.124 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1768496525; cv=none; b=eX8QtRWaT2D3l8Iush9a8cal5duXNwJIJWCZNYl1oLbntsjwJFzhJfzj8YLu5HiYd1lQHJvuw8z3s5ODgFTl6ljAHTj6tYH6UKEKXl3uaLFk+2lMzuj8kazy4dBQU8nV8VjK7vlumAK5VpRW1Mj+vPfjwJrdpYGtundfs2UaovY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1768496525; c=relaxed/simple; bh=WR8pcxlcqN2uspbT4UutBk0CmJ7DfFWtIMh5e1/jKeo=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=oZLvZX2E4xE7nuzJHc9U0ouDxmcR20gRi3o1N1FPWFDpmU85KyC2n+rhXc4CRP0XVGPyvmwmayS2tY3+3iXBWptV0yVh49D2duS07HKnnmNAGl1P5czpGFkWncGzjxWbtAiZuRrIAoNyV2gnI7HSwOKXJXDXrhjM25svw8ZBexg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=WdBwTnIh; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.133.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="WdBwTnIh" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1768496522; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=10lMOvc/m0GUoSTUVm8irnB0p4aTqZIRPwTlIr0Zp4Q=; b=WdBwTnIhwZlV0Jtfh30tCkXqM5mtW4Oa+TmZHM0IS93zHZpQp8I8/H0/fqx7icbRgecT79 oRmNXXv1h/K/X+BHN2Opknb4JH5Sxw2OkjnD55zjoF0gWRPu8tB+tKmgJWObjOoQO4ja2x kkZ2GZxiPMX+71lHBhye+p1Imz7TLME= Received: from mx-prod-mc-03.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (ec2-54-186-198-63.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [54.186.198.63]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-2-H8R1Gbu8MPaORGgbqu4jFA-1; Thu, 15 Jan 2026 12:02:01 -0500 X-MC-Unique: H8R1Gbu8MPaORGgbqu4jFA-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: H8R1Gbu8MPaORGgbqu4jFA_1768496520 Received: from mx-prod-int-01.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (mx-prod-int-01.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com [10.30.177.4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mx-prod-mc-03.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 467A41956070; Thu, 15 Jan 2026 17:02:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (unknown [10.45.224.54]) by mx-prod-int-01.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5C303001DB9; Thu, 15 Jan 2026 17:01:59 +0000 (UTC) From: Petr Lautrbach To: Paul Moore Cc: selinux@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] SECURITY.md: add lautrbach@redhat.com gpg fingerprint In-Reply-To: References: <20260105174020.887724-1-lautrbach@redhat.com> <87h5sxvd52.fsf@redhat.com> <87cy3kv5w2.fsf@redhat.com> <873448ujz1.fsf@redhat.com> <87pl7b1f0n.fsf@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2026 18:01:58 +0100 Message-ID: <87jyxi24jd.fsf@redhat.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: selinux@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.4.1 on 10.30.177.4 Paul Moore writes: > On Thu, Jan 15, 2026 at 3:01=E2=80=AFAM Petr Lautrbach wrote: >> >> "68D2 1823 342A 1368 3AEB 3E4E FB4C 685B 5DC1 C13E" is not a subkey. > > Okay, in this case you need to get this new key signed by other > individuals trusted by the SELinux community before we can consider > including it in the SECURITY.md file. > My idea was: Before this patch my address was there without gpg fingerprint. It means that I could be contacted directly via un-encrypted email. The key I used in this patch was already used for SELinux userspace release, public key is available at 2 different locations connected to me - github (I'm part of SELinux organization) and plautrba.fedorapeople.org (I'm a packager for 15+ years) and it's also used in Fedora [1] and RHEL [2] - only Red Hat employees can push there and= it was me who pushed [3]. That being said I expected that the key is already trusted due to all the records. But I see your point. I'll send another patch which will remove my address = from SECURITY.md and when the key is signed, I'll return it back. [1] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/policycoreutils/blob/rawhide/f/bachr= adsusi.gpg [2] https://gitlab.com/redhat/centos-stream/rpms/policycoreutils/-/blob/c10= s/bachradsusi.gpg?ref_type=3Dheads [3] https://gitlab.com/redhat/centos-stream/rpms/policycoreutils/-/commit/0= 2af42ef7ea24c279708ea83cc2698b738bdee8c Petr