From: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
To: "Christian Göttsche" <cgzones@googlemail.com>
Cc: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>,
Stephen Smalley <stephen.smalley.work@gmail.com>,
security@kernel.org, selinux@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Suspected off-by-one in context_struct_to_string()
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2026 09:26:03 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aWn2G3soUcbnJ07r@1wt.eu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJ2a_DeFC5Z2VKXoDDkKmhcB8cft_ZtU1UtriPX292q4GRyh-A@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Jan 16, 2026 at 09:16:10AM +0100, Christian Göttsche wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Jan 2026 at 21:20, Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu> wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > we've received a suspected vulnerability report on the kernel security
> > list, that was clearly generated by AI and really not clear at all on
> > the root causes nor impacts. We first dismissed it and it kept coming
> > back a few times. I'm not pasting it because it's more confusing than
> > interesting, though I can pass it to the maintainers if desired. I'm
> > also purposely *not* CCing the reporter, as the address changed a few
> > times, and once you respond you receive a new copy of the same report.
> > Clearly this bot deserves a bit more tuning.
> >
> > The report claimed that the call to mls_compute_context_len() didn't
> > properly reflect the size needed by mls_sid_to_context() due to an
> > off-by-one that would result in the trailing zero being written too far.
> > Initially we thought that was wrong since there are +1 everywhere in
> > all lengths calculation in the function. But revisiting it today made
> > us realize that this indeed seems to be true: the +1 that are everywhere
> > are in fact due to the surrounding delimiters, and the first one that
> > appeared to be the one accounting for the trailing zero was in fact
> > for the starting colon.
> >
> > In context_struct_to_string(), we have this:
> >
> > *scontext_len += strlen(sym_name(p, SYM_USERS, context->user - 1)) + 1;
> > *scontext_len += strlen(sym_name(p, SYM_ROLES, context->role - 1)) + 1;
> > *scontext_len += strlen(sym_name(p, SYM_TYPES, context->type - 1)) + 1;
>
> I think this +1 from the type name length covers the trailing NUL
> byte, since mls_compute_context_len() and mls_sid_to_context() cover
> the one byte space for the separating colon between type and optional
> MLS component.
Sorry if I'm not clear, but my point is that above each strlen()+1
seems to serve as the length of the text + its colon delimiter, so
it covers useful chars and excludes the trailing zero, which is fine.
> > *scontext_len += mls_compute_context_len(p, context);
Here it does exactly the same.
> >
> > *scontext_len is initialized to zero, is increased by the length of each
> > appended string + delimiter, and used as-is in kmalloc() a few lines later:
So now we're allocating an area of the number of useful chars, not
counting the trailing zero.
> > scontextp = kmalloc(*scontext_len, GFP_ATOMIC);
> >
> > then filled by sprintf() then mls_sid_to_context():
> >
> > scontextp += sprintf(scontextp, "%s:%s:%s",
> > sym_name(p, SYM_USERS, context->user - 1),
> > sym_name(p, SYM_ROLES, context->role - 1),
> > sym_name(p, SYM_TYPES, context->type - 1));
> >
> > mls_sid_to_context(p, context, &scontextp);
> >
> > And finally the trailing zero is appended:
> >
> > *scontextp = 0;
Yet we're emitting it.
At least that's how I read it.
Willy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-16 8:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-15 20:18 Suspected off-by-one in context_struct_to_string() Willy Tarreau
2026-01-15 22:34 ` Paul Moore
2026-01-16 8:16 ` Christian Göttsche
2026-01-16 8:26 ` Willy Tarreau [this message]
2026-01-16 15:12 ` Stephen Smalley
2026-01-16 15:30 ` Willy Tarreau
2026-01-16 16:58 ` Stephen Smalley
2026-01-16 17:34 ` Willy Tarreau
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aWn2G3soUcbnJ07r@1wt.eu \
--to=w@1wt.eu \
--cc=cgzones@googlemail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
--cc=security@kernel.org \
--cc=selinux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stephen.smalley.work@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox