selinux.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
To: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>,
	linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, selinux@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "John Johansen" <john.johansen@canonical.com>,
	"Mimi Zohar" <zohar@linux.ibm.com>,
	"Roberto Sassu" <roberto.sassu@huawei.com>,
	"Fan Wu" <wufan@kernel.org>, "Mickaël Salaün" <mic@digikod.net>,
	"Günther Noack" <gnoack@google.com>,
	"Kees Cook" <kees@kernel.org>,
	"Micah Morton" <mortonm@chromium.org>,
	"Tetsuo Handa" <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
	"Nicolas Bouchinet" <nicolas.bouchinet@oss.cyber.gouv.fr>,
	"Xiu Jianfeng" <xiujianfeng@huawei.com>,
	"Casey Schaufler" <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 16/34] lsm: cleanup the LSM blob size code
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2025 16:28:36 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <cd7a91fa-a731-48e2-a0e7-d098559603a1@schaufler-ca.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250721232142.77224-52-paul@paul-moore.com>

On 7/21/2025 4:21 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
> Convert the lsm_blob_size fields to unsigned integers as there is no
> current need for them to be negative, change "lsm_set_blob_size()" to
> "lsm_blob_size_update()" to better reflect reality, and perform some
> other minor cleanups to the associated code.
>
> Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>
> Reviewed-by: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>
> Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>

Reviewed-by: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>


> ---
>  include/linux/lsm_hooks.h | 28 ++++++++++-----------
>  security/lsm_init.c       | 51 +++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
>  2 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/lsm_hooks.h b/include/linux/lsm_hooks.h
> index bc477fb20d02..a7ecb0791a0f 100644
> --- a/include/linux/lsm_hooks.h
> +++ b/include/linux/lsm_hooks.h
> @@ -102,20 +102,20 @@ struct security_hook_list {
>   * Security blob size or offset data.
>   */
>  struct lsm_blob_sizes {
> -	int lbs_cred;
> -	int lbs_file;
> -	int lbs_ib;
> -	int lbs_inode;
> -	int lbs_sock;
> -	int lbs_superblock;
> -	int lbs_ipc;
> -	int lbs_key;
> -	int lbs_msg_msg;
> -	int lbs_perf_event;
> -	int lbs_task;
> -	int lbs_xattr_count; /* number of xattr slots in new_xattrs array */
> -	int lbs_tun_dev;
> -	int lbs_bdev;
> +	unsigned int lbs_cred;
> +	unsigned int lbs_file;
> +	unsigned int lbs_ib;
> +	unsigned int lbs_inode;
> +	unsigned int lbs_sock;
> +	unsigned int lbs_superblock;
> +	unsigned int lbs_ipc;
> +	unsigned int lbs_key;
> +	unsigned int lbs_msg_msg;
> +	unsigned int lbs_perf_event;
> +	unsigned int lbs_task;
> +	unsigned int lbs_xattr_count; /* num xattr slots in new_xattrs array */
> +	unsigned int lbs_tun_dev;
> +	unsigned int lbs_bdev;
>  };
>  
>  /*
> diff --git a/security/lsm_init.c b/security/lsm_init.c
> index b1156f414491..aad363e37140 100644
> --- a/security/lsm_init.c
> +++ b/security/lsm_init.c
> @@ -169,16 +169,22 @@ static void __init lsm_order_append(struct lsm_info *lsm, const char *src)
>  		   lsm_is_enabled(lsm) ? "enabled" : "disabled");
>  }
>  
> -static void __init lsm_set_blob_size(int *need, int *lbs)
> +/**
> + * lsm_blob_size_update - Update the LSM blob size and offset information
> + * @sz_req: the requested additional blob size
> + * @sz_cur: the existing blob size
> + */
> +static void __init lsm_blob_size_update(unsigned int *sz_req,
> +					unsigned int *sz_cur)
>  {
> -	int offset;
> +	unsigned int offset;
>  
> -	if (*need <= 0)
> +	if (*sz_req == 0)
>  		return;
>  
> -	offset = ALIGN(*lbs, sizeof(void *));
> -	*lbs = offset + *need;
> -	*need = offset;
> +	offset = ALIGN(*sz_cur, sizeof(void *));
> +	*sz_cur = offset + *sz_req;
> +	*sz_req = offset;
>  }
>  
>  /**
> @@ -193,24 +199,27 @@ static void __init lsm_prepare(struct lsm_info *lsm)
>  		return;
>  
>  	/* Register the LSM blob sizes. */
> -	lsm_set_blob_size(&blobs->lbs_cred, &blob_sizes.lbs_cred);
> -	lsm_set_blob_size(&blobs->lbs_file, &blob_sizes.lbs_file);
> -	lsm_set_blob_size(&blobs->lbs_ib, &blob_sizes.lbs_ib);
> +	blobs = lsm->blobs;
> +	lsm_blob_size_update(&blobs->lbs_cred, &blob_sizes.lbs_cred);
> +	lsm_blob_size_update(&blobs->lbs_file, &blob_sizes.lbs_file);
> +	lsm_blob_size_update(&blobs->lbs_ib, &blob_sizes.lbs_ib);
>  	/* inode blob gets an rcu_head in addition to LSM blobs. */
>  	if (blobs->lbs_inode && blob_sizes.lbs_inode == 0)
>  		blob_sizes.lbs_inode = sizeof(struct rcu_head);
> -	lsm_set_blob_size(&blobs->lbs_inode, &blob_sizes.lbs_inode);
> -	lsm_set_blob_size(&blobs->lbs_ipc, &blob_sizes.lbs_ipc);
> -	lsm_set_blob_size(&blobs->lbs_key, &blob_sizes.lbs_key);
> -	lsm_set_blob_size(&blobs->lbs_msg_msg, &blob_sizes.lbs_msg_msg);
> -	lsm_set_blob_size(&blobs->lbs_perf_event, &blob_sizes.lbs_perf_event);
> -	lsm_set_blob_size(&blobs->lbs_sock, &blob_sizes.lbs_sock);
> -	lsm_set_blob_size(&blobs->lbs_superblock, &blob_sizes.lbs_superblock);
> -	lsm_set_blob_size(&blobs->lbs_task, &blob_sizes.lbs_task);
> -	lsm_set_blob_size(&blobs->lbs_tun_dev, &blob_sizes.lbs_tun_dev);
> -	lsm_set_blob_size(&blobs->lbs_xattr_count,
> -			  &blob_sizes.lbs_xattr_count);
> -	lsm_set_blob_size(&blobs->lbs_bdev, &blob_sizes.lbs_bdev);
> +	lsm_blob_size_update(&blobs->lbs_inode, &blob_sizes.lbs_inode);
> +	lsm_blob_size_update(&blobs->lbs_ipc, &blob_sizes.lbs_ipc);
> +	lsm_blob_size_update(&blobs->lbs_key, &blob_sizes.lbs_key);
> +	lsm_blob_size_update(&blobs->lbs_msg_msg, &blob_sizes.lbs_msg_msg);
> +	lsm_blob_size_update(&blobs->lbs_perf_event,
> +			     &blob_sizes.lbs_perf_event);
> +	lsm_blob_size_update(&blobs->lbs_sock, &blob_sizes.lbs_sock);
> +	lsm_blob_size_update(&blobs->lbs_superblock,
> +			     &blob_sizes.lbs_superblock);
> +	lsm_blob_size_update(&blobs->lbs_task, &blob_sizes.lbs_task);
> +	lsm_blob_size_update(&blobs->lbs_tun_dev, &blob_sizes.lbs_tun_dev);
> +	lsm_blob_size_update(&blobs->lbs_xattr_count,
> +			     &blob_sizes.lbs_xattr_count);
> +	lsm_blob_size_update(&blobs->lbs_bdev, &blob_sizes.lbs_bdev);
>  }
>  
>  /* Initialize a given LSM, if it is enabled. */

  reply	other threads:[~2025-07-24 23:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 77+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-07-21 23:21 [RFC PATCH v2 0/34] Rework the LSM initialization Paul Moore
2025-07-21 23:21 ` [RFC PATCH v2 01/34] lsm: split the notifier code out into lsm_notifier.c Paul Moore
2025-07-24 14:49   ` Casey Schaufler
2025-07-21 23:21 ` [RFC PATCH v2 02/34] lsm: split the init code out into lsm_init.c Paul Moore
2025-07-24 14:50   ` Casey Schaufler
2025-07-21 23:21 ` [RFC PATCH v2 03/34] lsm: consolidate lsm_allowed() and prepare_lsm() into lsm_prepare() Paul Moore
2025-07-24 14:52   ` Casey Schaufler
2025-07-21 23:21 ` [RFC PATCH v2 04/34] lsm: introduce looping macros for the initialization code Paul Moore
2025-07-24 15:10   ` Casey Schaufler
2025-07-21 23:21 ` [RFC PATCH v2 05/34] lsm: integrate report_lsm_order() code into caller Paul Moore
2025-07-24 15:19   ` Casey Schaufler
2025-07-21 23:21 ` [RFC PATCH v2 06/34] lsm: integrate lsm_early_cred() and lsm_early_task() " Paul Moore
2025-07-24 15:20   ` Casey Schaufler
2025-07-21 23:21 ` [RFC PATCH v2 07/34] lsm: rename ordered_lsm_init() to lsm_init_ordered() Paul Moore
2025-07-24 15:28   ` Casey Schaufler
2025-07-21 23:21 ` [RFC PATCH v2 08/34] lsm: replace the name field with a pointer to the lsm_id struct Paul Moore
2025-07-24 15:30   ` Casey Schaufler
2025-07-21 23:21 ` [RFC PATCH v2 09/34] lsm: rename the lsm order variables for consistency Paul Moore
2025-07-24 15:31   ` Casey Schaufler
2025-07-21 23:21 ` [RFC PATCH v2 10/34] lsm: rework lsm_active_cnt and lsm_idlist[] Paul Moore
2025-07-24 15:34   ` Casey Schaufler
2025-07-25  0:26     ` Paul Moore
2025-07-21 23:21 ` [RFC PATCH v2 11/34] lsm: get rid of the lsm_names list and do some cleanup Paul Moore
2025-07-24 15:39   ` Casey Schaufler
2025-07-25  2:28     ` Paul Moore
2025-07-25 14:26       ` Casey Schaufler
2025-07-25 16:42         ` Paul Moore
2025-07-21 23:21 ` [RFC PATCH v2 12/34] lsm: rework the LSM enable/disable setter/getter functions Paul Moore
2025-07-24 15:44   ` Casey Schaufler
2025-07-21 23:21 ` [RFC PATCH v2 13/34] lsm: rename exists_ordered_lsm() to lsm_order_exists() Paul Moore
2025-07-24 15:45   ` Casey Schaufler
2025-07-21 23:21 ` [RFC PATCH v2 14/34] lsm: rename/rework append_ordered_lsm() into lsm_order_append() Paul Moore
2025-07-24 15:47   ` Casey Schaufler
2025-07-21 23:21 ` [RFC PATCH v2 15/34] lsm: rename/rework ordered_lsm_parse() to lsm_order_parse() Paul Moore
2025-07-24 15:48   ` Casey Schaufler
2025-07-21 23:21 ` [RFC PATCH v2 16/34] lsm: cleanup the LSM blob size code Paul Moore
2025-07-24 23:28   ` Casey Schaufler [this message]
2025-07-21 23:21 ` [RFC PATCH v2 17/34] lsm: cleanup initialize_lsm() and rename to lsm_init_single() Paul Moore
2025-07-24 23:29   ` Casey Schaufler
2025-07-21 23:21 ` [RFC PATCH v2 18/34] lsm: fold lsm_init_ordered() into security_init() Paul Moore
2025-07-24 23:30   ` Casey Schaufler
2025-07-21 23:21 ` [RFC PATCH v2 19/34] lsm: add/tweak function header comment blocks in lsm_init.c Paul Moore
2025-07-24 23:31   ` Casey Schaufler
2025-07-21 23:21 ` [RFC PATCH v2 20/34] lsm: cleanup the debug and console output " Paul Moore
2025-07-24 23:32   ` Casey Schaufler
2025-07-21 23:21 ` [RFC PATCH v2 21/34] lsm: output available LSMs when debugging Paul Moore
2025-07-24 23:33   ` Casey Schaufler
2025-07-21 23:21 ` [RFC PATCH v2 22/34] lsm: group lsm_order_parse() with the other lsm_order_*() functions Paul Moore
2025-07-24 23:34   ` Casey Schaufler
2025-07-21 23:21 ` [RFC PATCH v2 23/34] lsm: introduce an initcall mechanism into the LSM framework Paul Moore
2025-07-24 23:35   ` Casey Schaufler
2025-07-21 23:21 ` [RFC PATCH v2 24/34] loadpin: move initcalls to " Paul Moore
2025-07-21 23:21 ` [RFC PATCH v2 25/34] ipe: " Paul Moore
2025-07-21 23:21 ` [RFC PATCH v2 26/34] smack: " Paul Moore
2025-07-24 23:36   ` Casey Schaufler
2025-07-28  9:46   ` Roberto Sassu
2025-07-28 22:34     ` Paul Moore
2025-07-28 23:56       ` Casey Schaufler
2025-07-21 23:21 ` [RFC PATCH v2 27/34] tomoyo: " Paul Moore
2025-07-21 23:21 ` [RFC PATCH v2 28/34] safesetid: " Paul Moore
2025-07-21 23:21 ` [RFC PATCH v2 29/34] apparmor: " Paul Moore
2025-07-21 23:21 ` [RFC PATCH v2 30/34] lockdown: " Paul Moore
2025-07-25  8:12   ` Xiu Jianfeng
2025-07-25 16:51     ` Paul Moore
2025-07-26  9:38       ` xiujianfeng
2025-07-28 21:49         ` Paul Moore
2025-07-21 23:21 ` [RFC PATCH v2 31/34] ima,evm: " Paul Moore
2025-07-21 23:30   ` Paul Moore
2025-07-21 23:34     ` Paul Moore
2025-07-28  9:46   ` Nicolas Bouchinet
2025-07-28 10:43     ` Roberto Sassu
2025-07-28 23:17       ` Paul Moore
2025-07-21 23:21 ` [RFC PATCH v2 32/34] selinux: " Paul Moore
2025-07-21 23:21 ` [RFC PATCH v2 33/34] lsm: consolidate all of the LSM framework initcalls Paul Moore
2025-07-24 23:37   ` Casey Schaufler
2025-07-21 23:21 ` [RFC PATCH v2 34/34] lsm: add a LSM_STARTED_ALL notification event Paul Moore
2025-07-24 23:38   ` Casey Schaufler

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=cd7a91fa-a731-48e2-a0e7-d098559603a1@schaufler-ca.com \
    --to=casey@schaufler-ca.com \
    --cc=gnoack@google.com \
    --cc=john.johansen@canonical.com \
    --cc=kees@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mic@digikod.net \
    --cc=mortonm@chromium.org \
    --cc=nicolas.bouchinet@oss.cyber.gouv.fr \
    --cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
    --cc=penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp \
    --cc=roberto.sassu@huawei.com \
    --cc=selinux@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=wufan@kernel.org \
    --cc=xiujianfeng@huawei.com \
    --cc=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).