From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9D907C0015E for ; Mon, 7 Aug 2023 01:14:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) id 60B42C433C9; Mon, 7 Aug 2023 01:14:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from szxga02-in.huawei.com (szxga02-in.huawei.com [45.249.212.188]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD657C433C7; Mon, 7 Aug 2023 01:14:13 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 smtp.kernel.org BD657C433C7 Authentication-Results: smtp.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: smtp.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com Received: from kwepemm600004.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.56]) by szxga02-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4RJytL0f9kzGpwh; Mon, 7 Aug 2023 09:10:34 +0800 (CST) Received: from [10.67.103.231] (10.67.103.231) by kwepemm600004.china.huawei.com (7.193.23.242) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2507.27; Mon, 7 Aug 2023 09:14:01 +0800 Message-ID: <158db0ea-48f5-ccd8-9a8d-6bbbbbd8243f@huawei.com> Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2023 09:14:00 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.2.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] soc: hisilicon: Support HCCS driver on Kunpeng SoC To: Zenghui Yu , , , , , List-Id: CC: , , , , , References: <20230424073020.4039-1-lihuisong@huawei.com> <20230801024119.37215-1-lihuisong@huawei.com> <20230801024119.37215-2-lihuisong@huawei.com> From: "lihuisong (C)" In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Originating-IP: [10.67.103.231] X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems702-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.179) To kwepemm600004.china.huawei.com (7.193.23.242) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected 在 2023/8/6 23:09, Zenghui Yu 写道: > A few trivial comments inline. Hi Zenghui, Many thanks for reviewing my patch carefully.😁 > > On 2023/8/1 10:41, Huisong Li wrote: >> The Huawei Cache Coherence System (HCCS) is a multi-chip interconnection >> bus protocol. The performance of the application may be affected if some >> HCCS ports on platform are not in full lane status, have a large number >> of CRC errors and so on. >> >> This driver provides the query interface of the health status and >> port information of HCCS on Kunpeng SoC. >> >> Signed-off-by: Huisong Li > > [...] > >> +static int hccs_query_all_port_info_on_platform(struct hccs_dev *hdev) >> +{ >> + >> +    struct device *dev = hdev->dev; >> +    struct hccs_chip_info *chip; >> +    struct hccs_die_info *die; >> +    u8 i, j; >> +    int ret; >> + >> +    for (i = 0; i < hdev->chip_num; i++) { >> +        chip = &hdev->chips[i]; >> +        for (j = 0; j < chip->die_num; j++) { >> +            die = &chip->dies[j]; >> +            if (!die->port_num) >> +                continue; >> + >> +            die->ports = devm_kzalloc(dev, >> +                die->port_num * sizeof(struct hccs_port_info), >> +                GFP_KERNEL); >> +            if (!die->ports) { >> +                dev_err(dev, "allocate ports memory on chip%u/die%u >> failed.\n", >> +                    i, die->die_id); >> +                return -ENOMEM; >> +            } >> + >> +            ret = hccs_get_all_port_info_on_die(hdev, die); >> +            if (ret) { >> +                dev_err(dev, "get die(%u) info on chip%u failed, ret >> = %d.\n", > > "get *port* info failed"? Yes, this is more exact. Will be fixed to "get port info on chip%u/die%u failed" > >> +static int hccs_get_die_all_link_status(struct hccs_dev *hdev, >> +                    const struct hccs_die_info *die, >> +                    u8 *all_linked) >> +{ >> +    struct hccs_die_comm_req_param *req_param; >> +    struct hccs_desc desc; >> +    int ret; >> + >> +    if (die->port_num == 0) { >> +        *all_linked = 1; >> +        return 0; >> +    } >> + >> +    hccs_init_req_desc(&desc); >> +    req_param = (struct hccs_die_comm_req_param *)desc.req.data; >> +    req_param->chip_id = die->chip->chip_id; >> +    req_param->die_id = die->die_id; >> +    ret = hccs_pcc_cmd_send(hdev, HCCS_GET_DIE_PORTS_LANE_STA, &desc); > > Typo? Looks like we intend to send a HCCS_GET_DIE_PORTS_LINK_STA > command. Yes, you are right. It's my fault. Appreciate you so much for pointing it out. I will also check other commands again. > >> +/* >> + * This value cannot be 255, otherwise the loop of the multi-BD >> communication >> + * case cannot end. >> + */ >> +#define HCCS_DIE_MAX_PORT_ID    254 > > This looks weird. Isn't the "max port id" depends on your HW > implementation? > >> +#define hccs_get_field(origin, mask, shift) \ >> +    (((origin) & (mask)) >> (shift)) >> +#define hccs_get_bit(origin, shift) \ >> +    hccs_get_field((origin), (0x1UL << (shift)), (shift)) > > Unused macroes. > > P.S., I'd personally prefer splitting this patch in 2 to ease other > reviewer's work: > > - deal with the HCCS HW (chip/die/port) probing > - focus on the sysfs/query things > > Zenghui > .