From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 78A80212D6B for ; Thu, 6 Mar 2025 16:31:49 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1741278709; cv=none; b=C+qVgT7aVqgKqPzNak5Qold4xcvXP8D+UeoH1PbI/j36ktqR9t0hO2v3dw385BmBk2M6CY1mVN6Sl2t9jgNH+JqcmaN6hJqXXKJEGPgmyARjNOuXzZQgbgGFaCZFV/uMZqZbxviMxvFQSU5BW/9ccddC8+Zu2NkGWQvQPzrqDZk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1741278709; c=relaxed/simple; bh=gSFp9l+GV/YReusNeaeG27owtRQDpZ/EeHoxvGKsCUI=; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Subject:From:Message-Id:Date:References: In-Reply-To:To:Cc; b=FjbZluZsFCa7QqfXHNGY7EFsz9XsWRFXdinPKlgkAM1mThLZQo+SHVBhkIRPWNFRRJ4MG9r15Z2KG/at3vD9FDOEDe8euzobAoqOPoqJ2g5Z5OqN7+ttlWA5gfAAYK60yKYlRZPFdZRVySTbGgBMrY1C31/0d52oDrCtTs45d20= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=uQ/jYNPc; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="uQ/jYNPc" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) id 05523C4CEE4; Thu, 6 Mar 2025 16:31:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E3E40C4CEE0; Thu, 6 Mar 2025 16:31:48 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1741278708; bh=gSFp9l+GV/YReusNeaeG27owtRQDpZ/EeHoxvGKsCUI=; h=Subject:From:Date:References:In-Reply-To:To:Cc:From; b=uQ/jYNPcCZWyJ29puHIdnfPDMVlrzSMex8Z1bd4/6tHk34/+KLThb+6jZBfQ8RbzS tZRiPvGFGIvHh1vnI/459Ba62fTByb1T1tV1CHRykGCJZPs4L/nqSV1N76oLFk5+Pf MhGkX3/dP5ne0qr7qp9qhqPKksPbby1ZlUxA3tPNxfOx2MUKOzzvdBs4WRFi1wMxgP ipzlTLpgMrVBtt2ccEaTMy0pReNXAYWYAhEKryNCh3yiP21i4l6dH6CcQeUg9ETud4 RoiVV11wqH3A2UDeflHuYjRayMhR2ZpOrgExGSvLXUuLD1vp4lq2un0fQJthXkot1U Tbn42x++EzLPg== Received: from [10.30.226.235] (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by aws-us-west-2-korg-oddjob-rhel9-1.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71063380CEE6; Thu, 6 Mar 2025 16:32:23 +0000 (UTC) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: soc@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [PATCH] firmware: arm_scmi: use ioread64() instead of ioread64_hi_lo() From: patchwork-bot+linux-soc@kernel.org Message-Id: <174127874224.1655995.5770719690686079153.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2025 16:32:22 +0000 References: <20250304144346.1025658-1-arnd@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20250304144346.1025658-1-arnd@kernel.org> To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: soc@kernel.org Hello: This patch was applied to soc/soc.git (for-next) by Arnd Bergmann : On Tue, 4 Mar 2025 15:43:34 +0100 you wrote: > From: Arnd Bergmann > > The scmi_common_fastchannel_db_ring() function calls either ioread64() > or ioread64_hi_lo() depending on whether it is compiler for 32-bit > or 64-bit architectures. > > The same logic is used to define ioread64() itself in the > linux/io-64-nonatomic-hi-lo.h header file, so the special case > is not really needed. > > [...] Here is the summary with links: - firmware: arm_scmi: use ioread64() instead of ioread64_hi_lo() https://git.kernel.org/soc/soc/c/3b8c56d80727 You are awesome, thank you! -- Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot. https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html