From: "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>
To: "Marek Behún" <kabel@kernel.org>,
"Gregory Clement" <gregory.clement@bootlin.com>,
"Andrew Lunn" <andrew@lunn.ch>,
soc@kernel.org, arm <arm@kernel.org>,
"Andy Shevchenko" <andy@kernel.org>,
"Hans de Goede" <hdegoede@redhat.com>,
"Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/19] Updates for turris-mox-rwtm driver
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2024 13:11:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4b4785ca-0fba-4227-8186-c5da08d38eb2@app.fastmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240715104723.17751-1-kabel@kernel.org>
On Mon, Jul 15, 2024, at 12:47, Marek Behún wrote:
> Hi Arnd, Andy, Gregory et al.
>
> this is v4 of series of fixes, refactors and cleanups for the
> turris-mox-rwtm driver.
>
> Changes since v3:
> - addressed Andy's recommendations. Some of them resulted in 2 new
> patches (08/19 and 18/19). Im patch 10/19 I did not address Andy's
> comment
> "Actually you may do that without devm. There is a lookup method
> or so in debugfs APIs that can be used. Can be amended later on,
> though."
> since I do not see how to use the debugfs_lookup_and_remove()
> function without devm and get rid of the driver's .remove() method
> at the same time...
>
Hi Marek,
The 6.11 merge window is now open, so I am not applying the
cleanup and refactoring patches for this release.
Can you separate the two and resend just the bugfixes so I can
apply them into a branch for 6.11-rc1? After -rc1 is out
with those fixes, please rebase the rest and send that got
inclusion in 6.12.
Arnd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-15 11:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-15 10:47 [PATCH v4 00/19] Updates for turris-mox-rwtm driver Marek Behún
2024-07-15 10:47 ` [PATCH v4 01/19] firmware: turris-mox-rwtm: Do not complete if there are no waiters Marek Behún
2024-07-15 10:47 ` [PATCH v4 02/19] firmware: turris-mox-rwtm: Fix checking return value of wait_for_completion_timeout() Marek Behún
2024-07-15 10:47 ` [PATCH v4 03/19] firmware: turris-mox-rwtm: Use macro constant instead of hardcoded 4096 Marek Behún
2024-07-15 10:47 ` [PATCH v4 04/19] firmware: turris-mox-rwtm: Use ETH_ALEN instead of hardcoded 6 Marek Behún
2024-07-15 10:47 ` [PATCH v4 05/19] firmware: turris-mox-rwtm: Use the boolean type where appropriate Marek Behún
2024-07-15 10:47 ` [PATCH v4 06/19] firmware: turris-mox-rwtm: Hide signature related constants behind macros Marek Behún
2024-07-15 10:47 ` [PATCH v4 07/19] firmware: turris-mox-rwtm: Fix driver includes Marek Behún
2024-07-15 10:47 ` [PATCH v4 08/19] firmware: turris-mox-rwtm: Use sysfs_emit() instead of sprintf() Marek Behún
2024-07-15 10:47 ` [PATCH v4 09/19] firmware: turris-mox-rwtm: Don't create own kobject type Marek Behún
2024-07-15 10:47 ` [PATCH v4 10/19] firmware: turris-mox-rwtm: Simplify debugfs code Marek Behún
2024-07-15 10:47 ` [PATCH v4 11/19] firmware: turris-mox-rwtm: Convert rest to devm_* and get rid of driver .remove() Marek Behún
2024-07-15 10:47 ` [PATCH v4 12/19] firmware: turris-mox-rwtm: Use dev_err_probe() where possible Marek Behún
2024-07-15 10:47 ` [PATCH v4 13/19] firmware: turris-mox-rwtm: Initialize completion before mailbox Marek Behún
2024-07-15 10:47 ` [PATCH v4 14/19] firmware: turris-mox-rwtm: Drop redundant device pointer Marek Behún
2024-07-15 10:47 ` [PATCH v4 15/19] firmware: turris-mox-rwtm: Use devm_mutex_init() instead of mutex_init() Marek Behún
2024-07-15 10:47 ` [PATCH v4 16/19] firmware: turris-mox-rwtm: Use container_of() instead of hwrng .priv member Marek Behún
2024-07-15 10:47 ` [PATCH v4 17/19] firmware: turris-mox-rwtm: Use EOPNOTSUPP instead of ENOSYS Marek Behún
2024-07-15 10:47 ` [PATCH v4 18/19] firmware: turris-mox-rwtm: Use ALIGN() instead of hardcoding Marek Behún
2024-07-15 10:47 ` [PATCH v4 19/19] firmware: turris-mox-rwtm: Deduplicate command execution code Marek Behún
2024-07-15 11:11 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2024-08-06 20:08 ` [PATCH v4 00/19] Updates for turris-mox-rwtm driver patchwork-bot+linux-soc
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4b4785ca-0fba-4227-8186-c5da08d38eb2@app.fastmail.com \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=andy@kernel.org \
--cc=arm@kernel.org \
--cc=gregory.clement@bootlin.com \
--cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kabel@kernel.org \
--cc=soc@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox